Journals / Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

How Social Democrats Have Reacted to Migrants: Turkish and German Samples

Sosyal Demokratların Göçmenlere Yaklaşımı: Türk ve Alman Örnekleri

Pages
20–33
Publication Date
2023-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, how the different conjunctures in the two countries affected the universal claims of social democracy and how these two different social democratic parties took positions within the scope of these effects were also evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the discourses of the CHP and the SPD on Syrian migrants were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study which was carried out for this purpose, firstly, the migration narrative of Turkey and Germany were defined, and then SPD and CHP’s position on this issue were discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, how the different conjunctures in the two countries affected the universal claims of social democracy and how these two different social democratic parties took positions within the scope of these effects were also evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CHP · SPD · Göç

Abstract

In this study, the discourses of the CHP and the SPD on Syrian migrants were evaluated. In this study which was carried out for this purpose, firstly, the migration narrative of Turkey and Germany were defined, and then SPD and CHP’s position on this issue were discussed. In this respect, the CHP’s and SPD’s discourses in the media and some of their party documents had been evaluated within path dependency theory. In this context, how the different conjunctures in the two countries affected the universal claims of social democracy and how these two different social democratic parties took positions within the scope of these effects were also evaluated.

Özet

Bu çalışmada CHP ve SPD'nin Suriyeli göçmenlere yönelik söylemleri değerlendirilmektedir. Bu amaçla gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada öncelikle Türkiye ve Almanya'nın göç anlatısı tanımlanmış, ardından SPD ve CHP'nin bu konudaki duruşu ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda CHP ve SPD'nin medyadaki söylemleri ve bazı parti belgeleri yol bağımlılığı teorisi kapsamında değerlendirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda iki ülkedeki farklı konjonktürlerin sosyal demokrasinin evrensel iddialarını nasıl etkilediği ve bu iki farklı sosyal demokrat partinin bu etkiler kapsamında nasıl pozisyon aldığı da değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, O. A. (2023). How Social Democrats Have Reacted to Migrants: Turkish and German Samples. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 20–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/908707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abadan-Unat, N. (2002). Bitmeyen Göç: Konuk İşçilikten Ulus-Ötesi Yurttaşlığa. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  2. Anil, M. (2006). The New German Citizenship Law and Its Impact on German Demographics: Research Notes. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(5/6), 443-463.
  3. Bierbach, M. (2017, October 24). DW. DW: https://www.dw.com/en/afd-cdu-spd-where-do-german-parties-stand-on-refugees-asylum-and-immigration/a-40610988
  4. Chase, J. (2018, July 1). DW. DW: https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-migrant-crisis-spd-presents-5-point-plan-ahead-of-big-decision/a-44477760 CHP. (2012, August 10). CNN Türk. October 12, 2022 tarihinde CNN Türk: https://www.cnnturk.com/guncel/chp-suriye-raporunu-tamamladi
  5. CHP. (2016). Türkiye’deki Suriyeli Göçmenlerin Toplumsal Kabul ve Uyumlarına İlişkin Rapor. Ankara:
  6. CHP. Constitution, G. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html Daily Sabah. (2016, March 11). DS. DS: https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2016/03/11/chp-chairman-suggests-turkey-gives-6b-to-eu-to-take-all-refugees Financial Times. (2021, November 26). https://www.ft.com/content/8bfd5c9e-eedf-4655-8fc7-011e3cc31291
  7. Giovanis, E., Akdede, S. H., & Ozdamar, O. (2021). Impact of the EU Blue Card Programme On Cultural Participation And Subjective Well-Being Of Migrants In Germany. Plos one, 16(7), e0253952. Green, S. (2003). The Legal Status of Turks in Germany. Immigrant and Minorities, 22(2-3), 228-246. Haber Sol. (2022, October 20). https://haber.sol.org.tr/haber/kilicdaroglu-en-gec-2-yil-icerisinde-suriyeli-kardeslerimizi-gonderecegiz-352307
  8. Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science And The Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936-957.
  9. Hinze, A. M. (2008). Turkish Berlin: Integration Policy and Urban Space. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. Hürriyet Daily News. (2021, July 22). https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/chp-will-negotiate-hard-with-eu-on-refugee-burden-sharing-kilicdaroglu-166508
  10. Kay, A. (2005). A Critique Of The Use Of Path Dependency İn Policy Studies. Public administration, 83(3), 553-571.
  11. Noyan, O. (2021, September 21). Euractiv. Euractiv: https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/german-parties-and-migration-different-priorities-and-concerns/
  12. Ongur, H. Ö., & Zengin, H. (2019). Reading Agamben backwards: Syrian refugees, biopolitics and sovereignty in Turkey. Social Science Information, 58(1), 103-120.
  13. Özçelebi, S. (2002, May). Almanya’da Türkiye’nin Seçimi. Hürriyet. Panayi, P. (1994). Raci