SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: STEMES’18

Retraction: The Effects of Teaching Biotechnology and Cloning Issue with Cooperative Learning Model on Primary Pre-Service Teachers’ Argumentation Qualities

Geri Çekildi:Biyoteknoloji ve Klonlama Konusunun İşbirlikli Öğrenme Modeli ile Öğretiminin Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Argümantasyon Nitelikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Ayten ARSLAN
Nejla ATABEY
Pages
35–45
Publication Date
2018-12-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was defined that the cooperative learning model has a positive effect on the argumentation qualities related to biotechnology and cloning.This article was retracted on March 08, 2021. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/anemon/issue/60335/879239

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of teaching biotechnology and cloning issue with cooperative learning model (CLM) on the argumentation qualities of primary pre-service teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research group consisted of 40 pre-service teachers studying at Muş Alparslan University Faculty of Education in 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was defined that the cooperative learning model has a positive effect on the argumentation qualities related to biotechnology and cloning.This article was retracted on March 08, 2021. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/anemon/issue/60335/879239
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İşbirlikli Öğrenme Modeli · Sosyobilimsel Konular · Argümantasyon Niteliği

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of teaching biotechnology and cloning issue with cooperative learning model (CLM) on the argumentation qualities of primary pre-service teachers. The research group consisted of 40 pre-service teachers studying at Muş Alparslan University Faculty of Education in 2017-2018 academic year. Mixed method was used in the research. As a quantitative method, pre-test-post-test control group pattern was used, qualitatively semi-structured interviews were carried out. Data collection tools are a written argumentation form related to biotechnology and cloning issues and semi-structured interview form. As a result of the research, only significant differences were found for the jigsaw group in the analysis of the pre-test and post-test mean scores of the groups. In addition, it was defined that the cooperative learning model has a positive effect on the argumentation qualities related to biotechnology and cloning.This article was retracted on March 08, 2021. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/anemon/issue/60335/879239

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı işbirlikli öğrenme modeli ile (İÖM), biyoteknoloji ve klonlama ile ilgili sosyobilimsel konuların öğretiminin (SBK) sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının argümantasyon nitelikleri üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma grubunu 2017-2018 eğitim öğretim yılında Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 40 öğretmen adayı oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada karma yöntem kullanılmıştır. Nicel yöntem olarak ön test- son test kontrol gruplu desen kullanılırken, nitel olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Veri toplama araçları biyoteknoloji ve klonlama ile ilgili yazılı argümantasyon formu ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formudur. Araştırma sonucunda grupların kendi içlerinde ön test ve son test ortalama puanlarına yapılan analizlerde sadece jigsaw grubunda anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Öğretmen adayları ile yapılan görüşmelerin içerik analizi sonucunda işbirlikli öğrenme modelinin biyoteknoloji ve klonlama konusuna ilişkin argümantasyon nitelikleri üzerinde etkisinin olumlu olduğu belirlenmiştir.Bu makale 08-03-2021 tarihinde geri çekildi. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/anemon/issue/60335/879239

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, A., ATABEY, N. (2018). Retraction: The Effects of Teaching Biotechnology and Cloning Issue with Cooperative Learning Model on Primary Pre-Service Teachers’ Argumentation Qualities. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: STEMES’18, 35–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/922160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Albe, V. (2008). When scientificknowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientificissue. Research in ScienceEducation, 38, 67–90.
  2. Aronson, E. (2002). Building empathy, compassion, and achievement in the jigsaw classroom. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement. Impact of psychological factors on education,(ss. 209-225).
  3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  4. Arslan, A., & Zengin, R. (2016). Birlikte öğrenme yönteminin fen öğretimi laboratuar uygulamaları dersinde öğrenci tutumlarına etkisi. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 11(19), 81-94.
  5. Cahyarini, A,. Rahayu, S., & Yahmin. Y. (2016). The effect of 5E learning cycle instructional model using socioscientific issues (SSI) learning context on students’ critical thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesa, 5(2), 222-229.
  6. Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nitel veri analizi. Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Davidson, N., & O'Leary, P. W. (1990). How cooperative learning can enhance mastery teaching. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 30-34.
  8. Dawson, V. M., & Schibeci, R. A. (2003). West Australian high school students’ attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 7–12.
  9. Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009) High‐school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy.International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445.
  10. Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. (2013). The benefits of cooperative learning to socio-scientific discussion in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1533-1560.
  11. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., & Şimşek, U. (2005). İşbirlikli öğrenme yöntemi üzerine derleme: İşbirlikli öğreneme yöntemi ve yöntemle ilgili çalışmalar. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 59-83.
  12. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation:Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
  13. Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237.
  14. Johnson, D.W., & Johnston, J. (2003). Student motivation in Cooperative groups: Social interdependence theory. In: R.M. Gillies & A.F. Ashman (Eds.), Co-operative learning: The soci