Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Relation Between National Innovation Indicators and National Logistics Performance: A Research on EU Countries

Ulusal İnovasyon Göstergeleri İle Ulusal Lojistik Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
193–208
Publication Date
2012-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, positive and statistically significant effect of human resources and intellectual assets on logistics performance is presented as innovation policy proposal

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Innovation is an emerging subject nearly for 50 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nations use innovation strategies as a tool for sustainable competitive power just like firms do.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, positive and statistically significant effect of human resources and intellectual assets on logistics performance is presented as innovation policy proposal
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lojistik performans · inovasyon · hizmet inovasyonu

Abstract

Innovation is an emerging subject nearly for 50 years. Nations use innovation strategies as a tool for sustainable competitive power just like firms do. But innovation strategies yield different advantages for business sectors. The aim of this study is determine the relation between national logistics performance and national innovation indicators and analyze the effect of national innovation indicators on logistics performance of countries. Given the importance of logistics sector for countries, this study will provide a significant contribution to literature by studying increasing measures for logistics performance from the innovation perspective. In addition, this issue, which is not examined in the literature before, also increases the importance of this study. After the analysis performed, it is found that there is a positive correlation between logistics performance and innovation metrics datasets. Finally, positive and statistically significant effect of human resources and intellectual assets on logistics performance is presented as innovation policy proposal

Özet

İnovasyon yaklaşık 50 yıldır popüler olan bir konudur. Firmalar gibi ülkeler de inovasyon stratejilerini sürdürülebilir rekabet gücü için bir araç olarak kullanmaktadırlar. Ancak inovasyon stratejileri her sektör için farklı kazanımları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ulusal inovasyon göstergeleri ile ulusal lojistik performans arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi ve inovasyon göstergelerinin ülkelerin lojistik performansı üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesidir. Lojistik sektörünün ülkeler için önemi düşünüldüğünde inovasyon penceresinden lojistik performansını artırıcı yönde araştırmayı temel alan bu çalışma literatüre önemli bir katkı sağlayacaktır. Ayrıca literatürde bu konunun incelenmemiş olması da çalışmanın önemini artırmaktadır. Yapılan analizler neticesinde lojistik performansı ile inovasyon göstergeleri arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuçta, insan kaynakları ve entelektüel varlıklar değişkenlerinin lojistik performans üzerindeki pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı etkisi, inovasyon politikası önerisi olarak sunulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

BURMAOĞLU, S. (2012). Relation Between National Innovation Indicators and National Logistics Performance: A Research on EU Countries. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 193–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/904846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aas, T.H., Pedersen, P.E. (2010) “The Impact of Service Innovation on Firm-Level Financial Performance” The Service Industries Journal, 31(1):1-20.
  2. Albayrak, A.S. (2009) “Kanonik Korelasyon Analizi” Şeref KALAYCI (eds.) SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, 4’üncü Baskı,
  3. Ankara,
  4. Asil Yayın Dağıtım. Andersson, D., Norrman, A. (2002) “Procurement of Logistics Services – A Minute’s Work or A Multi- Year Project?” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1):3-14.
  5. Arvanitis, S. (2008) “Explaining Innovative Activity in Service Industries: Micro Data Evidence for Switzerland” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(3): 209-225.
  6. Arroniz, I, Sawhney M. and Wolcott R.C. (2005) “The 12 Different Ways of Company to Innovate” MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3): 75-81.
  7. Autry, C.W., Griffis, S.E. (2008) “Supply Chain Capital: The Impact of Structural and Relational Linkages on Firm Execution and Innovation” Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1): 157-174.
  8. Bakouros, Y., Samara, E. (2010) “Innovation Management Techniques: A Strategic Tool for SMEs in An Innovative Region” International Journal of Innovation Science, 2(2): 81-90.
  9. Barras, R. (1986) “Towards a Theory of Innovation in Services” Research Policy, 15(4): 161-173.
  10. Bolton, R., Grewal, D. and Levy, M. (2007) “Six Strategies for Competing Through Service: An Agenda for Future Research” Journal of Retailing, 83(1): 1-4.
  11. Busse, C., Wallenburg, C.M. (2011) “Innovation Management of Logistics Service Providers Foundations, Review, and Research Agenda” International Journal of Physical Distribution&Logistics Management, 41(2):187-218.
  12. Camacho, J.A., Rodriguez, M. (2008) “Patterns of Innovation in The Service Sector: Some Insights From The Spanish Innovation Survey” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(5): 459-471.
  13. Castro, L.M., Sanchez, A.M. and Criado, M.O.D.U. (2011) “Innovation in Service Industries: Current and Future Trends” The Service Industries Journal, 31(1):7-20.
  14. Chamberlin, T., Douitriaux, J. and Hector, J. (2010) “Business Success Factors and Innovation in Canadian Service Sectors: An Initial Investigation of Inter-Sectoral Differences” The Service Industries Journal, 30(2):225-246.
  15. Chapman, R.L., Soosay, C. ve Kandampully, J. (2003) “Innovation in Logistic Services and The New Business Model-A Conceptual Framework” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(7):630-650.
  16. Connecting to Compete (2010) “Connecting to Compete 2010 Trade Lo