Journals / Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 8

Can the Glasgow-Blatchford Score Determine the Appropriateness of Interhospital Referral?

Remzi Ekici(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANKARA GÜLHANE SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0002-3346-4851
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A prospective multicentre study incorporating all patients assessed at referring hospitals, prespecified independent adjudication, and centre-level resource data would better distinguish patient-level bleeding risk from system-level determinants of transfer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This correspondence discusses the use of the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) to assess the appropriateness of interhospital referral in suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding, as reported by Ünal and Coşgun in this journal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bleeding-related risk and the need for transfer are distinct constructs: referral decisions also depend on local endoscopic capacity, staffing, and access to blood products.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A prospective multicentre study incorporating all patients assessed at referring hospitals, prespecified independent adjudication, and centre-level resource data would better distinguish patient-level bleeding risk from system-level determinants of transfer.
🔬Design:Letter to Editor
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glasgow-Blatchford score · Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · Interhospital referral

Abstract

This correspondence discusses the use of the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) to assess the appropriateness of interhospital referral in suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding, as reported by Ünal and Coşgun in this journal. Bleeding-related risk and the need for transfer are distinct constructs: referral decisions also depend on local endoscopic capacity, staffing, and access to blood products. Interpretation of the reported findings is limited by retrospective adjudication of referral appropriateness, inclusion of referred patients only, incomplete assessment of the outcomes the GBS was developed to predict, and the absence of confidence intervals for discrimination estimates. Clarification of mortality event coding and reporting inconsistencies would also improve interpretability. A prospective multicentre study incorporating all patients assessed at referring hospitals, prespecified independent adjudication, and centre-level resource data would better distinguish patient-level bleeding risk from system-level determinants of transfer.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ekici, R. (2026). Can the Glasgow-Blatchford Score Determine the Appropriateness of Interhospital Referral?. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine, Volume: 8. https://ajindex.com/articles/1556585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ünal D, Coşgun S. Retrospective evaluation of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: impact on inappropriate referrals and unnecessary healthcare costs. Turk J Int Med. 2026;8:13. doi:10.46310/tjim.1938255.
  2. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000;356(9238):1318-21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02816-6.
  3. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6432. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6432.
  4. Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG clinical guideline: upper gastrointestinal and ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(5):899-917. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.
  5. Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, Camus M, Lau J, Lanas A, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021;53(3):300-32. doi:10.1055/a-1369-5274.