SavedAdd your journal

Journals / AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology / 2014 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 15

Analysis of Behavior Differences of Generation Y in Organizational Environment

Y Neslinin Örgüt Ortamındaki Davranış Farklılıklarının Analizi

Murat ÇEMBERCİ
Melike Kıvanç SUDAK
Saim AŞÇI
Mustafa Emre CİVELEK
Sabri ÖZ
Pages
57–74
Publication Date
2014-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the result of analysis, it has been scientifically proven that generation Y is different from others in these dimensions: multi-tasking, use of social media, ability to team work, working joyfully and employee commitments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effectiveness of generation Y that is known as digital generation is continuously increasing in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They have begun to take responsibilities in the managerial positions of the organizations in different scales and sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the result of analysis, it has been scientifically proven that generation Y is different from others in these dimensions: multi-tasking, use of social media, ability to team work, working joyfully and employee commitments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dijital Kuşak · Y Nesli · İş Görme Anlayışı

Abstract

Effectiveness of generation Y that is known as digital generation is continuously increasing in recent years. They have begun to take responsibilities in the managerial positions of the organizations in different scales and sectors. This situation has led to the perception that generation Y working in organizations is different from others in terms of business behaviors. In this study, primarily, it is aimed that the determinations of the dimensions that generation Y differentiate from others in organization environment and analysis the differentiation in the direction of these dimensions. According to the result of analysis, it has been scientifically proven that generation Y is different from others in these dimensions: multi-tasking, use of social media, ability to team work, working joyfully and employee commitments.

Özet

Dijital Kuşak olarak bilinen Y neslinin son yıllarda örgütlerdeki etkinliği giderek artmaktadır. Birçok sektörde faaliyet gösteren farklı ölçeklerdeki örgütlerde yönetsel pozisyonlarda görev almaya başlamışlardır. Bu durum, örgüt içindeki Y neslinin diğerlerinden iş görme anlayışı açısından farklı olduklarına dair bir algıya sebep olmuştur. Bu araştırmada, öncelikle Y neslinin örgüt ortamında diğer çalışanlardan farklılaştığı boyutların belirlenmesi ve bu boyutların hangi yönde farklılaştıklarının analizi amaçlanmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, Y neslinin çoklu görev, sosyal medya kullanımı, takım çalışmasına yatkınlık, eğlenerek çalışma ve çalışan bağlılığı boyutlarında diğerlerinden farklı oldukları bilimsel olarak ispatlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEMBERCİ, M., SUDAK, M. K., AŞÇI, S., CİVELEK, M. E., ÖZ, S. (2014). Analysis of Behavior Differences of Generation Y in Organizational Environment. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 15, 57–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/899187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ALLEN N., MEYER J. (1993),Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization’, Journal of Occupational Psychology,78,538-551.
  2. ARSENAULT, P., M.: 2004 ‘Validating Generational Differences’ The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, Vol.25/2, pp.315. BERG D. H., (2011). The power of a playful spirit at work. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 24, 57-62.
  3. ELKIND, D. (1978). Understanding the young adolescent. Adolescence, 13, 127-134.
  4. ERIKSON, E.H. (1980). Identity and the Life Cycle.NewYork:W.W. Norton&Company,Inc. FAMILIES AND WORK INSTITUTE: Generation and Gender in the Workplace, 2002, www.familiesandwork.org GARDNER S.F. (2006). ‘Preparing for the Nexters’. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 70 (4), 1. GERKE M.L. (2001). “Understanding and leading the quad matrix: four generations in the workplace: the Traditional Generation, Boomers, Gen X, Nexters”. Seminars for Nurse Managers 9 (3), 173–181.
  5. GOLDBERG (1990), L.R; An Alternative ‘Description of Personality’ The Big Five Factor Structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.59, pp. 213-227. HayGroup, (2012). Üçüncü bin yılda Y nesli işbaşında: Gençler “İş’ e El Koydu. Hay Group Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti. HILLS C., RYAN S., SMITH D.R. and WARREN H. (2012). “The Impact of Generation Y Occupational Therapy Students on Practice Education”. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. Vol. 59, pp. 156-163.
  6. HOGG, D. (2012). ‘Application of Groupthink to Generation Y Decision Making Processes within a Professional Services Context in New Zealand’. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 69-79.
  7. HOWE, N., STRAUSS, W, (1992).
  8. The New Generation Gap, The Atlantic Monthly, sf:67-89.
  9. HOWE, N.,andSTRAUSS, B. (2000). ‘Millennials rising: The next greatest generation’. New York: Vintage Books. HUTCHINSON, D. (2012). ‘Attracting and Maintaining the Y Generation in Nursing: A Literature Review’. Journal of Nursing Management, pp. 444–450.
  10. KELAN, E.L.,GRATTON, L., MAH, A. and WALKER, L., (2009). ‘The Reflexive Generation: Young Professionals’ Perspectives on Work’, Career and Gender. London Business School. KUPPERSCHMDTH, B. (2000). “Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management”. The Health Care Manager, 19, pp. 65–76.
  11. LEVID. and SLEMC.(1995).Team work in R&D organizations: The characteristics of successful teams, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 16, pp.29-42.
  12. LOWER J. (2008).