Journals / Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

LITERATURE REVIEW ON DETERMINING FISH FRESHNESS BY ELECTRONIC NOSE AND MACHINE LEARNING

BALIK TAZELİĞİNİN ELEKTRONİK BURUN VE MAKİNE ÖĞRENMESİ İLE TESPİTİ ÜZERİNE LİTERATÜR ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
161–170
Publication Date
2020-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this related literature study, especially fish freshness was evaluated in terms of electronic nose and signal processing-machine learning approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fish freshness control has gained a lot of attention in recent years due to its importance in the food industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although there are different approaches in fish freshness studies, the most important one is the electronic nose approach consisting of electronic sensor arrays.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this related literature study, especially fish freshness was evaluated in terms of electronic nose and signal processing-machine learning approaches.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Balık Tazeliği · Elektronik Burun · Sinyal İşleme

Abstract

Fish freshness control has gained a lot of attention in recent years due to its importance in the food industry. Although there are different approaches in fish freshness studies, the most important one is the electronic nose approach consisting of electronic sensor arrays. Freshness, which is the most important quality feature in fish, depends on the process and storage procedures from the moment the fish first emerges to the consumers. Practically, physical, chemical, biochemical and microbiological changes that occur after death in fish result in a gradual loss of food properties in terms of taste and a general concept of quality. In this respect, elapsed time and temperature are key factors for the final quality of the product. Signal processing and machine learning approaches include very important methods in recognizing the pattern of odor measured by the electronic nose of fish freshness. In this related literature study, especially fish freshness was evaluated in terms of electronic nose and signal processing-machine learning approaches.

Özet

Balık tazelik kontrolü, gıda endüstrisindeki önemi nedeniyle son yıllarda büyük bir ilgi görmektedir. Balık tazeliği çalışmalarında farklı yaklaşımlar olsa da en önemlisi elektronik sensör dizilerinden oluşan elektronik burun yaklaşımıdır. Balıkta kalite özelliklerinden en önemlisi olan tazelik, balığın ilk sudan çıktığı andan tüketicilere kadar olan sürece ve depolama prosedürlerine bağlıdır. Pratik olarak, balıklarda ölüm sonrası meydana gelen fiziksel, kimyasal, biyokimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik değişiklikler, tat ve genel bir kalite kavramı açısından gıda özelliklerinde aşamalı bir kayıpla sonuçlanır. Bu açıdan geçen süre ve sıcaklık ürünün nihai kalitesi için anahtar faktörlerdir. Sinyal işleme ve makine öğrenmesi yaklaşımları balık tazeliğine ait elektronik burun tarafından ölçülen kokunun örüntüsünün tanınmasında oldukça önemli yöntemleri içermektedir. İlgili bu literatür çalışmasında özellikle balık tazeliği, elektronik burun ve sinyal işleme-makine öğrenmesi yaklaşımları açısından değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRÜR, K., ÇETİN, O., ÖZER, İ., TEMURTAŞ, F. (2020). LITERATURE REVIEW ON DETERMINING FISH FRESHNESS BY ELECTRONIC NOSE AND MACHINE LEARNING. Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 161–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/133643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Vorobioff J. et al.,”Development of an Electronic Nose for Determining the Freshness of Fish by the Desorption Constants of Sensors”, Sensor Letters, 11, 1-3, 2013
  2. Macagnano A. et al., “A model to predict fish quality from instrumental features”, Sensors and Actuators B, 111-112, 293-298, 2005
  3. GholamHosseini H. et al., “Intelligent Processing of E-nose Information for Fish Freshness Assessment”, 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, 173-177, 2007
  4. Weng X., et al., “A Comprehensive Method for Assessing Meat Freshness Using Fusing Electronic Nose, Computer Vision, and Artificial Tactile Technologies”, Journal of Sensors, 1-14, 2020
  5. Alimelli A. et al., “Fish freshness detection by a computer screen photoassisted based gas sensor array”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 582, 320-328, 2007
  6. Karakaya D. et al., “Electronic Nose and Its Applications: A Survey”, International Journal of Automation and Computing, 17, 179-209, 2020
  7. Zhou L. et al. “Application of Deep Learning in Food: A Review”, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 18, 1793-1811, 2019
  8. Pasuba K. et al., “A comparison between shallow and deep architecture classifiers on small dataset”, 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, 1-6, 2016
  9. Güney S. et al. “Study of fish species discrimination via electronic nose”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 119, 83-91, 2019
  10. O. Connell M. et al., “A practical approach for fish freshness determinations using a portable electronic nose”, Sensors and Actuators B, 80, 149-154, 2001
  11. Qin J. et al., “Detection of fish fillet substitution and mislabeling using multimode hyperspectral imaging techniques”, Food Control, 114, 107234, 2020
  12. Gorur K. et al., “Glossokinetic potential based tongue–machine interface for 1-D extraction”, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, 41-2, 379-391, 2018
  13. Gorur K. et al., “Glossokinetic potential based tongue–machine interface for 1-D extraction using neural networks”, Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 38-3, 745-759, 2018
  14. Gorur K. et al., “GKP signal processing using deep CNN and SVM for tongue-machine interface”, Traitement Du Signal, 36, 319-329, 2019
  15. Schmidhuber J., “Deep Learning in Neural Networks:An Overview”, Neural Networks, 61, 85-117, 2015
  16. Bernardo YAA. et al., “Fish Quality Index Method: Principles, weaknesses, valid