SavedAdd your journal

Journals / SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4

THE EFFECT OF PAROTID GLAND VOLUME AND TARGET VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS ON PAROTID GLAND DOSE IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER

BAŞ-BOYUN KANSERİ YOĞUNLUK AYARLI RADYOTERAPİSİNDE PAROTİS BEZİ HACMİ VE HEDEF HACİM İLİŞKİLERİNİN PAROTİS BEZİ DOZUNA ETKİSİ

Alper Özseven(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6128-6426
Zümrüt Arda Kaymak(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7284-008X
Emine Elif Özkan(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9168-3756
İbrahim Çobanbaş(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0813-628X
Pages
655–661
Publication Date
2021-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion To keep the mean dose of the parotid gland below 26 Gy, radiation oncologist should pay attention to keep the volume ratio of the parotid gland overlapping with PTV below 2.8%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective To investigate the effect of parotid and target volume relationships on the radiation dose to be received by the parotid in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After contouring, the cranio-caudal length (CCL) of the right and left parotids, the parotid volume (Vparotis), the planning target volume (PTV) dose overlapping with the parotids, the CCL of the right and left parotid overlapping with the PTV 70 target, the maximum PTV dose at parotid level but not overlapping with parotids and the ratio of the parotid volume overlapping with PTV to the total parotid volume were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion To keep the mean dose of the parotid gland below 26 Gy, radiation oncologist should pay attention to keep the volume ratio of the parotid gland overlapping with PTV below 2.8%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Baş-boyun kanseri · parotis bezi · yoğunluk ayarlı radyoterapi

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of parotid and target volume relationships on the radiation dose to be received by the parotid in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Material and Methods Fifty patients were randomly selected from the patients who underwent curative, definitive or postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy with the diagnosis of head and neck cancer. After contouring, the cranio-caudal length (CCL) of the right and left parotids, the parotid volume (Vparotis), the planning target volume (PTV) dose overlapping with the parotids, the CCL of the right and left parotid overlapping with the PTV 70 target, the maximum PTV dose at parotid level but not overlapping with parotids and the ratio of the parotid volume overlapping with PTV to the total parotid volume were recorded. In addition, it was recorded whether there was a PTV70 volume in the slices at parotid level and whether it was located unilaterally or bilaterally. After the intensity modulated radiation therapy planning, by using dose-volume histograms, mean parotid gland dose (Dmean), volume ratio of parotid gland that received 20 Gy and more doses (V20), and volume ratio of parotid gland that received 30 Gy and more doses (V30) were measured. The factors that may affect the mean parotid dose above 26 Gy were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off value. Results The median Dmean, V20 and V30 value of all parotid glands was 26.55 Gy (14.74-66.78), 50.91% (26.53- 100) and 32.21% (7.12-100), respectively. The parotid gland volume was found to be statistically significant higher in the group with Dmean>26Gy (p=0.027). In the group with Dmean>26Gy, the ratio of the volume of the parotid gland overlapping with the PTV to the entire parotid gland was significantly higher (1.25% vs. 7.06%, p 26Gy, was found to be 2.8%. Conclusion To keep the mean dose of the parotid gland below 26 Gy, radiation oncologist should pay attention to keep the volume ratio of the parotid gland overlapping with PTV below 2.8%.

Özet

Amaç Baş-boyun kanseri radyoterapisinde, parotis ve hedef hacim ilişkilerinin, parotisin alacağı radyasyon dozu üzerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem Baş-boyun bölgesi kanserleri tanısı ile küratif, definitif veya postoperatif adjuvan radyoterapi uygulanmış hastalardan rastgele 50 hasta seçildi. Konturlama sonrası her hastanın sağ ve sol parotislerinin ayrı ayrı kraniyo-kaudal uzunluğu (KKU), parotis hacmi (Vparotis), parotis ile kesişen planlanan hedef hacim (PTV) dozu, sağ ve sol parotisin ayrı ayrı PTV70 hedefi ile örtüşen KKU, parotis seviyesinde olan fakat parotis ile kesişmeyen maksimum PTV dozu ve parotisin PTV ile kesişen hacminin toplam parotis hacmine oranı kaydedildi. Ayrıca, parotis seviyesindeki kesitlerde PTV70 hacminin olup-olmadığı; var ise yerleşiminin tek taraflı mı veya bilateral olup-olmadığı kaydedildi. Yoğunluk ayarlı radyoterapi planlaması sonrası, doz-hacim histogramları kullanılarak ortalama parotis dozu (Dmean), 20 Gy ve üstü doz alan parotis hacmi oranı (V20) ve 30 Gy ve üstü doz alan parotis hacmi oranı (V30) değerleri ölçüldü. Ortalama parotis dozunun 26 Gy üstünde olmasına etki edebilecek faktörler lojistik regresyon analizi ile incelendi. Sınır değer belirleme amacıyla Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) eğrisi analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular Tüm parotislerin ortanca Dmean, V20 ve V30 değerleri sırasıyla, 26,55 Gy (14,74-66,78), %50,91 (26,53- 100) ve %32,21 (7,12-100) idi. Dmean>26Gy olan grupta, parotis hacmi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yüksek bulundu (p=0,027). Dmean>26Gy olan grupta, parotisin PTV ile kesişen hacminin tüm parotise oranı belirgin yüksekti (%1,25 karşın %7,06, p 26Gy olma ihtimalini en iyi gösterecek PTV ile kesişen parotis hacmi oranının sınır değerini tespit etmek için yapılan ROC analizi sonucunda, sınır değer %2,8 olarak bulundu. Sonuç Parotis ortalama dozunu 26 Gy altında tutmak adına, radyasyon onkoloğu konturlama aşamasında, PTV ile kesişen parotis hacmini %2,8 altında tutmaya çalışması faydalı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özseven, A., Kaymak, Z. A., Özkan, E. E., Çobanbaş, İ. (2021). THE EFFECT OF PAROTID GLAND VOLUME AND TARGET VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS ON PAROTID GLAND DOSE IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 655–661. https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.981789

