SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Price and Trade Volume Relationship in Turkish Stock Market: A Time-Varying Asymmetric Causality Analysis

Türk Sermaye Piyasasında Fiyat ve İşlem Hacmi İlişkisi: Zamanla Değişen Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi

Veli YILANCI
Şeref BOZOKLU
Pages
211–220
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results reveal that there is only a unidirectional causality from the components of trade volume to the components of stock prices and this relationship changes over time

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the relationship between stock prices and trade volume for the 1990-2012 period by using daily data in Turkish stock market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Contrary to the previous studies in the literature, considering that reactions to the positive and negative shocks may be different from each other, and also the test results may change over time, we employ a time varying asymmetric causality test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results reveal that there is only a unidirectional causality from the components of trade volume to the components of stock prices and this relationship changes over time
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türk sermaye piyasası · zamanla değişen asimetrik nedensellik testi · fiyat-hacim ilişkisi

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between stock prices and trade volume for the 1990-2012 period by using daily data in Turkish stock market. Contrary to the previous studies in the literature, considering that reactions to the positive and negative shocks may be different from each other, and also the test results may change over time, we employ a time varying asymmetric causality test. The results reveal that there is only a unidirectional causality from the components of trade volume to the components of stock prices and this relationship changes over time

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türk sermaye piyasasında hisse senedi fiyatları ile işlem hacmi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini günlük veriler aracılığıyla 1990-2012 dönemi için araştırmaktadır. Literatürdeki önceki çalışmalardan farklı olarak, pozitif ve negatif şoklara verilen tepkilerin farklı olabileceği ve aynı zamanda elde edilen sonuçların zamana bağlı olarak değişebileceği dikkate alınarak, zamanla değişen asimetrik nedensellik testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, işlem hacminin bileşenlerinden hisse senedi fiyatlarının bileşenlerine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu ve bu ilişkinin zamana bağlı olarak değiştiğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

YILANCI, V., BOZOKLU, Ş. (2014). Price and Trade Volume Relationship in Turkish Stock Market: A Time-Varying Asymmetric Causality Analysis. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 211–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/904787

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Al-Deehani, T.M. (2007) “Modeling Asymmetry in the Price-Volume Relation: Evidence from Nine Stock Markets” Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4(4):8-15.
  2. Andersen, T. (1996) “Return Volatility and Trading Volume:An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility” Journal of Finance, 51(1):169-204.
  3. Arslantürk, Y., Balcılar, M. ve Özdemir, Z.A. (2011) “Time-Varying Linkages between Tourism Receipts and Economic Growth in a Small Open Economy” Economic Modelling, 28(1-2):664-671.
  4. Assogbavi, T. ve Osagie, J. (2006) “Equity Valuation Process and Price-Volume Relationship on Emerging Stock Markets” International Business and Economics Research Journal, 5:7-18.
  5. Başçı, E., Özyıldırım, S. ve Aydoğan, K. (1996) “A Note on Price-Volume Dynamics in an Emerging Stock Market” Journal of Banking and Finance, 20:389-400.
  6. Bayrakdaroğlu, A. ve Nazlıoğlu, Ş. (2009) “Hisse Senedi Fiyat-Hacim İlişkisi: İMKB’de İşlem Gören Bankalar için Doğrusal ve Doğrusal Olmayan Granger Nedensellik Analizi” İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 24(277):85-109.
  7. Blume, L., Easley, D., ve O’Hara, M. (1994) “Market Statistics and Technical Analysis: The Role of Volume” Journal of Finance, 49:153-181.
  8. Brooks, C. ve Hinich, M. J. (1998) “Episodic Nonstationarity in Exchange Rates” Applied Economics Letters, 5(11):719-722.
  9. Campbell, J., Grossman, S. ve Wang, J. (1993) “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108:905-939.
  10. Chen, G., Firth, M., ve Rui, O.M. (2001) “The Dynamic Relation between Stock Returns, Trading Volume, and Volatility” Financial Review, 38:153-174.
  11. Chuang, C.C., Kuan, C.M. ve Lin, H.Y. (2009) “Causality in Quantiles and Dynamic Stock Return- Volume Relations” Journal of Banking and Finance, 33:1351-60.
  12. Clark, P. (1973) “A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices” Econometrica, 41:135-155.
  13. Copeland, L. (1991) “Cointegration Tests with Daily Data” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53(2):185-198.
  14. Copeland, T.E. (1976) “A Model of Asset Trading Under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival” Journal of Finance, 31:1149-1168.
  15. Çukur, S., Gümrah, Ü. ve Gümrah, M.Ü. (2012) “İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında Hisse Senedi Getirileri ve İşlem Hacmi İlişkisi” Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 5(1):20-35
  16. Darwish, M. (2012) “Testing the Contemporaneous and Causal Relationship between Trading Volume and Return in the Palestine Exchange” International Journalof Econom