Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Kronik hepatit C’de üçlü tedavi: bir üniversite hastanesi gastroenteroloji kliniğinin deneyimi

Pages
92–97
Publication Date
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Seven 77.8% of 9 cirrhotic patients completed the planned treatment and sustained virological response was achieved in 5 55.6 patients. 12 85.7% of 14 non-cirrhotic patients completed the planned treatment and sustained virological response was achieved in 11 78.5% patients.Treatment was discontinued in 4 17.4% patients due to various side effects.Conclusion: Taking into consideration that novel interferon free treatment regimens are not available in our country yet, triple combination with Pegylated interferon+ribavirin and protease inhibitor is still a treatment option for chronic hepatitis C in selected cases

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Pegylated interferon+ribavirin dual combination had been the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C for years.Recently protease inhibitors were added to this combination.In this manuscript, we aimed to review the data of the patients to whom Pegylated interferon+ribavirin+protease inhibitor containing triple therapy regimen were given in our clinic.Material and Method: This was a retrospective study and 23 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with triple therapy regimen in Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, between December 2012 and December 2015 were included.Results: There were 18 78.3% male and 5 21.7% female patients and median age was 58 years range 42-70 years . 16 69.6% patients achieved sustained virological response.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirteen 72.2% of 18 patients on telaprevir regimen and 3 60% of 5 patients on boceprevir regimen achieved sustained virological response.When virological response in the prior pegylated interferon+ribavirin treatment was taken into consideration;10 90.1% of 11 patients with relapse,3 patients 100% with partial response and 2 50% of 4 non-responders were found to achieve sustained virological response.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Seven 77.8% of 9 cirrhotic patients completed the planned treatment and sustained virological response was achieved in 5 55.6 patients. 12 85.7% of 14 non-cirrhotic patients completed the planned treatment and sustained virological response was achieved in 11 78.5% patients.Treatment was discontinued in 4 17.4% patients due to various side effects.Conclusion: Taking into consideration that novel interferon free treatment regimens are not available in our country yet, triple combination with Pegylated interferon+ribavirin and protease inhibitor is still a treatment option for chronic hepatitis C in selected cases
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Hepatit C · telaprevir · boseprevir

Abstract

Objective: Pegylated interferon+ribavirin dual combination had been the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C for years.Recently protease inhibitors were added to this combination.In this manuscript, we aimed to review the data of the patients to whom Pegylated interferon+ribavirin+protease inhibitor containing triple therapy regimen were given in our clinic.Material and Method: This was a retrospective study and 23 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with triple therapy regimen in Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, between December 2012 and December 2015 were included.Results: There were 18 78.3% male and 5 21.7% female patients and median age was 58 years range 42-70 years . 16 69.6% patients achieved sustained virological response. Thirteen 72.2% of 18 patients on telaprevir regimen and 3 60% of 5 patients on boceprevir regimen achieved sustained virological response.When virological response in the prior pegylated interferon+ribavirin treatment was taken into consideration;10 90.1% of 11 patients with relapse,3 patients 100% with partial response and 2 50% of 4 non-responders were found to achieve sustained virological response. Seven 77.8% of 9 cirrhotic patients completed the planned treatment and sustained virological response was achieved in 5 55.6 patients. 12 85.7% of 14 non-cirrhotic patients completed the planned treatment and sustained virological response was achieved in 11 78.5% patients.Treatment was discontinued in 4 17.4% patients due to various side effects.Conclusion: Taking into consideration that novel interferon free treatment regimens are not available in our country yet, triple combination with Pegylated interferon+ribavirin and protease inhibitor is still a treatment option for chronic hepatitis C in selected cases