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward, E. Cancer statistics 2010. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2010; 60: 277–23. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20073
  2. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:524–48. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
  3. Beech N, Robinson S, Porceddu S, Batstone M. Dental management of patients irradiated for head and neck cancer. Aust Dent J. 2014;59:20-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12134
  4. Deasy JO, Moiseenko V, Marks L, Chao KS, Nam J, Eisbruch A. Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76 (3 Suppl):S58-S63. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.090
  5. De Sanctis V, Bossi P, Sanguineti G, Trippa F, Ferrari D, Bacigalupo A, et al. Mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and systemic therapies: literature review and consensus statements. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 100: 147-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.010
  6. Yeh SA. Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Semin Plast Surg. 2010; 24:127-36. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255330
  7. Ozseven A & Kara Ü. Verification of Percentage Depth-Doses with Monte Carlo Simulation and Calculation of Mass Attenuation Coefficients for Various Patient Tissues in Radiation Therapy. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Health Sciences 2020; 11: 224-6. [8] Palta JR & Mackie TR. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy—the state of the art. Madison (WI): Medical Physics Publishing; 2003.
  8. Keçeci A, Özdemir F. Ağız kuruluğunun etiyolojisi ve tedavisinde günümüzdeki yaklaşım. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005; 12(4): 58-67.
  9. Millunchick CH, Zhen H, Redler G, Liao Y, Turian JV. A model for predicting the dose to the parotid glands based on their relative overlapping with planning target volumes during helical radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(2):48-53. doi:10.1002/acm2.12203
  10. Ugurlu M, Ozkan EE, Ozseven A. The effect of ionizing radiation on properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Braz Oral Res. 2020; 34:e005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0005
  11. Stephens LC, Schultheiss TE, Price RE, Ang KK, Peters LJ. Radiation apoptosis of serous acinar cells of salivary and lacrimal glands. Cancer. 1991; 67:1539–4
  12. Harrison LB, Zelefsky MJ, Pfister D, Carper E, Raben A, Kraus DH, et al. Detailed quality of life assessment in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the base of the tongue. Head Neck. 1997;19:169–175.
  13. Eisbruch A, Rhodus N, Rosenthal D, Murphy B, Rasch C, Sonis S, et al. How should we measure and report radiotherapy-induced xerostomia? Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13:226–234.
  14. Chao KS, Deasy JO, Markman J, Haynie J, Perez CA, Purdy JA, et al. A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:907–916.
  15. Stock M, Dörr W, Stromberger C, Mock U, Koizar S, Pötter R, et al. Investigations on parotid gland recovery after IMRT in head and neck tumor patients. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010;186(12):665-671. doi:10.1007/s00066-010-2157-7
  16. Roesink JM, Moerland MA, Battermann JJ, Hordijk GJ, Terhaard Chris HJ. Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:938–946.
  17. Eisbruch A, Ten H, Randall K, Kim HM, Marsh LH, Ship JA. Dose, volumes, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:577–587.
  18. Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, Urbano TG, Bhide SA, Clark C, et al. Parotid‑sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): A phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:127‑36.
  19. Bjordal K, Kaasa S, Mastekaasa A. Quality of life in patients treated for head and neck cancer: A follow‑up study 7 to 11 years after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;28:847‑56.
  20. Gensheimer MF, Hummel-Kramer SM, Cain D, Quang TS. Simple tool for prediction of parotid gland sparing in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2015;40:232–234.
  21. Hunt MA, Jackson A, Narayana A, Lee N. Geometric factors influencing dosimetric sparing of the parotid glands using IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:296–304.
  22. Blanco AI, Chao KS, El Naqa I, Franklin GE, Zakarian K, Vicic M, et al. Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 62:1055–1069
  23. Saarilahti K, Kouri M, Collan J, Kangasmäki A, Atula T, Joensuu H, et al. Sparing of the submandibular glands by intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006 Mar;78(3):270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.02.017. Epub 2006 Mar 27. Erratum in: Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jul;80(1):107-8. PMID: 16564589.
  24. Ozseven A & Kara Ü. Verification of Percentage Depth-Doses with Monte Carlo Simulation and Calculation of Mass Attenuation Coefficients for Various Patient Tissues in Radiation Therapy. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Health Sciences 2020; 11: 224-6.
  25. Keçeci A, Özdemir F. Ağız kuruluğunun etiyolojisi ve tedavisinde günümüzdeki yaklaşım. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005; 12(4): 58-67.