SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2

Comparison of c reactive protein levels with different devices and methods

C reaktif protein düzeylerinin farklı cihazlar ve yöntemlerle karşılaştırılması

Özgür ASLAN
Revşa Evin Canpolat ERKAN
Pages
106–111
Publication Date
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All samples were studied in Immage 800, Architect c16000, Beckman AU680, Cobas C501 devices.Results: When CRP results in BN II System and Immage 800 devices were compared dichotomously, it was found to be a significant difference p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: C-reactive protein CRP is used as a marker in inflammatory diseases, cardiovascular events, and many cases associated with trauma and inflammation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, different devices and immunonephelometric and immunoturbidimetric method were compared.Material and Methods: Routinely studied 150 CRP samples in BN II System Siemens, Germany were included into the study by forming 4 level 10 mg/L .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All samples were studied in Immage 800, Architect c16000, Beckman AU680, Cobas C501 devices.Results: When CRP results in BN II System and Immage 800 devices were compared dichotomously, it was found to be a significant difference p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turbidimetre · nefelometre · C-reaktif protein

Abstract

Objective: C-reactive protein CRP is used as a marker in inflammatory diseases, cardiovascular events, and many cases associated with trauma and inflammation. In this study, different devices and immunonephelometric and immunoturbidimetric method were compared.Material and Methods: Routinely studied 150 CRP samples in BN II System Siemens, Germany were included into the study by forming 4 level 10 mg/L . All samples were studied in Immage 800, Architect c16000, Beckman AU680, Cobas C501 devices.Results: When CRP results in BN II System and Immage 800 devices were compared dichotomously, it was found to be a significant difference p

Özet

Amaç: C-reaktif protein CRP ; inflamatuvar hastalıklarda, kardiyovasküler olaylarda, travma ve inflamasyonla ilişkili bir çok durumda belirteç olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada farklı cihazlar ile immunnefelometrik ve immunturbidimetrik yöntemler karşılaştırılmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: BN II System Siemens Diagnostics, Germany ’de rutin olarak çalışılan 150 CRP numunesi 4 düzey 10 mg/L oluşturularak çalışmaya alındı. Tüm numuneler Immage 800, Architect c16000, Beckman AU680, Cobas C501 cihazlarında çalışıldı.Bulgular: İkili grup olarak immunnefelometrik BN II System ve Immage 800 cihazlarındaki CRP sonuçları karşılaştırıldığında aralarında anlamlı fark olduğu saptanmıştır p

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, Ö., ERKAN, R. E. C. (2020). Comparison of c reactive protein levels with different devices and methods. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2, 106–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/895704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Chan YL, Liao HC, Tsay PK, Chang SS, Chen JC, Liaw SJ. C-reactive protein as an indicator of bacterial infection of adult patients in the emergency department. Chang Gung Med J 2002; 25:437-45.
  2. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest 2003;111:1805-12.
  3. Pinilla JC, Hayes P, Laverty W, Arnold C, Laxdal V. The C-reactive protein to prealbumin ratio correlates with the severity of multiple organ dysfunction. Surgery 1998;124:799-805.
  4. Pang X, Liu J, Li Y, Zhao J, Zhang X. Emodin Inhibits Ho- mocysteine-Induced C-Reactive Protein Generation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell byRegulating PPARγ Exp- ression and ROS-ERK1/2/p38 Signal Pathway. PLoS One 2015;10:e0131295. Qu J, L X, Liu Y, Wang X. Evaluation of procalcitonin, C-re- active protein, interleukin-6 & serum amyloid A as diag- nostic biomarkers of bacterial infection in febrile patients. Indian J Med Res 2015;141:315-21.
  5. Luo Y, Zhang B, Chen M, Jiang T, Zhou D, Huang J, Fu W. Sensitive and rapid quantification of C-reactive prote- in using quantum dot-labeled microplate immunoassay J Transl Med 2012; 10: 24. Ledue TB, Weiner DL, Sipe JD, Poulin SE, Collins MF, Rifai N. Analytical evaluation of particle-enhanced immunonep- helometric assays for C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A and mannose-binding protein in human serum. Ann Clin Biochem 1998;35:745-53.
  6. Mali B, Armbruster D, Serediak E, Ottenbreit T. Compa- rison of immunoturbidimetric and immunonephelometric assays for specific proteins. Clin Biochem 2009; 42:1568-71.
  7. Helal I, Zerelli L, Krid M, ElYounsi F, Maiz BH, Zouari B, et al. Comparison of C-reactive protein and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in patients on hemodialysis. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012; 23(3): 477-83.
  8. Lolekha PH, Chittamma A, Roberts WL, Sritara P, Cheepu- domwit S, Suriyawongpaisal P. Comparative study of two automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein methods in a large population. Clin Biochem 2005; 38:31-5.
  9. Marie Dupuy A, Boutet A, Paul Cristol J.Evaluation of the high-sensitivity, full-range Olympus CRP OSR6199 application on the Olympus AU640. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:402-6.
  10. Correia LC, Lima JC, Gerstenblith G, Magalhães LP, Morei- ra A, Barbosa O Jr, et al. Correlation between turbidimetric and nephelometric methods of measuring C- reactive pro- tein in patients with unstable angina or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. Arq Bras Cardiol 2003; 81:129- 32. Wei TQ, Kramer S, Chu VP, Hudson D, Kilgore D, Salyer S, et