Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

National Innovation Systems and University Economics Approach for Measuring

Rekabet Gücünün Ölçülmesinde Ulusal Yenilik Sistemleri ve Üniversite Ekonomisi Yaklaşımı

Pages
407–424
Publication Date
2011-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result of the empirical analyses is consistent with the hypothesis that ‘the countries, that have relatively more powerful higher education sector, are more efficient in innovation process and also they have more competitive power than their competitors

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Innovativeness performance of national economies is the most important factor which determines the competitive power of national economies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The efficiency of National Innovation Systems (NIS), which organizes the result of numerous interactions by a community of actors and institutions in the innovation process, is one of the most important concepts that determines the competitive power of nations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result of the empirical analyses is consistent with the hypothesis that ‘the countries, that have relatively more powerful higher education sector, are more efficient in innovation process and also they have more competitive power than their competitors
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ulusal yenilik sistemleri · üniversite ekonomisi · rekabetçilik

Abstract

Innovativeness performance of national economies is the most important factor which determines the competitive power of national economies. The efficiency of National Innovation Systems (NIS), which organizes the result of numerous interactions by a community of actors and institutions in the innovation process, is one of the most important concepts that determines the competitive power of nations. In this study, the efficiency of the NIS of selected OECD countries are compared by means of knowledge production function and data envelopment analyses. The result of the empirical analyses is consistent with the hypothesis that ‘the countries, that have relatively more powerful higher education sector, are more efficient in innovation process and also they have more competitive power than their competitors

Özet

Bilgi tabanlı ekonomilerde rekabet gücünü belirleyen en önemli unsur bu ekonomilerin yenilikçi performanslarıdır. Yenilik süreçlerindeki aktörlerin etkileşimini ve bu aktörler arasındaki ilişkileri düzenleyen Ulusal Yenilik Sistemlerinin (UYS) etkinliği ülkelerin rekabet güçlerini belirleyen en önemli unsurlardan biridir. Çalışmada seçilen OECD ülkelerinin ulusal yenilik sistemlerinin etkinliği bilgi üretim fonksiyonu çerçevesinde veri zarflama analizi yöntemiyle karşılaştırılarak, söz konusu ülkelerin bilgi üretme kabiliyeti bağlamında rekabet güçlerinin karşılaştırmalı analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın ampirik sonuçları ‘Yüksek eğitim sektörlerindeki Ar-Ge harcamaları görece daha fazla olan ülkelerin, diğerlerine göre yenilik süreçlerindeki etkinliklerinin ve rekabet güçlerinin daha fazla olacağı’ hipotezi ile tutarlılık göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

SEKİ, İ., BARBAROS, R. F. (2011). National Innovation Systems and University Economics Approach for Measuring. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 407–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/904856

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. ve Feldman, M. P. (1994a) “R&D Spillovers and Innovative Activity” Ma- nagerial and Decision Economics, 15: 131-138.
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. ve Feldman, M. P. (1994b) “R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (2): 336-340.
  3. Antonelli, C. (2006) “The Economics of University: A Knowledge Governance Approach” Department of Economics ‘S. Cognetti de Martis’ Working Paper Seri- es, No: 2006/02, 1 – 20. Archibugi, D., Howells, J. ve Michie, J. (1999) Inno- vation Systems and Policy in a Global Economy, Cambrid- ge: Cambridge University Press, 1-16.
  4. Candemir, M. ve Deliktaş, E. (2006) “TİGEM İşlet- melerinde Teknik Etkinlik, Ölçek Etkinliği, Teknik İler- leme, Etkinlikteki Değişme ve Verimlilik Analizi: 1999 – 2003” Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, No. 141. Coelli, T.J., Prasada, R. D. S. ve Battese, G. E. (1998) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  5. Boston. Coelli, T.J., Prasada, R. D. S, O’Donnell, C. J. ve Battese, G. E. (2005) An introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Second Edition,
  6. Springer Yayınları,
  7. New York, ABD. David, P. ve Foray, D. (2002) “Economic Funda- mentals of Knowledge Society” Policy Futures in Educa- tion, 1 – 19. Deliktaş, E. (2002) “Türkiye Özel Sektör İmalat Sa- nayinde Etkinlik ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği Analizi” ODTU Gelişme Dergisi, 29: 247 – 284. Edquist, C., Johnson, B. ve Lundvall, B. A. (2003) “Economic Development and the National System of Innovation Approach” First Globelics Confefence, Rio de Janeiro, 2 – 15. Etzkowitz, H. (2002) “The Triple Helix of University – Industry – Government: Implications for Policy and Evaluation” Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research Working Paper Series, No: 2002/11. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. ve Zhang, Z. (1994) “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries” American Economic Review, 84: 66-83.
  8. Fargerberg, J., Knell, M ve Srholec, M. (2004) “The Competitiveness of Nations: Economic Growth in the Ece Region” UNECE Spring Seminar, Geneva, 2 – 10. Godin, B. (2007) “National Innovation System: The System Approach in Historical Perspective” Project on the History and Sociology of STI Statistics, 36. Hollanders, H. ve Celikel E. F. (2007) “Measu- ring Innovation Efficiency” Inno-Metrics Thematic Paper,www.proinnoeurope.eu/admin/uploaded_documents/ eis_2007_Innovation_efficiency.pd