Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

Spatial Panel Model and Kernel Estimation: A Case Study of Interactions in Money Growth

Mekansal Panel Model ve Kernel Tahmini: Para Büyümesi Etkileşimleri Örneği

Pages
777–804
Publication Date
2022-08-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that there is a spatial interaction between countries in terms of money growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the spatial interaction of monetary policy among the EU and OECD countries from 2007 to 2017, by focusing mainly on the money growth rates of the economies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effects of economic relationships on money growth have been analyzed using spatial panel models via alternative weight matrices designed to reflect geographic, economic,or institutional proximity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that there is a spatial interaction between countries in terms of money growth.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Para Politikası · Mekansal Model · Mekansal Etki

Abstract

This paper examines the spatial interaction of monetary policy among the EU and OECD countries from 2007 to 2017, by focusing mainly on the money growth rates of the economies. The effects of economic relationships on money growth have been analyzed using spatial panel models via alternative weight matrices designed to reflect geographic, economic,or institutional proximity. Our spatial analysis of the data revealed the existence of spatial interactions. The results show that there is a spatial interaction between countries in terms of money growth. Any change in money growth within this group of countries has a positive effect on the other countries according to their economic integration or geographical proximity. Moreover, the interaction between trading partners is larger than between geographically or institutionally close partners. On the other hand, we used nonparametric kernel regression to determine the response of money growth to money growth. It turns out that the interaction of money growth with export partners corresponds to an inverse parabolic function.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Avrupa Birliği (AB) ve/veya Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Teşkilatı (OECD) üyesi ülkelerin para büyüme oranları arasındaki mekânsal etkileşim 2007-2017 dönemi için ele alınmaktadır. Ekonomik ilişkilerin para büyümesi üzerindeki etkileri, coğrafi, ekonomik veya kurumsal yakınlığı yansıtmak için tasarlanmış alternatif ağırlık matrisleri aracılığıyla mekânsal panel modelleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, para büyümesi açısından ülkeler arasında mekânsal bir etkileşim olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu ülke grubundaki para arzında meydana gelecek pozitif yönlü herhangi bir değişiklik, ekonomik entegrasyonlarına veya coğrafi yakınlıklarına göre diğer ülkeler üzerinde olumlu bir etki yaratmaktadır sonucu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, ticaret partnerleri arasındaki etkileşim özellikle de ihracat partnerleri arasındaki etkileşim, coğrafi veya kurumsal olarak yakın ortaklar arasındaki etkileşimden daha büyük sonucuna da ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada para büyümesinin para büyümelerine tepkisini belirlemek ve şeklini ortaya koymak adına parametrik olmayan kernel regresyon modeli kullanılmıştır. Kernel regresyon modeli tahmini sonuçları ise, parasal büyümenin ihracat ortaklarıyla etkileşiminin ters bir parabolik fonksiyona karşılık geldiği ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, C., YALÇIN, Y., YÜCEL, E. (2022). Spatial Panel Model and Kernel Estimation: A Case Study of Interactions in Money Growth. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 777–804. https://ajindex.com/articles/922502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models First Edit, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Ariff, M., Chung, T. and Shamsher, M. (2012), Money supply, interest rate, liquidity and share prices: A test of their linkage, Global Finance Journal, Vol, 23, 202-220
  3. Asongu S.A., Folarin O.E., Biekpe N. (2018), The Long Run Stability of Money Demand in the Proposed West African Monetary Union, Research in International Business and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.11.001
  4. Aydin, Y., Dayiolu, T. and Guner, A. (2019), “Endogeneity of Money Supply: Theory and a Case of Turkey”, The Journal of International Social Research Volume: 12 Issue: 66, 1007-1012.
  5. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Bahmani, S., Kutan, A.M. and Xi, D. (2019), On the Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on the Demand for Money: Evidence from Emerging Economies, Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 18(1), pp.1–22
  6. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Miteza, I. and Tanku, A. (2020), Exchange rate changes and money demand in Albania: a nonlinear ARDL analysis, Economic Change and Restructuring, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-019-09261-9 Access Date: 06.06.2020
  7. Berument, M. H., Denaux, Z. and Yalcin, Y. (2012) Turkish monetary policy and components of aggregate demand: a VAR analysis with sign restrictions model, Applied Economics, 44:36, 4787-4798
  8. Bhattarai, K. (2011), Impact of exchange rate and money supply on growth, inflation and interest rates in the UK, International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Vol. 4(4), 355-371
  9. Capasso, S. and Napolitano, O. (2012), “Testing the Stability of Money Demand in Italy: Has the Euro Influenced the Monetary Transmission Mechanism?, Applied Economics, Vol. 44, pp: 3121–3133.
  10. Chaisrisawatsuk, S., Sharma, S. C., and Chowdhury, A. R., (2004) “Money demand stability under currency substitution: some recent evidence”, Applied Financial Economics, 14(1), pp. 19-27.
  11. Corrado, L. and Fingleton, B., (2012), “Where is the Economics in Spatial Econometrics?”, Journal of Regional Science, 52 (2): 210-239.
  12. Dabrowski, M.A, Papież, M. and Śmiech, S. (2015), Causal Relations between Nominal Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals in Central and Eastern European Countries, Economics of Transition, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 45-73
  13. Dominguez-Torres, H. and Hierro, L. A. (2019), Are there monetary clusters in Eurozone? The impact of ECB policy, Journal of Policy Modelling, 42, pp. 56-76.
  14. Elhorst, J. Paul (2010), “Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar”, Spati