Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 16

A Literature Review on Multiple Institutional Logics in Institutional Fields

Örgütsel Alanlarda Çoklu Kurumsal Mantıklar Üzerine Bir Yazın Taraması

Pages
2558–2279
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, by making a general evaluation about multiple institutional logics, in the future, some research suggestions will be shared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In organizational and management research, approach of institutional logic is frequently used to examine the institutional change of certain institutional fields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The institutional logic approach focuses on the effects of conflicting institutional logics in the institutional fields on the organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, by making a general evaluation about multiple institutional logics, in the future, some research suggestions will be shared.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Alan · Kurumsal Mantık · Çoklu Kurumsal Mantıklar

Abstract

In organizational and management research, approach of institutional logic is frequently used to examine the institutional change of certain institutional fields. The institutional logic approach focuses on the effects of conflicting institutional logics in the institutional fields on the organization. In the institutional logic approach, rather than the processes of isomorphism and homogeneity as in institutional theory, there are heterogeneity and effects of different institutional authorities on organizations and individuals. In recent years, a new trend has emerged in research of institutional logic and there is a serious academic accumulation related to multiple institutional logics, especially in international organization and management literature. Studies with this trend show that multiple institutional logics can take place in the same institutional field. In this context, the purpose of this study is to reveal in detail the researches carried out in various institutional fields on multiple institutional logics based on the existing literature. At the end of the study, by making a general evaluation about multiple institutional logics, in the future, some research suggestions will be shared.

Özet

Örgüt ve yönetim yazınında kurumsal mantık yaklaşımı belirli örgütsel alanların kurumsal değişimini incelemede sıkça kullanılmaktadır. Kurumsal mantık yaklaşımı, genel olarak örgütsel alan içerisinde çelişen ve birbiri ile çatışan kurumsal mantıkların örgütlere etkileri üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Kurumsal mantık yaklaşımında, kurumsal kuramdaki gibi eşbiçimlilik ve homojenlik süreçlerinden ziyade farklı kurumsal aktörlerin örgütler ve bireyler üzerindeki etkileri ve heterojenlik söz konusudur. Son yıllarda ise kurumsal mantık araştırmalarında yeni bir akımın ortaya çıktığı ve bu akımla birlikte çoklu kurumsal mantıklar ile ilgili özellikle uluslararası örgüt ve yönetim yazınında ciddi bir akademik birikim oluştuğu görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda yapılan araştırmalar, aynı örgütsel alanda çoklu kurumsal mantıkların aynı anda yer alabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada, mevcut yazından yola çıkarak çoklu kurumsal mantıklar üzerine farklı örgütsel alanlarda gerçekleştirilen çalışmaları ve çoklu kurumsal mantıklar ile ilgili tartışmaları ayrıntılı bir biçimde ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmanın sonunda, çoklu kurumsal mantıklar ile ilgili genel bir değerlendirme yapılarak, gelecekte konuyla ilgili olarak çalışılabilecek bazı araştırma önerileri paylaşılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, Ü. (2018). A Literature Review on Multiple Institutional Logics in Institutional Fields. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 16, 2558–2279. https://ajindex.com/articles/897080

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alford, R. R., ve Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Andersson, T., ve Liff, R. (2018). Cooptation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5 (2), 71–87.
  3. Besharov, M. L., ve Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of management review, 39(3), 364-381.
  4. Çakar, M., ve Danışman A. (2012).
  5. Kurumsal kuram. Sözen H.C., Basım, H.N. (Der.) Örgüt Kuramları. 241-271. İstanbul:
  6. Beta Yayınevi.
  7. Dunn, M. B., ve Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114-149.
  8. Fincham, R., ve Forbes, T. (2015). Three's a crowd: The role of interlogic relationships in highly complex institutional fields. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 657-670.
  9. Friedland, R., ve Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 232-267. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Glynn, M. A., ve Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1031–1055.
  11. Goodrick, E., ve Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372-416.
  12. Green Jr, S. E., Babb, M., ve Alpaslan, C. M. (2008). Institutional field dynamics and the competition between institutional logics: The role of rhetoric in the evolving control of the modern corporation. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 40-73.
  13. Greenwood, R., ve Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management journal, 49(1), 27-48.
  14. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., ve Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 317-371.
  15. Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., ve Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521-539.
  16. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., ve Lo-uns