Journals / European Journal of Educational Research / 2015 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Concepts of Plants Held by Young Brazilian Children: An Exploratory Study

Pages
105–117
Publication Date
2015-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Children from southern and northern Brazil have a basic knowledge of plants, which they observe during their everyday life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Children ages between 3 to 10 years old (kindergarten & primary school), but the majority of them in the age group of 4-5 (total 145) were asked to draw what they think is a plant (total sample=332).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Educational implications of these findings are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:plant conception · preschool and primary school pupils · mental model

Abstract

Children from southern and northern Brazil have a basic knowledge of plants, which they observe during their everyday life. Children ages between 3 to 10 years old (kindergarten & primary school), but the majority of them in the age group of 4-5 (total 145) were asked to draw what they think is a plant (total sample=332). Afterwards, a equal number of boys and girls randomly chosen were interviewed individually (mix ability) to list plants they said they knew and where they had seen them. Then they were asked to give exemplars of the local plants which they had seen. These data from the exploratory study show that pupils are in touch with their environment and recognize plants that are part of it. The everyday experiences of these children in school and out of school, at home and in leisure activities with family and friends, contribute to their knowledge about plants and such knowledge is complemented in the preschool and primary school classes by appropriate teaching. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARTOSZECK, A. B., COSMO, C. R., DASİLVA, B. R., TUNNİCLİFFE, S. D. (2015). Concepts of Plants Held by Young Brazilian Children: An Exploratory Study. European Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 105–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/891879

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., and Medin, D. L. (2008). Naming practices and the acquisition of key biological concepts. Evidence from English and Indonesian. Psychological Science, 19(4): 314-319.
  2. Anning, A., Ring, K. (2004). Making sense of children´s drawings. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  3. Anning, A., Cullen, J., and Fleer, M. (2004). Early childhood education: society and culture. London: Sage. Ashbrook, P. (2008). First explorations in flower anatomy. Science and Children, 45(8):18-19.
  4. Azul, A. M., Reis, C. S., and Pimenta, M. C. (2007). Da semente ao fruto: à descoberta do mundo das plantas. Ciência Viva: Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Coimbra, Portugal. (From seed to fruit: discovery of the world of plants). Bang, M., Medin, D., and Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1004(35): 13868-13874.
  5. Barman, C. R., Stein, M., Barman, N. S., and McNair, S. (2002). Assessing students´ ideas about plants. Science & Children, 10(1): 25-29.
  6. Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., and Barman, N. S. (2006). Students´ ideas about plants & plant growth. The American Biology Teacher, 68(2):73-79.
  7. Barraza, L. (2001). Environmental education in Mexican schools: the primary level. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(3): 31-36.
  8. Barrett, M. D., Light, P. H. (1976). Symbolism and intellectual realism in children´s drawings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46:198-202.
  9. Bartoszeck, A. B., Silva, I. G. Da, and Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Brazilian children´s concept of bird: an exploratory study. Poster presented at the 9th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Lyon, France, September 5th-9th. Bartoszeck, A. B., Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2013). What do early years children think is inside a tree. Journal of Emergent Science, Winter, 21-25.
  10. Bebbington, A. (2005). The ability of A-level students to name plants. Journal of Biological Education, 39:63-67.
  11. Bell, B. (1981). What is a plant? Some children´s ideas. New Zealand Science Teacher, 31(3):10-14.
  12. Bianchi, L. (2000). So what do you think a plant is? Primary Science Review, 61:15-17.
  13. Blanquet, E. (2010). Sciences à l´école, Côte jardin-le guide practique de l´enseignant. Nice: Éditions du Somnium. (Science at school, a practical guide in the kindergarten). Boulter, C., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Reiss, and M. J., Selles, S. (2004). The social relevance of pupils´responses to cues from the na