Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Effects of foot preference on postural control in soccer players

Pages
67–76
Publication Date
2023-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it was determined that leg dominance exhibited a symmetrical performance in terms of postural control.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A soccer player often uses the dominant leg during activities and the non-dominant leg is used to support body weight.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to compare the postural control performances of right- and left-footed amateur soccer players; secondly, it aimed to address the postural control differences between the dominant and non-dominant legs of soccer players.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it was determined that leg dominance exhibited a symmetrical performance in terms of postural control.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dominant · foot · non-dominant

Abstract

A soccer player often uses the dominant leg during activities and the non-dominant leg is used to support body weight. This may have different effects on the postural control between the dominant and non-dominant legs in soccer players. Detection of a possible asymmetry in postural control is important because a bilateral difference may be a contributing factor to injury. This study aimed to compare the postural control performances of right- and left-footed amateur soccer players; secondly, it aimed to address the postural control differences between the dominant and non-dominant legs of soccer players. Twenty-four healthy male soccer players were divided into two different groups (right foot dominant = 12, left foot dominant = 12). Dynamic postural control scores of soccer players in dominant and non-dominant single-stances were measured under two sensory conditions (eyes open and eyes closed) using the Biodex Balance System. In the comparison of two independent groups according to the normality distribution, the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for independent samples. The t-test for dependent samples and the Wilcoxon test were used to compare dependent groups. The results of the study; whether the players are right-footed or left-footed in both eye-open and eye-closed conditions does not affect their postural control performance; showed that the postural control performance of the dominant leg was higher than the non-dominant leg in the eye-open condition of all soccer players regardless of right and left legs. Therefore, it was determined that leg dominance exhibited a symmetrical performance in terms of postural control.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAOĞLU, Y., GİRGİN, Y. (2023). Effects of foot preference on postural control in soccer players. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 67–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/913780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adlerton, A. K., Moritz, U., & Moe-Nilssen, R. (2003). Force plate and accelerometer measures for evaluating the effect of muscle fatigue on postural control during one-legged stance. Physiother Res Int, 8, 187-199.
  2. Akça, F., Çekin, R., & Ziyagil, M.A. (2015). Effects of hand dominance on overarm shooting accuracy in young males. CBÜ-BESBD, 10(2), 1-8.
  3. Bale, P., & Scholes, S. (1986). Lateral dominance and basketball performance. J Hum Mov Stud, 12(1), 145-151.
  4. Barone, R., Macaluso, F., Traina, M., Leonardi, V., Farina, F., & Di Felice, V. (2011). Soccer players have a better standing balance in nondominant one-legged stance. Open Access J Sports Med, 2, 1-6. Belmont L., & Birch, H. G. (1963). Lateral dominance and right-left awareness in normal children. Child Dev, 34, 257-70.
  5. Bigoni, M., Turati, M., Gandolla, M., Augusti, C. A., Pedrocchi, A., La Torre, A., Piatti, M., & Gaddi, D. (2017). Balance in young male soccer players: Dominant versus non-dominant leg. Sport Sci Health, 13(2), 253-258.
  6. Booysen, M. J., Gradidge, P. J. L., & Watson, E. (2015). The relationships of eccentric strength and power with dynamic balance in male footballers. J Sports Sci, 33(20), 2157-2165.
  7. Cachupe, W., Shifflett, B., Kahanov, L., & Wughalter, E. (2001). Reliability of Biodex Balance System measures. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci, 5(2), 97-108.
  8. Chew-Bullock, T. S., Anderson, D. I., Hamel, K. A., Gorelick, M. L., Wallace, S. A., & Sidaway, B. (2012). Kicking performance in relation to balance ability over the support leg. Hum Mov Sci, 31, 1615-1623.
  9. Dane, Ş., & Balcı, N. (2007). Handedness, eyedness and nasal cycle in children with autism. Int J Neurosci, 25(4), 223-226.
  10. Erkmen, N., Suveren, S., Göktepe, A. S., & Yazicioğlu, K. (2007). The comparison of balance performance of the athletes who are in different branches. Spormetre the Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 5(3), 115-122.
  11. Fransson, P. A., Kristinsdottri, E. K., Hafstrom, A., Magnusson, M. & Johansson, R. (2004). Balance control and adaptation during vibratory perturbations in middle-aged and elderly humans. European J Appl Physiol, 91, 595–603.
  12. Gabbard, C. (1993). Foot laterality during childhood: A review. Int J Neurosci, 72, 175-182.
  13. Gabbard, C., & Bonfigli D., (1999). Foot laterality in four-year olds. Percept Mot Ski, 65, 943-946.
  14. Gentry, V., & Gabbard, C. (1995). Foot-preference behavior: a developmental perspective. J Gen Psychol, 122(1), 37-45.
  15. Gerbino, P. G., Griffin, E. D., & Zurakowski, D. (2007