Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 65

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TOUCHMATH TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING MULTIPLICATION TO STUDENTS WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER

OTIZM SPEKTRUM BOZUKLUĞU OLAN ÖĞRENCİLERE ÇARPMA İŞLEMİ ÖĞRETİMİNDE NOKTA BELİRLEME TEKNİĞİNİN ETKİLİLİĞİ

Semra Kuh Akgün(TEV Zahide Zehra Garring Ortaokulu)0000-0001-8586-6521
Özcan Karaaslan(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4672-5678
Hatice Şengül Erdem(İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2933-8198
Pages
260–287
Publication Date
2023-01-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the TouchMath technique was effective in teaching multiplication skills to students with ASD and the maintenance of the acquired skill continued after the application ended, and that the multiplication skill could be generalized to both a different classroom environment and a different teacher.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study determines whether the TouchMath technique which is presented by using with direct teaching method is effective or not in teaching multiplication skills to children with ¨Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)¨.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three students with ASD aged 8-10 years, who were diagnosed with ASD participated in the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the TouchMath technique was effective in teaching multiplication skills to students with ASD and the maintenance of the acquired skill continued after the application ended, and that the multiplication skill could be generalized to both a different classroom environment and a different teacher.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu (OSB) · OSB'li Öğrenciler · Çarpma İşlemi Öğretimi

Abstract

The aim of this study determines whether the TouchMath technique which is presented by using with direct teaching method is effective or not in teaching multiplication skills to children with ¨Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)¨. Three students with ASD aged 8-10 years, who were diagnosed with ASD participated in the research. In the study, a multiple probe model with between-subject probe trials was used. The dependent variable of this research is the level of the subjects to carry out multiplication skills. The independent variable was TouchMath procedure which was used to teach multiplication fact skills to the subjects. The results indicated that the TouchMath technique was effective in teaching multiplication skills to students with ASD and the maintenance of the acquired skill continued after the application ended, and that the multiplication skill could be generalized to both a different classroom environment and a different teacher. Teachers gave positive opinions about the teaching process with the TouchMath technique

Özet

Bu araştırmada, ¨Doğrudan Öğretim Yöntemiyle (DÖY)¨ sunulan ¨Nokta Belirleme Tekniğinin (NBT)¨, ¨Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu (OSB)¨ olan öğrencilere çarpma işlemi öğretimindeki etkililiğinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya OSB tanısı almış, 8-10 yaşlarında üç öğrenci yer almıştır. Araştırma; denekler arası yoklama denemeli çoklu yoklama modeli kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın bağımlı değişkeni, OSB’li öğrencilerin çarpma işlemlerini gerçekleştirme düzeyi, bağımsız değişkeni ise DÖY ile sunulan NBT’dir. Sonuçlar, OSB’li öğrencilere çarpma işlem becerilerinin öğretiminde NBT’nin etkili olduğunu, uygulama bittikten sonra edinilen becerinin kalıcılığının devam ettiğini ve temel çarpma işlem becerisinin hem farklı sınıf ortamına hem de farklı bir öğretmene genellenebildiğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin NBT ile yapılan öğretim süreci hakkında olumlu görüş bildirdikleri görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akgün, S. K., Karaaslan, Ö., Karaaslan, D. D. Ö., Erdem, H. Ş. (2023). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TOUCHMATH TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING MULTIPLICATION TO STUDENTS WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 65, 260–287. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1110195

