Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING PROCEDURES USING XENOGENEIC CORTICOCANCELLOUS GRAFT MATERIAL WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT: A 1- TO 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

KSENOJEN KORTİKOKANSELLÖZ GREFT MATERYALİ KULLANILAN MAKSİLLER SİNÜS TABANI YÜKSELTİLMESİ PROSEDÜRÜYLE EŞ ZAMANLI İMPLANT YERLEŞTİRİLMESİ: 1 – 3 YILLIK TAKİP

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Only two implants were lost before loading and overall survival rate was 96% for the implant-based analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcomes of laterally approached sinus floor lifting with xenografts and simultaneously dental implant placement procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: All patients treated with sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement procedure and were followed for at least 1 year were retrospectively selected for this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Only two implants were lost before loading and overall survival rate was 96% for the implant-based analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcomes of laterally approached sinus floor lifting with xenografts and simultaneously dental implant placement procedures. Material and Methods: All patients treated with sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement procedure and were followed for at least 1 year were retrospectively selected for this study. The lateral window technique was performed using a xenogeneic cortico-cancellous grafting material and bone-level implants were placed immediately. Survival rates of implants and clinical features of patients and implants were evaluated. Results: A sample of 30 patients, 42 implants were placed according to the one-stage approach. Residual preoperatively alveolar ridge height varied between 3 and 6 mm with a mean of 4.58 mm and the bone gain at 1-year follow-up varied between 6 mm and 10 mm with a mean of 8.6 mm. Only two implants were lost before loading and overall survival rate was 96% for the implant-based analysis. Conclusions: Maxillary sinus lifting procedure with xenogeneic cortico-cancellous graft material and simultaneously implant placement was showed as a predictable and successful treatment modality

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın hedefi ksenogreft kullanılan lateral yaklaşım ile maksiller sinüs tabanı yükseltilmesi ve eş zamanlı implant yerleşimi işleminin klinik sonuçlarının retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Tüm hastalara sinus tabanı yükseltme işlemi ile eş zamanlı implant yerleşimi uygulanmış ve en az 1 yıl süreyle takip edilmiştir. Hayvan kaynaklı kortikokansellöz greft materyali ve lateral pencere tekniği uygulanmış ve aynı esnada kemik İmplantların sağkalım oranları ve hastaların klinik özellikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: 30 hasta üzerinde tek aşamalı yaklaşım ile 42 implant yerleştirilmiştir. Preoperatif rezidüel alveolar kemik yüksekliği 3 mm ile 6 mm arasında değişmektedir ve ortalama 4,58 mm'dir ve 1 yıllık takiplerde kemik kazanımı 6 mm ile 10 mm arasında değişmektedir ve ortalama 8,6 mm'dir. Sadece 2 implant yükleme öncesinde kaybedilmiştir ve implant sağ kalım oranı %96 olarak görülmüştür. Sonuç: Ksenojen kortikokansellöz kemik grefti kullanılan maksiller sinus tabanı yükseltme işlemi ile eş zamanlı implant yerleşimi öngörülebilir ve başarılı bir tedavi yöntemi olarak görülmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAOL, M., DAYI, E., KILINÇ, A. (2022). MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING PROCEDURES USING XENOGENEIC CORTICOCANCELLOUS GRAFT MATERIAL WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT: A 1- TO 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/451934

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Chang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, Lin YS, Huang SR. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys 2012; Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. KILINÇ, ATAOL, J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni DAYI Cilt:28, Sayı:1, Yıl: 2018, Sayfa, 1-6 5 doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.005
  2. Marx RE. Alveolar Bone Augmentation via In Situ Tissue Engineering. in Tolstunov L, Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Implant Dentistry: A Surgical Manual Wiley: 2015 p:297-310 3. Esposito M, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Sammartino G, Grandi G, Felice P. Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2015;8:257-68
  3. Jurisic M, Markovic A, Radulovic M, Brkovic BMB, Sandor GKB. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:820-7. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025
  4. Umanjec‐Korac S, Wu G, Hassan B, Liu Y, Wismeijer D. A retrospective analysis of the resorption rate of deproteinized bovine bone as maxillary sinus graft material on cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:781-5
  5. Jensen OT, Brownd C, Baer D. Maxillary molar sinus floor intrusion at the time of dental extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1415-9
  6. Fugazzotto PA. Sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction: technique and report of preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1999;14:536-42
  7. Doobrow JH, Leite RS, Hirsch HZ. Concomitant oroantral communication repair and immediate implant placement: a five-year case report. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 176-81. doi:10. 1097/ID. 0b013e318166dbe7
  8. Tatum Jr H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207- 29
  9. Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernandez-Barbero JE, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:376-82. doi:10.1111/j.1600- 0501.2007.01337.x
  10. Lambert F, Lecloux G, Rompen E. One-step approach for implant placement and subantral bone regeneration using bovine hydroxyapatite: a 2- to 6- year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:598-606
  11. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor