Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems / 2021 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Tongue-Operated Biosignal over EEG and Processing with Decision Tree and kNN

Pages
112–125
Publication Date
2021-01-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is well-known that EEG deficits are major concerns for brain-computer interfaces.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tongue-machine interface (TMI) is a feasible way between the assistive technologies and paralyzed individuals who have lost their abilities to communicate with the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, ten naive healthy subjects have attended who were between 22-34 ages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is well-known that EEG deficits are major concerns for brain-computer interfaces.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glossokinetic Potential · Tongue-Machine Interface · Brain-Computer Interface

Abstract

Tongue-machine interface (TMI) is a feasible way between the assistive technologies and paralyzed individuals who have lost their abilities to communicate with the environment. Researchers have presented equipment based tongue-machine interfaces to reach a reliable and speedy system. However, this kind of interfaces may occur a way of obtrusive, unattractive and unhygienic for disabled persons. In this research, we intended to propose a natural, unobtrusive and robust glossokinetic potential signals (GKP) based TMI exploring the success of the novel machine learning algorithms. The tongue is bound up with cranial nerves to the brain, which can escape from the spinal cord injuries in general. Moreover, the tongue has highly capable of sophisticated manipulation tasks with less perceived exertion in the oral cavity and gives degrees of privacy. In this study, ten naive healthy subjects have attended who were between 22-34 ages. Decision Tree (DT) and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) algorithms were used with Mean-Absolute Value (MAV) and Power Spectral Density (PSD) methods. Moreover, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) was implemented to reveal the theta and delta subbands. In the study, the highest value was provided as 96.77% by the k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm for the best participant. Furthermore, the GKP-based TMI may be an alternative system for the limitations of the brain-computer interfaces. It is well-known that EEG deficits are major concerns for brain-computer interfaces.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRÜR, K., BOZKURT, M. R., BASCIL, M. S., TEMURTAS, F. (2021). Tongue-Operated Biosignal over EEG and Processing with Decision Tree and kNN. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 112–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/899451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. X. Huo, M. Ghovanloo, “Tongue Drive: A wireless tongue-operated means for people with severe disabilities to communicate their intentions”, IEEE Comm. Magaz., vol.50, no.10, pp.128-135, 2012
  2. L.N.S. Andreasen Struijk, “An inductive tongue computer interface for control of computers and assistive devices,” IEEE Trans on Biomed Engin., vol. 53, no.12, pp. 2594-2597, 2006
  3. Y. Nam, Q. Zhao, A. Cichocki, S. Choi, “Tongue-Rudder: A Glossokinetic-Potential-Based tongue–machine interface,” IEEE Trans. on Bio Engin., vol.59, no.1, pp.290-299, 2012
  4. Y. Nam, B. Koo, A. Cichocki, S. Choi, “GOM-Face: GKP, EOG, and EMG-Based multimodal interface with application to humanoid robot control,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Engin. vol.61, no.2, pp.453-462, 2014
  5. Y. Nam, B. Koo, A. Cichocki, S. Choi, “Glossokinetic Potentials for a tongue–machine interface,” IEEE Systems, Man, & Cybernetics Magaz., vol.2, no.1, pp.6-13, 2016
  6. H. Tang, D.J. Beebe, “An oral tactile interface for blind navigation,” IEEE Trans On Neural Sys. and Rehab. Engin., vol.14, no.1, pp.116-123, 2006
  7. X. Bao, J. Wang, J. Hu, “Method of individual identification based on electroencephalogram analysis,” Inter Conf on New Trends in Infor and Ser Sci. pp.390-393 (DOI: 10.1109/NISS.2009.44. 2009)
  8. K.J. Miller, P. Shenoy, M. Nijs, L.B. Sorensen, et.al,. ”Beyond the Gamma Band: The role of high-frequency features in movement classification,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Engin. vol.55, no.5, pp.1634-1637, 2008
  9. D. Xiao, J. Hu, “Identification of motor imagery EEG signal,” Inter Conference on Biomedical Eng and Computer Science, 2010; Wuhan, China
  10. B. Reuderink, M. Poel, A. Nijholt, “The impact of loss of control on movement BCIs,” IEEE Trans on Neural Syst. and Reha. Engin., vol.19, no.6, pp.628-637, 2011
  11. X. Huo, J. Wang, M. Ghovanloo, “A magneto-inductive sensor based wireless tongue-computer interface,” IEEE Trans on Neural Syst. and Reha. Engin., vol.16, no.5, pp.497-504, 2008
  12. R. Rupp, M. Rohm, M. Schneiders, A. Kreilinger, G.R. Müller-Putz. “Functional rehabilitation of the paralyzed upper extremity after spinal cord injury by noninvasive hybrid neuroprostheses,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.103, no.6, pp.954-968, 2015
  13. L.M. Alonso-Valerdi, F. Sepulveda, “Development of a simulated living environment platform: Design of BCI assistive software and modelling of a virtual dwelling place,” Computer Aided Design, vol,54, pp.39-50, 2014
  14. X. Huo, J. Wang, M. Ghovanloo,