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. Akmanoğlu, N. ve Batu, S. (2004). Teaching pointing to numerals to individuals with autism using simultaneous prompting. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(4), 326-336.
  2. Alaaudein, A. A. ve Sahwan, E. H. A. S. (2014). The effectiveness of TouchMath on improving academic achievement on math addition in children with Autism. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 3(3), 60-65.
  3. Al-Hmouz, H. (2018). The effectiveness of the touch math program in teaching addition to students with math disability. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(4), 461-474.
  4. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5.bs.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  5. Assouline, S. G., Nicpon, M. F. ve Dockery, L. (2012). Predicting the academic achievement of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal Autism and Developmental Disorder, 42(9), 1781–1789. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1403-x Avant, M. J. T. ve Heller, K. W. (2011). Examining the effectiveness of TouchMath with students with physical disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 309-321. doi:10.1177/0741932510362198
  6. Aydemir, T. (2017). Zihin yetersizliği olan öğrencilere temel çarpma işleminin öğretiminde iki öğretim uygulamasının etkililik ve verimlilik yönünden karşılaştırılması. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  7. Badır Polat, T. ve Yıkmış, (2019). Zihin engelli öğrencilere çıkarma işlemi öğretiminde sabit bekleme süreli öğretimle sunulan Nokta Belirleme Tekniğinin etkililiği. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 767-781. doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2019.19.49440-519075
  8. Bakan, S. (2017). Nokta Belirleme Tekniğinin bir kaynaştırma öğrencisinin matematik başarısı ve öz-yeterlilik algı düzeyine etkililiği. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi. İnönü Üniversitesi.
  9. Barr, F. ve Mavropoulou, S. (2019). Curriculum accommodations in mathematics instruction for adolescents with mild intellectual disability educated in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(2), 270-286. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2019.1684457
  10. Bergman, S. H. (2014). The effectiveness of using TouchMath addition techniques with students with learning disabilities. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Concordia University.
  11. Berry, D. (2007). The effectiveness of the TouchMath curriculum to teach addition and subtraction to elementary aged students identified with autism. http://www.touchmath.com/pdf/TouchmathAutism.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  12. Bowman, J. A., McDonnell, J., Ryan, J. H. ve Fudge-Coleman, O. (2019). Effective mathematics instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 195–204. doi:10.1177/1088357619827932
  13. Cervantes, P. E., Matson, J. L., Williams, L. W. ve Jang, J. (2014). The effect of cognitive skills and autism spectrum disorder on stereotyped behaviors in infants and toddlers. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(5), 502–508. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.01.008
  14. Cihak, D. F. ve Foust, J. L. (2008). Comparing number lines and touch points to teach addition facts to students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23(3), 131-137. doi:10.1177/1088357608318950
  15. Cox, S. K. ve Jimenez, B. A. (2020). Mathematical interventions for students with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for practitioners. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 105, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103744
  16. Çalık, N. C. ve Kargın, T. (2010). Effectiveness of the Touch Math technique in teaching addition skills to students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 25 (1), 195-204.
  17. Day, L. (2015). Mathematically rich, investigative tasks for teaching algebra. Mathematics Teacher, 108(7), 512-518. doi:10.5951/mathteacher.108.7.0512
  18. Dev, P. C., Doyle, B. A., ve Valente, B. (2002). Labels needn't stick:" At-risk" first graders rescued with appropriate intervention. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7(3), 327-332.
  19. Donlan, C., Cowan, R., Newton, E. J. ve Lloyd, D. (2007). The role of language in mathematical development: Evidence from children with specific language impairments. Cognition, 103(1), 23–33. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.007
  20. Eichel, A. (2007). Math interventions for a student with autism. Summer Student Research Project, Nebraska Kearney University. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.548.4712&rep=rep1&type=pdf adresinden erişildi.
  21. Eliçin, Ö., Dağseven Emecen, D. ve Yıkmış, A. (2013). Zihin engelli çocuklara doğrudan öğretim yöntemiyle temel toplama işlemlerinin öğretiminde nokta belirleme tekniği kullanılarak yapılan öğretimin etkililiği. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 37(37), 118-136.
  22. Erbaş, D. (2018). Güvenirlik. E. Tekin-İftar (Yay. Haz.), Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araştırmalar, (2. bs) içinde (s.109-128). Anı Yayıncılık.
  23. Fletcher, D., Boon, R.T. ve Cihak, D.F. (2010). Effects of the TouchMath program compared to a number line strategy to teach addition facts to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(3), 449-458.
  24. Gevarter, C., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B., Watkins, L., Zamora, C. ve Sammarco, N. (2016). Mathematics interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Review Journal Autism Developmental Disorders, 3, 224-238. doi:10.1007/s40489-016-0078-9
  25. Gürsel, O. (2019). Nokta belirleme tekniği. Oğuz Gürsel (Yay. Haz.) Özel gereksinimli öğrencilere matematik beceri ve kavramlarının öğretimini planlama ve uygulama (3. bs.) içinde (s. 311-340). Vize akademik.
  26. Harris, M., Helling, J., Thompson, L., Neyman, J., McLaughlin, T. F., Hatch, K. ve Jack, M. (2015). The effects of a direct instruction flashcard system to teach two students with disabilities multiplication facts. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(3), 66-77.
  27. Hart Barnett, J. E. ve Cleary, S. (2015). Review of evidence-based mathematics interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(2), 172–185.
  28. Hart Barnett, J. E. ve Cleary, S. (2019). Visual supports to teach algebraic equations to a middle school student with autism spectrum disorder. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 63(4), 345–351. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2019.1608897
