Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 4

Dual-task performance after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of mobility and dynamic balance

Elif Aygun Polat(Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu, Türkiye.)0000-0001-9634-0728
Yunus Emre Özbilen(Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Türkiye.)
Yusuf Polat(Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Türkiye.)0000-0002-1650-9712
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For TUG, the revision TKA group had poorer overall performance than the primary TKA group (p=0.029), but the condition-by-group interaction was not significant (p=0.799).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to compare functional mobility and dynamic balance under single-task and dual-task conditions in patients after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA, and to examine dual-task cost as an indicator of motor performance deterioration under cognitive load.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this cross-sectional comparative study, 80 patients aged 55 years or older who had undergone primary TKA (n=40) or revision TKA (n=40) at least 12 months previously were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For TUG, the revision TKA group had poorer overall performance than the primary TKA group (p=0.029), but the condition-by-group interaction was not significant (p=0.799).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dual-task · dual-task cost · dynamic balance

Abstract

This study aimed to compare functional mobility and dynamic balance under single-task and dual-task conditions in patients after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA, and to examine dual-task cost as an indicator of motor performance deterioration under cognitive load. In this cross-sectional comparative study, 80 patients aged 55 years or older who had undergone primary TKA (n=40) or revision TKA (n=40) at least 12 months previously were evaluated. Functional mobility and dynamic balance were assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and the Four Square Step Test (FSST) under single-task and dual-task conditions. Under dual-task conditions, participants simultaneously counted backward aloud by twos from a randomly selected number below 100. The revision TKA group showed worse unadjusted performance in single-task TUG (13.37±3.93 vs 11.64±2.13 s, p=0.017) and dual-task FSST (17.57±5.55 vs 14.86±3.94 s, p=0.014). After adjustment for age and sex, dual-tasking significantly worsened performance in both TUG and FSST (both p<0.001). For TUG, the revision TKA group had poorer overall performance than the primary TKA group (p=0.029), but the condition-by-group interaction was not significant (p=0.799). For FSST, both the between-group difference (p=0.033) and the condition-by-group interaction were significant (p=0.001), indicating a greater adverse effect of cognitive load in the revision TKA group. FSST dual-task cost was significantly higher in the revision TKA group than in the primary TKA group (16.39±13.82% vs 6.59±13.72%, p=0.002), whereas TUG dual-task cost did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.604). These findings suggest that dual-task multidirectional stepping may be more sensitive than general mobility testing for detecting residual functional deficits after revision TKA. Dual-task FSST may therefore be a useful clinical assessment tool for identifying persistent balance-related limitations after revision TKA.

🔖

Cite This Article

Polat, E. A., Özbilen, Y. E., Polat, Y. (2026). Dual-task performance after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of mobility and dynamic balance. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Volume: 12 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.1938084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Alzaid, H., Ethofer, T., Kardatzki, B., Erb, M., Scheffler, K., Berg, D.,…Hobert, M. A. (2022). Gait decline while dual-tasking is an early sign of white matter deterioration in middle-aged and older adults. Front Aging Neurosci, 14, 934241. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.934241
  2. Azzam, I., Rozen, N., Eliyahu, A., Dabby, D., Elbaz, A., Mor, A., & Krasovsky, T. (2024). The effect of total knee replacement on dual–task gait performance in older adults. Physical Ther, 104(8), pzae067. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae067
  3. Cui, A., Li, H., Wang, D., Zhong, J., Chen, Y., & Lu, H. (2020). Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine, 29–30, 100587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587
  4. di Laura Frattura, G., Filardo, G., Giunchi, D., Fusco, A., Zaffagnini, S., & Candrian, C. (2018). Risk of falls in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. J Orthop, 15(3), 903-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.026
  5. Dite, W., & Temple, V. A. (2002). A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83(11), 1566-1571. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35469
  6. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods, 39(2), 175-191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146
  7. Güngen, C., Ertan, T., Eker, E., Yaşar, R., & Engin, F. (2002). Reliability and validity of the Standardized Mini Mental State Examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in Turkish population. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 13(4), 273-281.
  8. Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short‐form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf‐mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form‐36 bodily pain scale (sf‐36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (icoap). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 63(S11), S240-S252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543
  9. Kalkan, S., Ünver, B., & Karatosun, V. (2026). Comparison of postoperative balance and function between primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop, 71, 269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.050
  10. Karimijashni, M., Yoo, S., Barnes, K., Lessard‐Dostie, H., Dabbagh, A., Ramsay, T., & Poitras, S. (2025). Postoperative rehabilitation interventions in patients at risk of poorer outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care, 23(1), e70054. doi: 10.1002/msc.70054
  11. Moore, M., & Barker, K. (2017). The validity and reliability of the four square step test in different adult populations: a systematic review. Syst Rev, 6(1), 187. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5
  12. Moutzouri, M., Gleeson, N., Billis, E., Tsepis, E., Panoutsopoulou, I., & Gliatis, J. (2017). The effect of total knee arthroplasty on patients’ balance and incidence of falls: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25(11), 3439-3451. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4355-z
  13. Özcan, D., Unver, B., & Karatosun, V. (2025). Balance assessment under dual task conditions in patients with total knee arthroplasty: a test-retest reliability and concurrent validity study. Physiother Theory Pract, 41(1), 93-98. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2321222
  14. Özden, F., Yalçın, M., Uysal, İ., Işık, E. İ., Sarı, Z., & Baser, M. (2025). Effectiveness of dual-task training in older adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Ir J Med Sci, 195(2), 745–753. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04212-y
  15. Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. (1991). The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc, 39(2), 142-148. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
  16. Salimy, M. S., Paschalidis, A., Dunahoe, J. A., Chen, A. F., Alpaugh, K., Bedair, H. S., & Melnic, C. M. (2024). Patients consistently report worse outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty compared to primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 39(2), 459-465.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.014
  17. Shichman, I., Askew, N., Habibi, A., Nherera, L., Macaulay, W., Seyler, T., & Schwarzkopf, R. (2023). Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2040-2060. Arthroplast Today, 21, 101152. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101152
  18. Skou, S. T., Roos, E. M., Laursen, M. B., Rathleff, M. S., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Simonsen, O., & Rasmussen, S. (2015). A randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Engl J Med, 373(17), 1597-1606. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505467
  19. Steinmetz, J. D., Culbreth, G. T., Haile, L. M., Rafferty, Q., Lo, J., Fukutaki, K. G.,…Brooks, P. M. (2023). Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol, 5(9), e508-e522. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00163-7
  20. Tuğay, B. U., Tuğay, N., Güney, H., Kınıklı, G. İ., Yüksel, İ., & Atilla, B. (2016). Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 50(2), 198–206. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0127
  21. Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture, 16(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00156-4