Özet

Amaç: Pegile interferon+ribavirin kombinasyonu uzun yıllar kronik hepatit C tedavisinde standart tedavi olmuştur. Son yıllarda proteaz inhibitörleri bu kombinasyona ilave edilmiş ve daha yüksek kalıcı virolojik yanıt oranları elde edilebilmiştir. Biz bu çalışmada kliniğimizde takip edilen ve PEG-İFN+ribavirin+proteaz inhibitörü içeren üçlü tedavi alan hastalarımızın verilerini retrospektif olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi Gastroenteroloji Kliniğine Aralık 2012-Aralık 2015 tarihleri arasında başvuran ve proteaz inhibitörü içeren 3’lü tedavi verilen 23 kronik HCV hastasının verileri retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir.Bulgular: Hastaların 18’i %78,3 kadın ve 5’i %21,7 erkek ve median yaşları 58 yıl Aralık 42-70 yıl idi. Toplam 16 hastada %69,6 kalıcı virolojik yanıt elde edilmişti. Telaprevir kullanan 18 hastanın 13’ünde %72,2 ve boseprevir kullanan 5 hastanın 3’ünde %60 kalıcı virolojik yanıt elde edildi. Daha önce PEG IFN+ribavirin ikili tedavisi alıp nüks olan 11 hastanın 10’unda %90,1 , kısmi yanıt veren 3 hastanın tamamında ve ilk tedavide primer yanıtsız olan 4 hastanın 2’sinde %50 kalıcı virolojik yanıt elde edildi. Sirotik olan 9 hastanın 7’si %77,8 planlanan tedavi süresini tamamladı, 5 hastada %55,6 kalıcı virolojik yanıt elde edildi. Sirozu olmayan 14 hastanın 12’si %85,7 tedaviyi tamamlarken, bu hastaların 11’inde %78,5 kalıcı virolojik yanıt elde edildi. 4 hastada %17,4 çeşitli yan etkiler nedeniyle tedavi süresi tamamlanamadı.Sonuç: İnterferonsuz tedavi rejimlerinin ülkemizde henüz rutin kullanıma girmediği göz önüne alınırsa, seçilmiş vakalarda PEG IFN, ribavirin ve bir proteaz inhibitörü içeren üçlü tedavilerin hala bir seçenek olabileceği kanaatindeyiz

🔖

Cite This Article

ASIL, M., YOLAÇAN, R., DERTLİ, R., BIYIK, M., ATASEVEN, H., POLAT, H., DEMİR, A. (2016). Kronik hepatit C’de üçlü tedavi: bir üniversite hastanesi gastroenteroloji kliniğinin deneyimi. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 92–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/895736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Zaltron S, Spinetti A, Biasi L, Baiguera C, Castelli F. Chro- nic HCV infection: Epidemiological and clinical relevance. BMC Infect 2012; 12(Suppl. 2): S2. Mohd Hanafiah K, Groeger J, Flaxman AD, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence. Hepatology 2013;57:1333-42.
  2. Simmonds P, Bukh J, Combet C, et al. Consensus proposals for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology 2005;42: 962-73.
  3. Steinhauer DA, Domingo E, Holland JJ. Lack of eviden- ce for proofreading mechanisms associated with an RNA viruspolymerase. Gene 1992; 122: 281-8.
  4. Bozdayi AM, Aslan N, Bozdayi G, et al. Molecular epide- miology of hepatitis B, C and D viruses in Turkish patients. Arch Virol 2004;149:2115-29.
  5. Abacioglu YH, Davidson F, Tuncer S, et al. The distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in Turkish patients. J Viral Hepat 1995; 2: 297-301.
  6. Altuglu I, Soyler I, Ozacar T, Erensoy S. Distribution of he- patitis C virus genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in Western Turkey. Int J Infect 2008; 12: 239-44. Dincer D. Hepatit C Epidemiyolojisi ve Patogenezi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gastroenterohepatol-Special 2010; 3: 77-80.
  7. Tozun N, Ozdogan OC, Cakaloglu Y, et al. A Nationwide prevalance study and risk factors for hepatitis A, B, C and D infections in Turkey Hepatology 2010; 52(Suppl 1); 697. Tabak F, Tosun S, Balık İ, ve ark. Ülkemizde HBV ve HCV seroprevalansı değişiyor mu? [Özet]. XI. Ulusal Viral He- patit Kongresi (12-15 Nisan 2012, Antalya) Kitabı. Ankara: Viral Hepatitle Savaşım Derneği, 2012: 69. Farci P, Shimoda A, Coiana A, et al. The outcome of acute hepatitis C predicted by the evolution of the viral quasispe- cies. Science 2000;288: 339-44.
  8. Veldt BJ, Heathcote EJ, Wedemeyer H, et al. Sustained vi- rologic response and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis. Ann Intern 2007;147:677-84.
  9. Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seef LB, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis, ma- nagement, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepato- logy 2009;49:133574. Cunningham M, Foster GR. Efficacy and safety of telapre- vir in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection. Therap Adv 2012; 5: 139-51. Habersetzer F,Leboeuf C, Doffoel M, Baumert TF. Bocepre- vir and personalized medicine in hepatitis C virus infecti- on. Pharmgenomics Pers 2012; 5: 125-37.
  10. Kurt H, Battal I, Memikoğlu O, Yeşilkaya A,