SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 Sayı: 3

SENSORY PROCESSING IN PRETERM CHILDREN AT 5 YEARS OF AGE AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH SCHOOL READINESS

OKUL ÖNCESİ DÖNEMDE PRETERM ÇOCUKLARDA DUYUSAL İŞLEMLEME VE OKULA HAZIR OLUŞLA İLİŞKİSİ

Ramazan YİLDİZ
Ayse YİLDİZ
A.sebnem SOYSAL ACAR
Bulent ELBASAN
Pages
233–239
Publication Date
2020-12-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sensory processing disorders in preterm children may affect their school readiness at five years of age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aimed to determine the sensory profile of preterm children an to investigate the relationship between sensory processing and school readiness at five years of age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Seventy-six children aged 60–72 months (36 preterm children born <37 weeks of gestation and 40 age-matched term children) were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sensory processing disorders in preterm children may affect their school readiness at five years of age.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:preterm · okula hazır oluş · duyusal işlemleme

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the sensory profile of preterm children an to investigate the relationship between sensory processing and school readiness at five years of age. Methods: Seventy-six children aged 60–72 months (36 preterm children born <37 weeks of gestation and 40 age-matched term children) were enrolled in the study. Sensory processing was assessed using the Sensory Profile of Dunn, and school readiness was evaluated using the Marmara Primary School Readiness Scale. Results: Sensory processing scores of the preterm group were significantly lower than the term group (p<0.05) at five years of age. Sensory symptoms in preterm preschoolers were associated with school readiness (p<0.05). Total Sensory Profile score was a significant predictor for school readiness in preterms (p<0.05). Conclusion: Preterm children exhibited more sensory processing disorder than their term typical peers. Sensory processing disorders in preterm children may affect their school readiness at five years of age.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, okul öncesi dönemde preterm çocukların duyusal profilini belirlemek ve duyusal işleme ile okula hazır oluş arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktı. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 60-72 ay arası 76 çocuk (gestasyonel yaşı 37 haftadan küçük 36 preterm ve 40 term çocuk) dahil edildi. Duyusal işlemleme Dunn Duyu Profili ile değerlendirildi. Okula hazırlık durumu Marmara İlköğretim Okulu Hazır Oluş Ölçeği ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Okul öncesi dönemdeki preterm grubun duyusal işlemleme skorları term gruptan anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p<0,05). Preterm çocuklarda duyusal semptomlar okul hazırlığı ile ilişkiliydi (p<0,05). Total Duyu Profili skoru, pretermlerde okula hazır oluşun anlamlı bir belirleyicisiydi (p<0,05). Tartışma: Preterm çocuklar, akranlarından daha fazla duyusal semptom sergilediler. Beş yaşındaki preterm çocuklarda duyusal işlemleme bozuklukları, okula hazır olma durumlarını etkileyebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİLDİZ, R., YİLDİZ, A., ACAR, A. S., ELBASAN, B. (2020). SENSORY PROCESSING IN PRETERM CHILDREN AT 5 YEARS OF AGE AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH SCHOOL READINESS. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 3, 233–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/918153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. REFERENCES1. Buehler DM, Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Liederman J. Effectiveness of individualized developmental care for low-risk preterm infants: behavioral and electrophysiologic evidence. Pediatrics. 1995
  2. 96(5):923-32. 2. Miller LJ, Anzalone ME, Lane SJ, Cermak SA, Osten ET. Concept evolution in sensory integration: A proposed nosology for diagnosis. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2007
  3. 61(2):135. 3. DePaul D, Chambers SE. Environmental noise in the neonatal intensive care unit: Implications for nursing practice. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 1995
  4. 8(4):71-6. 4. Bart O, Shayevits S, Gabis L, Morag I. Prediction of participation and sensory modulation of late preterm infants at 12 months: A prospective study. Research in developmental disabilities. 2011
  5. 32(6):2732-8. 5. Dunn W. The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: A conceptual model. Infants and young children. 1997
  6. Lane KL, Givner CC, Pierson MR. Teacher expectations of student behavior: Social skills necessary for success in elementary school classrooms. The Journal of Special Education. 2004
  7. 38(2):104-10. 7. Dunn W. The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001
  8. 55(6):608-20. 8. Kayihan H, Akel BS, Salar S, Huri M, Karahan S, Turker D, et al. Development of a Turkish version of the sensory profile: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation. Perceptual and motor skills. 2015
  9. 120(3):971-86. 9. Polat Unutkan Ö. Marmara ilköğretime hazır oluş ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve standardizasyonu. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. 2003. 10. Eeles AL, Spittle AJ, Anderson PJ, Brown N, Lee KJ, Boyd RN, et al. Assessments of sensory processing in infants: a systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2013
  10. 55(4):314-26. 11. Wickremasinghe A, Rogers E, Johnson B, Shen A, Barkovich A, Marco E. Children born prematurely have atypical sensory profiles. Journal of Perinatology. 2013
  11. 33(8):631. 12. Adams JN, Feldman HM, Huffman LC, Loe IM. Sensory processing in preterm preschoolers and its association with executive function. Early human development. 2015
  12. 91(3):227-33. 13. Case-Smith J, Allen AS, Pratt PN. Occupational therapy for children: Mosby Toronto
  13. Bundy A, Bundy A, Lane S, Murray E. Using sensory integration theory in schoo