  29. Huckaby, A. M. (2019). Is TouchMath an effective intervention for students with autism? Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 256. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/256 adresinden erişildi.
  30. Hughes, C. (2011). Changes and challenges in 20 years of research into the development of executive functions. Infant and Child Development, 20 (3), 251-271. doi:10.1002/icd.736
  31. Karaaslan, Ö. & Karaaslan, D. (2016). Otizmli çocukların tıbbi tanılama sürecinde yer alan uzman doktorların tanılamaya ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(2), 271-293.
  32. Kasap, C. ve Ergenekon, Y. (2017). Effects of a schema approach for the achievement of the verbal mathematics problem-solving skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(6), 1787-1809. doi:10.12738/estp.2017.6.0660
  33. Kasari, C., Freeman, S. ve Paparella, T. (2006). Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 611–620. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01567.x
  34. Keskin, N. K. (2016). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan öğrencilere temel çıkarma işlemi öğretiminde nokta belirleme tekniğinin etkililiği. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
  35. King, S. A., Lemons, C. J. ve Davidson, K. A. (2016). Math interventions for students with autism spectrum disorder: A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82(4),443-462. doi: 10.1177/0014402915625066
  36. Kot, M. (2019). Zihin yetersizliği olan öğrencilere çarpma ve bölme işlemlerinin öğretiminde nokta belirleme tekniğinin farklı sunumlarının karşılaştırılması. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
  37. Kramer, T. ve Krug, D.A. (1973). A rationale and procedure for teaching addition. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 8, 140-145.
  38. Kroesbergen, E.H. ve Van Luit, J.E., (2003). Mathematics Interventions for Children with Special Educational Needs, A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97-114. doi:10.1177/07419325030240020501
  39. Levingston, H. B., Neef, N. A. ve Cihon, T. M. (2009). The effects of teaching precurrent behaviors on children’s solution of multiplication and division word problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 361–367. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-361
  40. Machalicek, W., O’Reilly, M. F., Beretvas, N., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Sorrells, A. … Rispoli, M.J. (2008). A review of school-based instructional interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 395–416. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2007.07.001
  41. Mostafa, A. A. (2013). The effectiveness of touch math intervention in teaching addition skills to preschoolers at-risk for future learning disabilities. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 2(3), 15-22.
  42. NCAEP (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. https://ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/sites/ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/files/imce/documents/EBP%20Report%202020.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  43. Nelson, J. A. (2019). An investigation of the effectiveness of TouchMath on mathematics achievement for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Kansas State University.
  44. Park, J., Bassette, L. ve Bouck, E. (2021). Using touchmath to teach money identification to students with autism spectrum disorders: A brief report. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 1-9. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2021.1882665
  45. Plavnick, J. B., Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Thompson, J. L. ve Wood, A. L. (2015). A review of explicit and systematic scripted instructional programs for students with autism spectrum disorder. Review of Journal Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2, 55–66. doi:10.1007/s40489-014-0036-3
  46. Reyes, J. D. (2019). Increasing self-efficacy and alleviating anxiety using touch math and instructional games: an intervention for low performing seventh graders. Journal of Humanities and Education Development (JHED), 1(2), 59-74. doi:10.22161/jhed.1.2.2
  47. Tekin-İftar, E. (2018). Tek-denekli araştırmalar ve temel kavramlar. E. Tekin-İftar (Yay. Haz.), Eğitim ve davranış bilimlerinde tek denekli araştırmalar (2. bs.) içinde (s.16-40). Anı Yayıncılık.
  48. Tekin-İftar, E. ve Değirmenci, H. D. (2019). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocukların öğretimi. E. Tekin-İftar (Yay. Haz.), Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocuklar ve eğitimleri (7. bs.) içinde (s.237-295). Vize Akademik. Terzioğlu, N. K. ve Yıkmış, A. (2017). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan öğrencilere temel çıkarma işlemi öğretiminde nokta belirleme tekniğinin etkililiği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(1), 1-27. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.298939
  49. Waters, H. E. ve Boon, R.T. (2011). Teaching money computation skills to high school students with mild intellectual disabilities via the Touchmath© program: A multi-sensory approach. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46 (4), 544-555.
  50. Weng, P-L., ve Bouck, E. C. (2014). Using video prompting via iPads to teach price comparison to adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(10), 1405–1415. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.014
  51. Vinson, B.M. (2004). A foundational research base for the TouchMath program. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Athens State University.
  52. Yıkmış, A. (2016). Effectiveness of the touch math technique in teaching basic addition to children with Autism. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(3), 1005-1025. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.3.2057
  53. Yıkmış, A., Kot, M., Terzioğlu, N. K. ve Aktaş, B. (2018). Türkiye’de özel eğitim alanında yapılan matematik araştırmalarının betimsel analizi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (4), 2475-2501. doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2018.18.41844-445908
  54. Yıkmış, A. ve Kot, M. (2019). Çarpma işlemleri. O. Gürsel (Yay. Haz.) Özel gereksinimli öğrencilere matematik beceri ve kavramlarının öğretimini planlama ve uygulama (3. bs) içinde (s. 311-340). Vize Akademik. Yusaini, N. A., Maat, S. M. ve Rosli, R. (2019). Touch-Point mathematics instruction for children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 609–625. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i3/5730