SavedAdd your journal

Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 17

The Mediation Effect of Psychological Capital Between Authentic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: The Case of Bingöl University

Otantik Liderlik İle Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasında Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracılık Rolü: Bingöl Üniversitesi Örneği

Tuba BÜYÜKBEŞE
Sinan ÇAVUŞOĞLU
Olcay OKUN
Pages
194–225
Publication Date
2019-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the mediation effect of the optimism, psychological resilience and hope sub-dimensions of the psychological capital between the authentic leadership and the organizational commitment has not been demonstrated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of psychological capital in relation to authentic leadership and organizational commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research sample was composed of 295 academic and administrative staff working at Bingöl University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the mediation effect of the optimism, psychological resilience and hope sub-dimensions of the psychological capital between the authentic leadership and the organizational commitment has not been demonstrated.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Otantik liderlik · Örgütsel bağlılık · Psikolojik sermaye

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of psychological capital in relation to authentic leadership and organizational commitment. The research sample was composed of 295 academic and administrative staff working at Bingöl University. In this study convenience sampling method and questionnaire was used as data collection tool. The questionnaire included authentic leadership, psychological capital and organizational commitment questions to measure variables and demographic characteristics. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS and AMOS programs. The validity and reliability of the scales used in this study were tested and confirmatory factor analysis was applied. The hypotheses were examined by correlation and regression test and Sobel test was applied and the obtained findings were interpreted in this context. Findings have shown that in increasing organizational commitment, there are important roles of authentic leadership and psychological capital. It has also been found that the authentic leadership of psychological capital (self-efficiency) has a partial mediator role in the effect on organizational commitment. On the other hand, the mediation effect of the optimism, psychological resilience and hope sub-dimensions of the psychological capital between the authentic leadership and the organizational commitment has not been demonstrated.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, otantik liderlik ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik sermayenin aracılık rolünü belirlemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Bingöl Üniversitesinde görev yapan 295 akademik ve idari personel oluşturmuştur. Kolayda örneklem yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak anket kullanılmıştır. Ankette otantik liderlik, psikolojik sermaye ve örgütsel bağlılık değişkenlerini ölçmeye yönelik ifadeler ve demografik özelliklere ilişkin sorulara yer verilmiştir. Toplanan veriler SPSS ve AMOS programlarıyla analiz edilmiştir. Konuya ilişkin kullanılan ölçeklerin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği test edilmiş ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Hipotezler korelasyon ve regresyon testi ile incelenmiş olup Sobel testi yapılarak sağlaması uygulanmış, elde edilen bulgular bu kapsamda yorumlanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular örgütsel bağlılığın artmasında, otantik liderlik ve psikolojik sermayenin önemli rollerinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca psikolojik sermayenin (öz yeterliliğin) otantik liderliğin, örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisinde kısmi aracı rolü olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Diğer taraftan psikolojik sermayenin iyimserlik, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve umut alt boyutlarının otantik liderliğin ile örgütsel bağlılık arasında aracılık etkisi tespit edilmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKBEŞE, T., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, S., OKUN, O. (2019). The Mediation Effect of Psychological Capital Between Authentic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: The Case of Bingöl University. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 17, 194–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/896765

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Allen, N. J., ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal Of Occupational And Organizational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  2. Alpar, R. (2011). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Ankara:
  3. Detay Yayıncılık. Atchison, T. ve Lefferts, E. A. (1972). The prediction of turnover using Herzberg's job satisfaction technique. Personnel Psychology, 25(1), 53-64.
  4. Avcı, A. ve Bozgeyikli, H. (2017). Okul yöneticilerinin yönetici kaygı düzeylerinin yordayıcısı olarak psikolojik sermaye. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 45, 43-57.
  5. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. M. (2008). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Institute Faculty Publications, Paper 6,1-42.
  6. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., ve Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152.
  7. Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., ve Walumbwa, F. O. (2004). Authentic Leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance working paper. Gallup Leadership İnstitute, University of Ne-braska, Lincoln. Avolio, Bruce J. ve Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.16, s.315-338.
  8. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociologv, 66, 32-42.
  9. Bhindi, N. ve Duignan, P. (1997). Leadership for1the new century: Authenticity, intentionality, spirituality and sensibility. Management and Administration Journal, 25(2), 117-132.
  10. Bhindi, N., Smith, R., Hansen, J., ve Riley, D. (2008, April). Authentic leadership in education: a cross-country phenomenon–or, lead-ers in their own mind. In Enhancing the Heart, Enriching the Mind at the international leadership conference, New Zealand, Vol. 30. Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
  11. Bozgeyikli, H. (2017). Big five personality traits as the predictor of teachers’org