SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Impact of the Environment-Friendly Activities of Brands on Brand Preference

Markaların Çevre Dostu Uygulamalarının Tüketicinin Marka Tercihi Üzerindeki Etkisi

İlke KARDEŞ
Pages
165–177
Publication Date
2011-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In line with analysis findings, a conceptual model to preference of eco-friendly brands has been developed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As an useful approach, company as a society organizations rather than to benefit only themselves has recently come into prominence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Environmentally friendly practices of companies are increasing within many activities in the context of social responsibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In line with analysis findings, a conceptual model to preference of eco-friendly brands has been developed
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevre dostu uygulamalar · marka tercihi · tüketici tutumu

Abstract

As an useful approach, company as a society organizations rather than to benefit only themselves has recently come into prominence. Environmentally friendly practices of companies are increasing within many activities in the context of social responsibility. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of the environmental activities of companies in the framework of physical (packaging, raw materials of the product, etc.) as well as marketing campaigns (eg, the press announcement of the environmental protection) on the Turkish consumers’ perceptions and brand preferences. Using survey techniques, a field study was conducted on consumers, and data will be analyzed statistically and interpreted. In line with analysis findings, a conceptual model to preference of eco-friendly brands has been developed

Özet

Şirketlerin sadece kendilerine fayda sağlayan bir kurum olmaktan ziyade topluma faydalı kuruluşlar olmaları gerektiği yaklaşımı son dönemde öne çıkmaktadır. Sosyal sorumluluk kapsamında değerlendirilebilecek bir çok faaliyet içerisinde firmaların çevre dostu uygulamaları artmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı; markaların hem fiziksel (ambalaj, ürünün üretiminde kullanılan hammadde, vb.) olarak hem de pazarlama kampanyaları (örneğin, çevre korunmasına katkının basın yoluyla duyurulması) çerçevesinde, sergiledikleri çevreci yaklaşımın Türk tüketicisindeki algısını ve tüketicinin marka tercihi üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Anket tekniği kullanılarak tüketiciler üzerinde bir saha çalışması yürütülmüştür ve veriler istatistiki olarak analiz edilip yorumlanmıştır. Analiz bulguları doğrultusunda çevre dostu marka tercihine dair bir model geliştirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARDEŞ, İ. (2011). Impact of the Environment-Friendly Activities of Brands on Brand Preference. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 165–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/904871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aaker, D.A. and Jacobson, R. (2001) “The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets”, Journal of Marketing Research, 38: 485–493.
  2. Ailawadi, K.L., Neslin, S.A. and Gedenk, K. (2001) “Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions”, Journal of Marketing, 65(1): 71-89.
  3. Alnıaçık, Ü., Yılmaz, C. ve Alnıaçık, E. (2010) “Reklamlarda Çevreci İddialar Ve Reklam Etkililiği: Basılı Reklamlar Üze- rinde Deneysel Bir Araştırma”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bi- limler Dergisi, 10(1): 85-106.
  4. AMA (2010) “Green Marketing”, American Marketing Associ- ation Online Dictionary, http://www.marketingpower.com/_ layouts/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=G, (09.04.2010).
  5. Aracıoğlu, B. ve Tatlıdil, R. (2009) “Tüketicilerin Satın Alma Davranışında Çevre Bilincinin Etkileri”, Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 9(2): 435-461.
  6. Ay, C. ve Ecevit, Z. (2005) “Çevre Bilinçli Tüketiciler”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 10: 238-263.
  7. Banerjee, S., Charles, S.G. and Easwar, I. (1995) “Shades of Green: Multidimensional Analysis of Environmental Adver- tising”, Journal of Advertising, 24(2): 21-32.
  8. Chang, P.-L. and Chieng, M.-H. (2006) “Building Consumer- Brand Relationship: A Cross-Cultural Experiential View”, Psychology & Marketing, 23(11): 927-959.
  9. Chen, Y.-S. (2010) “The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust”, Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2): 307-319.
  10. Covin, J.G. and Miles, M.P. (2000) “Environmental Marketing: A Source Of Reputational, Competitive And Financial Ad- vantage”, Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3): 299-312.
  11. Davis, J.J. (1993) “Strategies For Environmental Advertising”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(2): 19-36.
  12. Keller, K.L. (1998) “Strategic Brand Management”, Prentice Hall. Kim, J., Yoon, H.J. and Lee, S.Y. (2010) “Integrating Adverti- sing and Publicity: A Theoretical Examination of the Effects of Exposure Sequence, Publicity Valence, and Product Attri- bute Consistency”, Journal of Advertising, 39(1): 97-113.
  13. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J. and Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001) “Tar- geting Consumers Who Are Willing To Pay More For Envi- ronmentally Friendly Products”, Journal of Consumer Marke- ting, 18(6): 503-520.
  14. Lin, C.-F. (2002) “Segmenting Customer Brand Preferences: Demographic Or Psychographic”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(4): 249-268.
  15. Marketing Management (2009) “Consumers doubt green ef- forts”, July/August. Menon, A., Menon, A., Chowdhury, J. and Jankovich, J. (1999) “Evolving Pa