Journals / Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Chromium Use in Leather Industry and Chromium Removal by Biological Methods

Deri Endüstrisinde Krom Kullanımı ve Biyolojik Yöntemlerle Krom Giderimi

Pages
1006–1029
Publication Date
2023-03-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the importance of reducing the highly toxic Cr(VI), which is used effectively in many branches of industry, to less toxic Cr(III) by microbial methods has been tried to be emphasized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a result of industrial activities, agricultural, and domestic wastes, there are sometimes traces and sometimes high concentrations of metals in wastewater.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In case the wastewater generated as a result of leather processing is given to the receiving environment without being treated, clean water resources are polluted and its use is restricted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the importance of reducing the highly toxic Cr(VI), which is used effectively in many branches of industry, to less toxic Cr(III) by microbial methods has been tried to be emphasized.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deri Endüstrisi · Krom · Biyoremediasyon

Abstract

As a result of industrial activities, agricultural, and domestic wastes, there are sometimes traces and sometimes high concentrations of metals in wastewater. Metals being dissolved in water or collected at the bottom of the water cause chemical pollution and environmental pollution and pose a threat to the health of living things. A large amount of water is used in the leather industry, and the resulting wastewater contains high levels of pollutants. In case the wastewater generated as a result of leather processing is given to the receiving environment without being treated, clean water resources are polluted and its use is restricted. For this reason, it is very important to eliminate and/or eliminate the harmful effects of wastewater with appropriate techniques before it is discharged into the environment. While physical and chemical methods are used effectively in the removal of heavy metals from wastewater, the removal process by biological methods has also become widespread, especially in recent years. The biological decomposition of pollutants by microorganisms and their conversion to compounds that are less harmful to the environment form the basis of the biological removal process. In this review, the importance of reducing the highly toxic Cr(VI), which is used effectively in many branches of industry, to less toxic Cr(III) by microbial methods has been tried to be emphasized.

Özet

Endüstriyel faaliyetler, zirai ve evsel atıklar sonucu atık sularda bazen eser miktarda bazen de yüksek konsantrasyonda metaller bulunmaktadır. Metaller sularda çözünmüş halde bulunarak ya da su dibinde toplanarak kimyasal kirliliğe ve de çevre kirliliğine neden olmakta ve canlı sağlığı için de tehdit oluşturmaktadır. Deri sanayinde fazla miktarda su kullanılmakta olup, oluşan atık sular yüksek oranda kirletici madde içermektedir. Deri işleme sonucu oluşan atık suyun arıtılmadan alıcı ortama verilmesi durumunda, temiz su kaynakları kirlenmekte ve kullanımı kısıtlanmaktadır. Bu nedenle atık sularının, çevreye deşarj edilmeden önce uygun tekniklerle bertaraf edilip zararlı etkisinin azaltılması ve/veya giderilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Atık sulardan ağır metallerin uzaklaştırılmasında fiziksel ve kimyasal yöntemler etkin olarak kullanılırken, özellikle son yıllarda biyolojik yöntemlerle giderim işlemi de yaygınlık kazanmıştır. Kirleticilerin mikroorganizmalar tarafından biyolojik olarak parçalanarak, çevreye daha az zararlı bileşiklere dönüştürülmesi biyolojik yöntemlerle uzaklaştırma işleminin temelini oluşturmaktadır. Bu derleme çalışmasında, endüstrinin birçok dalında etkin olarak kullanılan yüksek toksik özellikteki Cr(VI)’nın mikrobiyal yöntemler ile daha az toksik Cr(III)’e indirgenmesinin önemi vurgulanmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, B. Ç., YUKSEKDAG, Z. (2023). Chromium Use in Leather Industry and Chromium Removal by Biological Methods. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1006–1029. https://ajindex.com/articles/911850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abalı Y., Öztekin B., Çanlı M., Şirin K. Deri sanayi atık sularından krom (VI) iyonunun adsorbsiyonu. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2014; 10(1), 11-24. ISSN 1305-1385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18466/cbufbe.36355.
  2. Abbaszadeh-Dahaji P., Omidvari M., Ghorbanpour M. Increasing phytoremediation efficiency of heavy metal-contaminated soil using PGPR for sustainable agriculture. In Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture; Choudhary, D.K., Varma, A., Tuteja, N., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India 2016; 187-204. 91. Abinandan S., Subashchandrabose S.R., Venkateswarlu K., Perera I.A., Megharaj M. Acid-tolerant microalgae can withstand higher concentrations of invasive cadmium and produce sustainable biomass and biodiesel at pH 3,5. Bioresource Technology 2019; 281, 469-473. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.001. Aggarwal R., Saini D., Sonkar S.K., Sonker A.K., Westman G. Sunlight promoted removal of toxic hexavalent chromium by cellulose derived photoactive carbon dots. Chemosphere 2022; 287, 3, 132287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132287.
  3. Agrawal R., Singh R., Verma A., Panwar P., Verma A.K. Partial purification and characterization of alkaline protease from Bacillus sp. isolated from soil. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2012; 8(1), 129-133. ISSN 1817-3047. Ahemad M. Bacterial mechanisms for Cr(VI) resistance and reduction: An overview and recent advances. Folia Microbiologica 2014; 59(4), 321-332. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-014-0304-8.
  4. Ahmad W.A., Venil C.K., Chirwa E.M.N., Wang Y.T., Sani M.H., Samad A.F.A., Kamaroddin M.F.A., Donati E.R., Urbieta M.S., Zakaria Z.A. Bacterial reduction of Cr(VI): Operational challenges and feasibility. Current Pollution Reports 2021; 7: 115-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00174-8.
  5. Al-Dhabi N.A., Arasu M.V. Biosorption of hazardous waste from the municipal wastewater by marine algal biomass. Environmental Research 2022; 204, 112115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112115.
  6. Ali H., Khan E., Sajad M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals-Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013; 91(7), 869-881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.075.
  7. Ayele A., Godeto Y.G. Bioremediation of Chromium by Microorganisms and Its Mechanisms Related to Functional Groups. Hindawi Journal of Chemistry 2021; Article ID 7694157, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7694157.
  8. Bai Y.N., Luc Y.Z., Shenc N., Lau T.C., Zeng R.J. Investigation of Cr(VI) reduction potenti