SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Does Autotelic Personality Make a Difference in The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Individual Performance?

Ototelik Kişilik, Öz-Yeterliliğin Bireysel Performans Üzerindeki Etkisinde Fark Yaratır Mı?

Murat GÜLER
Onur KÖKSAL
Fatih ÇETİN
Pages
271–283
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on employee performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of self-efficacy on individual performance and to find out whether autotelic personality differentiates this process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this scope, the research data were collected from 308 blue-collar employees working in a private company by survey method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on employee performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öz-yeterlilik · ototelik kişilik · bireysel performans

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of self-efficacy on individual performance and to find out whether autotelic personality differentiates this process. Within this scope, the research data were collected from 308 blue-collar employees working in a private company by survey method. In order to test the hypotheses of the study, direct and moderating effects were investigated by regression analysis. The results showed that self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on employee performance. Moreover, autotelic personality dampened this relationship, particularly low and high level autotelic personality had different effects on individual performance at lower levels of self-efficacy. The findings were discussed in the context of literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öz-yeterliliğin bireysel performans üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmesi ve bu sürecin ototelik kişilik açısından farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığının ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Bu kapsamda, özel bir işletmede görev yapan 308 mavi yakalı çalışandan anket tekniğiyle veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek için regresyon analizi kullanılarak doğrudan ve düzenleyici etkiler incelenmiştir. Analizler sonucunda öz-yeterliliğin çalışan performansı üzerinde aynı yönlü anlamlı etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca ototelik kişiliğin bu ilişkiyi zayıflattığı ve özellikle düşük öz-yeterlilik seviyelerinde yüksek ve düşük seviyedeki ototelik kişiliğin bireysel performans üzerinde farklı etkileri olduğu bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular yazın bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, M., KÖKSAL, O., ÇETİN, F. (2020). Does Autotelic Personality Make a Difference in The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Individual Performance?. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 271–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/92445

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aşçı, F. H., Çağlar, E., Eklund, R. C., Altıntaş A., ve Jackson, S. (2007). Durumluk ve Sürekli Optimal Performans Duygu Durum-2 Ölçeklerinin Uyarlama Çalışması. Hacettepe Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18 (4), 182-196.
  2. Bakker, A. B. (2008). The Work-Related Flow Inventory: Construction and Initial Validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400-414.
  3. Bakker, A. B., ve Demerouti, E. (2014).
  4. Job Demands-Resources Theory, Work and Wellbeing. Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide (Eds. P. Y. Chen, C. L. Cooper). Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 37-64.
  5. Bandura, A. (1977a). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Bandura, A. (1977b). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  6. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  7. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
  9. Bandura, A. (2013). Social Cognitive Theory. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Ed. E. H. Kessler). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 710-715.
  10. Bandura, A., ve Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of Self-Efficacy Theory of Behavioral Change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287-310.
  11. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., ve Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children's Aspirations and Career Trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.
  12. Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., ve Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of Affective Self-Regulatory Efficacy in Diverse Spheres of Psychosocial Functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769-782.
  13. Bandura, A., ve Cervone, D. (1983). Self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017-1028.
  14. Bandura, A., ve Locke, E, A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. Bandura S., ve Simon, K. M. (1977). The Role of Proximal Intentions in Self-Regulation of Refractory Behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(3), 177-193.
  15. Barling, J., ve Beattie, R. (1983). Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Sales Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5(1), 41-51.