SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS

Adnan KILINÇ
Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU
Tuba AYDIN
Mehmet Zahit BAŞ
Ümit ERTAŞ
Ertunç DAYI
Pages
216–221
Publication Date
2018-04-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The study findings show that both imme- diate implant placement and non-immediate implant pla- cement in periodontally compromised patients receiving treatment of implant-supported fixed full or partial prostheses are safe and preferable treatment modalities. * Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum ** Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum ***Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rates of implants placed in alveolar sockets immediately after the extraction of teeth or with a standard approach in normal alveolar bone in periodontally compromised patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Twelve patients (four female and eight male) ranging in age from 27 to 62 years (mean 48.6 years) were studied; the mean duration of follow-up was 27 months (range 18–36 months)..
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The study findings show that both imme- diate implant placement and non-immediate implant pla- cement in periodontally compromised patients receiving treatment of implant-supported fixed full or partial prostheses are safe and preferable treatment modalities. * Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum ** Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum ***Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Immediate dental implant · implant survival · periodontitis

Özet

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rates of implants placed in alveolar sockets immediately after the extraction of teeth or with a standard approach in normal alveolar bone in periodontally compromised patients. Material and Methods: In this study, patients who had implant placement both into healed bone after previous extraction and into the alveolar sockets in the same surgical session after extraction of periodontally hopeless teeth that had inadequate attachment and bone loss who could not be treated were selected for inclusion. Implant success, complications, and failures were recorded during follow-up. Results: Twelve patients (four female and eight male) ranging in age from 27 to 62 years (mean 48.6 years) were studied; the mean duration of follow-up was 27 months (range 18–36 months).. A total of 152 implants were placed (89 in the maxilla, 63 in the mandible). Of these, 83 (54.6%) were placed immediately into alveolar sockets following extraction and 69 (45.4%) into normal alveolar bone. The success rate for all immediately placed implants was 97.6%, and the success rate for all implants placed as non-immediate was 98.6 %. Conclusion: The study findings show that both imme- diate implant placement and non-immediate implant pla- cement in periodontally compromised patients receiving treatment of implant-supported fixed full or partial prostheses are safe and preferable treatment modalities. * Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum ** Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum ***Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum

🔖

Cite This Article

KILINÇ, A., GÜNDOĞDU, M., AYDIN, T., BAŞ, M. Z., ERTAŞ, Ü., DAYI, E. (2018). AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 216–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/901097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A: Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16:1-132
  2. Chrcanovic BR, Martins MD, Wennerberg A: Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 Suppl 1:e1-e16
  3. Casap N, Zeltser C, Wexler A, Tarazi E, Zeltser R: Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65:384-92
  4. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, Piattelli A: Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1560-71
  5. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A: Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:189-99
  6. Lee CT, Chiu TS, Chuang SK, Tarnow D, Stoupel J: Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41:914-26
  7. Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth--implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:643-53
  8. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:667-76
  9. Altintas NY, Taskesen F, Bagis B, Baltacioglu E, Cezairli B, Senel FC: Immediate implant placement in fresh sockets versus implant placement in healed bone for full-arch fixed prostheses with conventional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45:226-31
  10. Schwartz-Arad D, Laviv A, Levin L: Survival of immediately provisionalized dental implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2007; 78:219-23
  11. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP: Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:329-39