SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2009 / Cilt: 2009 Sayı: 2

THE COMPARISON OF ALVEOL BONE LEVEL VALUES MEASURED ON CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL BITE-WING RADIOGRAPHS

KONVANSİYONEL VE DİGİTAL BİTE-WİNG RADYOGRAMLAR ÜZERİNDE ÖLÇÜLEN ALVEOL KEMİK YÜKSEKLİK DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yrd. Doç Dr. Saadettin Dağistan
Arş Gör. Dt. M Akif Sümbüllü
Prof. Dr. Abubekir Harorlı
Pages
68–71
Publication Date
2009-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

Konvansiyonel bite-wing intra-oral radyogramlar periodontal hastalıklarla ilgili alveol kemik kaybını tespit etmek için yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Son birkaç duyulmayan dijital görüntüler üretebilen sistemler klinik uygulamalarda kullanılmaktadır. İki yöntemin karşılaştırıldığı bu çalışmada toplam 103 bireyden alınan radyogramlarda 1. ve 2. premolar ile 1. molar dişlerin mesial ve distal bölgelerini kapsayan 634 bölgeden ölçümler yapıldı. Yapılan analizler sonucu 1. premolar dişin distalinde (t= 3,90 ve p

🔖

Cite This Article

Dağistan, Y. D. D. S., Sümbüllü, A. G. D. M. A., Harorlı, P. D. A. (2009). THE COMPARISON OF ALVEOL BONE LEVEL VALUES MEASURED ON CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL BITE-WING RADIOGRAPHS. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2009 Sayı: 2, 68–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/901348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in periodonrics. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:16-28
  2. Pecoraro ML,azadivatan-le N, Janal M, Khocht A. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional Radiology 2005;34:279-284 Dentomaxillofacial
  3. Harorlı B, Akgül HM, Dağistan S. Dişhekimliği Radyolojisi. Erzurum 2006: 240-241
  4. Khocht A, Janal M, Harasty L, Cang KM. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1468-1475
  5. Miles DA, Langlais LP, Parks ET. Digital X-ray are here: why aren’t you using them? J Calif Dent assoc 1999;27(12):926-934
  6. Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital imaging in dentistry. Dent Ciln North Am 2000; 44(2):427-438
  7. Sanderink GC, Miles DA. Intraoral detectors: CCD, CMOS, TFT and other devices. Dent Ciln North Am 2000; 44(2):249-255
  8. Hausmann E, Allen K, Dunford R, Christersson L. A reliable computerized method to determine the level of the radiographic alveolar crest. Journal of Periodontal Research 1989;24:368-369
  9. Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK, Yokoyama-Crothers N, et al. Reliability of linear alveolar bone loss measurements of mandibular posterior teeth from digitized bitewing radiographs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25(11):850-856
  10. Eikenberg S, Dolley G. Detection of interproximal caries using methods applicaple to a field environment: processed film, and self-developing film. Mil Med radiography, manually phosphor oral radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2000;29: 362-367 and conventional
  11. Pecoraro ML,azadivatan-le N, Janal M, Khocht A. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional Radiology 2005;34:279-284 Dentomaxillofacial