Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 18

Analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Identification

Örgütsel Adalet ile Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Pages
1001–1024
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the relationship between organizational justice dimensions and organizational identification, there is a positive relationship between distributive justice and organizational identification, and there is no statistically significant relationship between procedural and interactional justice dimensions and organizational identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concepts of organizational justice and organizational identification have always been found interesting by researchers in terms of determining employees’ behavior in organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to realize this aim, 192 of 260 employees in a manufacturing company operating in Izmir province were able to obtain data using questionnaire technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the relationship between organizational justice dimensions and organizational identification, there is a positive relationship between distributive justice and organizational identification, and there is no statistically significant relationship between procedural and interactional justice dimensions and organizational identification.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgüsel adalet · örgütsel özdeşleşme · dağıtım adaleti

Abstract

The concepts of organizational justice and organizational identification have always been found interesting by researchers in terms of determining employees’ behavior in organizations. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between organizational justice and organizational identification. In order to realize this aim, 192 of 260 employees in a manufacturing company operating in Izmir province were able to obtain data using questionnaire technique. These data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS statistical programs. As a result of the analyses made, it has been found that there is a positive relationship between organizational justice and organizational identification. According to the results of the relationship between organizational justice dimensions and organizational identification, there is a positive relationship between distributive justice and organizational identification, and there is no statistically significant relationship between procedural and interactional justice dimensions and organizational identification. The results were similar to the results of the study investigating the relationship between organizational justice and organizational identification. In consequence of these findings, the theoretical and practical effects of the obtained data were discussed and suggestions were made to managers and future studies.

Özet

Örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel özdeşleşme kavramları, örgütlerde çalışanların davranışlarını belirlemeleri açısından araştırmacılar tarafından daima ilgi çekici bulunmuşlardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel adalet ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkinin tespit edilmesidir. Bu amacın gerçekleştirilmesine yönelik olarak İzmir ilinde faaliyet gösteren bir üretim firmasındaki 260 çalışanın 192’sinden anket tekniği kullanılarak veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bu veriler SPSS ve AMOS istatistik programları kullanılarak analiz edilmişlerdir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, örgütsel adalet ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Örgütsel adalet boyutları ile örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisine ait sonuçlara göre ise; dağıtım adaleti ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu, prosedür ve etkileşim adaleti boyutları ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasında ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ortaya çıkan sonuçlar örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkiyi araştıran çalışma sonuçları ile benzer çıkmıştır. Bu bulgular sonucunda, elde edilen verilerin teorik ve pratik etkileri tartışılmış, yöneticilere ve gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAK, D. (2019). Analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Identification. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 18, 1001–1024. https://ajindex.com/articles/896760

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), “Advances in experimental social psychology”, New York: Academic Press. 2, 267–299.
  2. Aksoy, S. ve Ertürk, A. (2014). Influence of organizational justice perception on organizational identification. Research Journal of Business & Management-RJBM, 1(3), 253-262.
  3. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  4. Başar, U. ve Sığrı, Ü. (2015). Effects of teachers' organizational justice perceptions on intention to quit: mediation role of organizational identification. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 45-59.
  5. Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. New York: J Wiley & Sons, 352. Castillo, C. ve Fernández Alarcón, V. (2017). Relationships between the dimensions of organizational justice and students’ satisfaction in university Contexts. Intangible Capital, 13(2), 282-301.
  6. Chen, S. Y., Wu, W. C., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. T., Kung, J. Y., Weng, H. C., ve Lee, S. I. (2015). Organizational justice, trust, and identification and their effects on organizational commitment in hospital nursing staff. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-17.
  7. Cheung, M. F., ve Law, M. C. (2008). Relationships of organizational justice and organizational identification: The mediating effects of perceived organizational support in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(2), 213-231.
  8. Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
  9. Colquitt, J. A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology. Kozlowski, S. W. (Ed.). Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.
  10. Cronbach L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychomerika, 16, 297-334.
  11. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., ve Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
  12. Edwards, M. R. (2005) Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 207–230.
  13. Eib, C. (2015). Processes of organizational justice: insights into the perception and enactment of justice (Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University). Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. M. ve Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990) Effects of perceived organizational support on employee diligence, innovation, and commitment. Journal of Applied Psych