Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1

A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN

Pages
21–28
Publication Date
2020-04-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The highest rate of change belongs to the HVPG group in terms of increasing the QF isometric muscle strength, therefore, we recommend that it is preferred in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study was planned to compare the effectiveness of high voltage pulsed galvanic (HVPG) stimulation, Russian current and isometric exercise on quadriceps femoris (QF) isometric muscle strengthd in healthy young women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The training was planned as HVPG current group (n=16), Russian current group (n=15) and isometric strengthening group (n=15).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The highest rate of change belongs to the HVPG group in terms of increasing the QF isometric muscle strength, therefore, we recommend that it is preferred in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Exercise · HVPG · Isometric force

Özet

Purpose: This study was planned to compare the effectiveness of high voltage pulsed galvanic (HVPG) stimulation, Russian current and isometric exercise on quadriceps femoris (QF) isometric muscle strengthd in healthy young women. Methods: Forty-six healthy young women were included in the study. Before and after the training, the dominant side QF isometric muscle strength of participants was assessed with the isokinetic dynamometer. The peak torque and average torques of the participants were recorded after the test. The training was planned as HVPG current group (n=16), Russian current group (n=15) and isometric strengthening group (n=15). All treatments were performed under physiotherapist supervision for a total of 15 sessions for 3 days a week for 5 weeks. Results: No statistical difference was found between the groups when the peak torque and average torque delta values were compared (p> 0.05). Conclusion: The highest rate of change belongs to the HVPG group in terms of increasing the QF isometric muscle strength, therefore, we recommend that it is preferred in clinical practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIK, B. B., KABUL, E. G., BUKE, M., UNVER, F., ALTUG, F. (2020). A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1, 21–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/918179

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Baskan E, Cavlak U, Yildiz HH. Comparison of electrical stimulation and isometric training on isokinetic strength of knee extensors: A randomized clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;27(1):11-15
  2. Maffiuletti NA, Zory R, Miotti D, Pellegrino MA, Jubeau M, Bottinelli R. Neuromuscular adaptations to elec¬trostimulation resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.2006; 85: 167 175. Miller M, Downham D, Lexell J. Superimposed single impulse and pulse train electrical stimulation: a quantitative assessment during submaximal isometric knee extension in young, healthy men. Muscle Nerve.1999; 22: 1038–1046.