Journals / Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Retrospective Analysis of Follow-up and Results of Patients with High D-Dimer Value and Discharged without Emergency Pathology

Pages
135–140
Publication Date
2023-04-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions In conclusion, both morbidity and mortality rates were found to be significantly higher in the D-dimer positive group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background This study aimed to retrospectively examine the morbidity and mortality rates after discharge of patients who applied to the emergency department with high D-dimer values but had no pathology upon evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods Patients over the age of 18 who applied to Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine Emergency Department with preliminary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a two-year period between January 2018 and December 2019 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions In conclusion, both morbidity and mortality rates were found to be significantly higher in the D-dimer positive group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Emergency Service · Pulmonary Embolism · D-dimer

Abstract

Background This study aimed to retrospectively examine the morbidity and mortality rates after discharge of patients who applied to the emergency department with high D-dimer values but had no pathology upon evaluation. Material and Methods Patients over the age of 18 who applied to Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine Emergency Department with preliminary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a two-year period between January 2018 and December 2019 were included in the study. The patient group consisted of cases with high D-dimer levels while the control group inluded patients with negative D-dimer and no pathology on discharge. Results A total of 594 cases; 297 D-dimer positive (+) and 297 D-dimer negative (-), were included in the study. A significant difference existed between the percentage of patients developing illness post-discharge in the D-dimer (+) 18.86% (n=56) and D-dimer (-) 1.68% (n=5) groups, respectively. The most common illness identified in the dimer (+) group after discharge up was pneumonia (n=11), followed by Coronary Artery Disease (n=5). Death rate was 1.68% (n=5) in the D-dimer (-) group and 11.78% (n=35) in the D-dimer (+) group; a statistically significant difference (p=0.001). Conclusions In conclusion, both morbidity and mortality rates were found to be significantly higher in the D-dimer positive group.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAVAL, F. B., ÇIKRIKLAR, H. İ., DURAK, V. A., OMAR, I., KURTOĞLU, B., ARMAGAN, E. (2023). Retrospective Analysis of Follow-up and Results of Patients with High D-Dimer Value and Discharged without Emergency Pathology. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 135–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/913768

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Robert-Ebadi H, Righini M. D-dimer: Well beyond diagnosis! J Med Vasc. 2020 Sep;45(5):239-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2020.06.006. Lim W, Le Gal G, Bates SM, Righini M, Haramati LB, Lang E, Kline JA, Chasteen S, Snyder M, Patel P, Bhatt M, Patel P, Braun C, Begum H, Wiercioch W, Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3226-56. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024828. Iwuji K, Almekdash H, Nugent KM, Islam E, Hyde B, Kopel J, Opiegbe A, Appiah D. Age-adjusted D-dimer in the prediction of pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211054996. doi: 10.1177/21501327211054996. Crawford F, Andras A, Welch K, Sheares K, Keeling D, Chappell FM. D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;2016(8):CD010864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010864.pub2. Senior K, Burles K, Wang D, Grigat D, Innes GD, Andruchow JE, Lang ES, McRae AD. Age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds in the investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism: A retrospective evaluation in patients ages 50 and older using administrative data. CJEM. 2018 Sep;20(5):725-31. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.389. Turak O, Canpolat U, Ozcan F, Yayla C, Mendi MA, Oksüz F, Tok D, Tok D, Cağlı K, Gölbaşı Z. D-dimer level predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with infective endocarditis: a prospective single-centre study. Thromb Res. 2014 Sep;134(3):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.06.015. Mélé N, Turc G. Stroke associated with recent mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: A systematic review of clinical features and presumed pathophysiological mechanisms. Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 21;9:1109. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01109. Yao J, Bai T, Yang B, Sun L. The diagnostic value of D-dimer in acute aortic dissection: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov 27;16(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01726-1.
  2. Sakka M, Connors JM, Hékimian G, Martin-Toutain I, Crichi B, Colmegna I, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Farge D, Frere C. Association between D-Dimer levels and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Med Vasc. 2020 Sep;45(5):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2020.05.003. Yang C, Zeng HH, Huang J, Zhang QY, Lin K. Predictive roles of D-dimer for mortality of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-an