SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 54

-

KENDİNİ SABOTAJ İLE PSİKOLOJİK İYİ OLMA ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN ÇEŞİTLİ DEĞİŞKENLER AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Gazanfer ANLI
Ahmet AKIN
Ali ŞAR
Halime EKER
Pages
0
Publication Date
2015-04-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The students’ level of self-handicapping shows significant differences concerning with gender and no significant differences concerning with perceived income status and parental attitudes; the students’ level of psychological well-being shows significant differences concerning with gender and perceived income status and no significant differences concerning with parental attitudes

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between self-handicapping and psychological well-being.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A further aim of the study is to examine the relationship of these two concepts whether or not showingsignificant differences in terms of the variables of gender, perceived income status, and parental attitudes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The students’ level of self-handicapping shows significant differences concerning with gender and no significant differences concerning with perceived income status and parental attitudes; the students’ level of psychological well-being shows significant differences concerning with gender and perceived income status and no significant differences concerning with parental attitudes
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kendini sabotaj · Psikolojik iyi olma · Ebeveyn tutumları

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between self-handicapping and psychological well-being. A further aim of the study is to examine the relationship of these two concepts whether or not showingsignificant differences in terms of the variables of gender, perceived income status, and parental attitudes. The research population was composed of 316 students studying at undergraduate degree at various departments in Sakarya University. In consequence of this research, there’s a significant negative relationship between self-handicapping and psychological well-being. The students’ level of self-handicapping shows significant differences concerning with gender and no significant differences concerning with perceived income status and parental attitudes; the students’ level of psychological well-being shows significant differences concerning with gender and perceived income status and no significant differences concerning with parental attitudes

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı kendini sabotaj ile psikolojik iyi olma arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu iki kavram arasındaki ilişkinin cinsiyet, algılanan gelir düzeyi, ebeveyn tutumları değişkenleri açısından anlamlı bir farklılık gösterip göstermediğini incelemektir. Araştırma Sakarya Üniversitesi’nin çeşitli bölümlerinde lisans öğrenimi gören 316 öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, kendini sabotaj ile psikolojik iyi olma arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Üniversite öğrencilerinin kendini sabotaj düzeylerinin cinsiyet açısından anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiği, algılanan gelir düzeyi ve ebeveyn tutumları açısından ise anlamlı farklılıklar göstermediği bulunmuş; psikolojik iyi olma düzeylerinin ise cinsiyet ve algılanan gelir düzeyi açısından anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiği, ebeveyn tutumları açısından anlamlı farklılıklar göstermediği bulunmuştur.Anahtar Kelimeler: Kendini sabotaj, Psikolojik iyi olma, Ebeveyn tutumları

🔖

Cite This Article

ANLI, G., AKIN, A., ŞAR, A., EKER, H. (2015). -. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 54, 0. https://ajindex.com/articles/89034

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akın, A. (2008). Psikolojik İyi Olma Ölçekleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8(3), 721-750. (SSCI) Akın, A., Abacı, R. ve Akın, Ü. (2010).Kendini Sabotaj Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması.16. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi, 14-17
  2. Nisan, Mersin. Anderson, M. R. (1977). A study of the relationship between life satisfaction and self– concept, locus of control, satisfaction with primary relationships, and work satisfaction.Michigan State University, Yayınlanmamışdoktoratezi. Andrews, F. M. veWithey S.B. (1976).Social Indicators of Well-Being. New York: Plenum Press.
  3. Baumgardner, A. H. (1991). Claiming depressive symptoms as a self-handicap: A protective self-presentation strategy.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 97-1.13. Berglas, S. ve Jones, E. E. (1978).Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to non-contingent success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 405- 417. Betton, A. (2001). Psychological well-being: A comparison of correlates among minority and non-minority female college students. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Yayınlanmamışyükseklisanstezi. Braun, P. M. W. (1977). Psychological well-being and location in the social structure.University of Southern California, Yayınlanmamışdoktoratezi. Campbell, A., Converse, P.ve Rodgers, W. (1976).
  4. The quality of American life, New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill. Cox, C. B. ve Giuliano, T. A. (1999).Constructing obstacles vs. making excuses: Examining perceivers' reactions to behavioral and self-reported self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(3), 419-433.
  5. Doebler, T. C., Schick, C., Beck, B. ve Astor-Stetson, E. (2000).Ego protection: The effects of gender and perfectionism on acquired and claimed self-handicapping and self- esteem. College Student Journal, 34, 524-537.
  6. Harris, R. N. ve Snyder, C. R. (1986).The role of uncertain self-esteem in self- handicapping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451-458.
  7. Hobden, K. vePliner, P. (1995). Self-handicappinganddimensions of perfectionism: Selfpresentation vs. self-protection. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 461-474.
  8. Jones, E. E. veBerglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self- handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulle