Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Are The Strategic Intents of Organizations in The Same Institutional Environment Isomorphic? A Qualitative Research on the Strategic Plans of Foundation Universities

Aynı Kurumsal Çevredeki Örgütlerin Stratejik Niyetleri Eş biçimli Midir? Vakıf Üniversitelerinin Stratejik Planlarının İçerik Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi

Pages
178–189
Publication Date
2020-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings of the study suggest that there are different levels of isomorphism between the strategic plans of foundation universities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In terms of conceptual background, this study is based on the new institutional theory and strategic management theories, which have been increasingly studied in the field of organization and management in general.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the basic thesis of the new institutional theory is the assumption that the organizations operate under institutional influences and that the structures and processes of organizations become uniform by their adaptation to the corporate environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings of the study suggest that there are different levels of isomorphism between the strategic plans of foundation universities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Stratejik Yönetim · Kurumsal Kuram · Eşbiçimlilik

Abstract

In terms of conceptual background, this study is based on the new institutional theory and strategic management theories, which have been increasingly studied in the field of organization and management in general. According to the new institutional theory, the institutional environment is an environment which includes the structures, rules and norms formed on and outside the organizations. In this context, the basic thesis of the new institutional theory is the assumption that the organizations operate under institutional influences and that the structures and processes of organizations become uniform by their adaptation to the corporate environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine whether there is a similarity or differentiation between the strategic intentions of the organizations in the same institutional environment. For this purpose, the basic assumptions of new institutional theory and strategic management approaches were tested by examining the strategic plans of foundation universities using content analysis method in March 2012 and in November 2018.Creating of themes on the concept of strategic intent, expressions of strategic intent were identified by the authors. Findings of the study suggest that there are different levels of isomorphism between the strategic plans of foundation universities.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı aynı kurumsal çevredeki örgütlerin stratejik niyetleri arasında benzerlik olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla, vakıf üniversitelerinin stratejik planları içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak 2012 yılı Mart ayında ve 2018 yılı Kasım ayında incelenmiş ve yeni kurumsal kuram ve stratejik yönetim yaklaşımlarının temel varsayımları test edilmiştir. Çalışmada “stratejik niyet” kavramına ilişkin temalar oluşturulmuş ve temalara ilişkin “stratejik niyet” belirten ifadeler yazarlar tarafından ilgili yazın dikkate alınarak tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular vakıf üniversitelerinin stratejik planları arasında farklı düzeylerde eşbiçimlilik olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, K., YILDIZ, Ü. (2020). Are The Strategic Intents of Organizations in The Same Institutional Environment Isomorphic? A Qualitative Research on the Strategic Plans of Foundation Universities. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 178–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/2704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. Ve Yıldırım, E. (2010). “Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri Spss Uygulamalı”, Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  2. Astley, W. Graham Ve Van De Ven, Andrew H. 1983. “Central Perspectives And Debates In Organization Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, C.28, S. 2 ss. 245-273. Ayoubi R.M.Ve Massoud H.K., (2007), “The Strategy Of İnternationalization İn Universities: A Quantitative Evaluation Of The İntent And İmplementation İn Uk Universities”, International Journal Of Educational Management, Vol.21 Iss: 4 ss. 329-349. Brewer Ve Hensher, (1998),”Strategic İntent And İncentives İn An İndustry Organisation The Case Of The Board Of Airline Representatives Australia”, Journal Of Air Transport Management 4, ss.87-97.
  3. Burgelman, R. A., (1994), “Fadingmemories: A Process Theory Of Strategic Business Exit İn Dynamic Environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, ss.24–56.
  4. Burgelman, R. A., (1996), “A Process Model Of Strategic Business Exit: Implications For An Evolutionary Perspective On Strategy,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, ss.193–214.
  5. Burgelman, R. A., Ve Grove, A. S. (1996), “Strategic Dissonance”, California Management Review, 38(2), ss.8–28.
  6. Çakar, M, Ve Danışman, A. (2012).
  7. Kurumsal Kuram. Sözen H.C., Basım, H.N. (Der.) Örgüt Kuramları. ss.241-271. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi. Darcy S. Ve Pegg S., (2011), “Towards Strategic Intent Perceptions Of Disability Service Provision Amongst Hotel Accommodation Managers”, International Journal Of Hospitality Management 30, ss. 468-476.
  8. Demirok, Ersin (2011), “Türkiye’deki Kurumların Stratejik Planlarının İncelenmesi”, 19.Ulusal Yönetim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, S.61-63, 24-26 Mayıs 2011,
  9. Çanakkale. Dımaggıo, P.J Ve Powell, W.W. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism And Collective Rationality İn Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review, C.48, S.2, ss. 147-160.
  10. Ger, Metin (2007), “Yükseköğretim Kapsamında Stratejik Planlamanın Evrimi Ve Yök Ve Üniversitelerin Strateji Belgelerinin Kritik Analizi”, Http://Www.Ydg-Online.Org/Ydg/İndex.Php, 18.01.2012.
  11. Hamel, G. Ve Prahalad, C. K. (1989), “Strategic İntent”, Harvard Business Review, May–June, ss.63–76.
  12. Hamel, G. Ve Prahalad, C. K. (1994), “Competing For The Future”, Harvard University Press.
  13. Hamilton, R.D., Iıı., E.D. Eskin, Ve M.P. Michaels, (1998), “Assessing Competitors:The Gap Between Strategic İntent And Core Capability”, Long Range Planning 31, No. 3: ss.406–417. Ha