Exploring Adaptation Abilities of Barley Genotypes in Van Growing Conditions for Biomass and Grain Yield

Results indicated that PH ranged (51.7 to 81.33 cm) and (58.20 to 79.90 cm), SSM (374 to 582) and (418 to 701), SL (7.10 to 9.63 cm) and (6.87 to 9.13 cm), NSS (9 to 15) and (8 to 17), SPS (21 to 49) and (21 to 51), BY (3466.7 to 5905.3 kg h-1) and (3731.7 to 6080 kg h-1), GY (1442 to 2192 kg h-1) and (811.8 to 1763.7 kg h-1), TGW (34 to 55.67 g) and (33.47 to 52.63 g) for the first and second year of experiment respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:Discovering the variation among genotypes is an important criterion for selecting the suitable cultivar for a certain environment.

📊

Key Findings & Data:The study aimed to explore the genetic variation among 17 genotypes of barley based on grain yield and some related traits.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that PH ranged (51.7 to 81.33 cm) and (58.20 to 79.90 cm), SSM (374 to 582) and (418 to 701), SL (7.10 to 9.63 cm) and (6.87 to 9.13 cm), NSS (9 to 15) and (8 to 17), SPS (21 to 49) and (21 to 51), BY (3466.7 to 5905.3 kg h-1) and (3731.7 to 6080 kg h-1), GY (1442 to 2192 kg h-1) and (811.8 to 1763.7 kg h-1), TGW (34 to 55.67 g) and (33.47 to 52.63 g) for the first and second year of experiment respectively.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Advanced lines of barley · Barley cultivars · Grain yield

Abstract

Discovering the variation among genotypes is an important criterion for selecting the suitable cultivar for a certain environment. The study aimed to explore the genetic variation among 17 genotypes of barley based on grain yield and some related traits. Plants were grown under field grown conditions in the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 growing seasons, and plant height (PH), spike per square meter (SSM), spike length (SL), spikelets per spike (NSS), seed per spike (SPS), biological yield (BY), grain yield (GY), and thousand grain weight (TGW) were measured. Results indicated that PH ranged (51.7 to 81.33 cm) and (58.20 to 79.90 cm), SSM (374 to 582) and (418 to 701), SL (7.10 to 9.63 cm) and (6.87 to 9.13 cm), NSS (9 to 15) and (8 to 17), SPS (21 to 49) and (21 to 51), BY (3466.7 to 5905.3 kg h-1) and (3731.7 to 6080 kg h-1), GY (1442 to 2192 kg h-1) and (811.8 to 1763.7 kg h-1), TGW (34 to 55.67 g) and (33.47 to 52.63 g) for the first and second year of experiment respectively. The advanced lines measurement values were higher in the second year of the experiment. It can be concluded that the advanced lines Anka-08 and Anka-11 are promising in most of the parameters. Some of the old and new cultivars still preserve their yield potential.

Keywords

Advanced lines of barley Barley cultivars Grain yield

🔖

Cite This Article

SALİH, S., ÖNGÜN, B., ÖZDEMİR, B., ORAL, E., ALTUNER, F., ATMACA, Ş. D. A. D., ÜLKER, M. (2023). Exploring Adaptation Abilities of Barley Genotypes in Van Growing Conditions for Biomass and Grain Yield. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 91–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/889910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

Ahmadi, J., Vaezi, B., & Pour-Aboughadareh, A. (2016). Analysis of variability, heritability, and interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in barley advanced lines. Genetika, 48(1), 73-85. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1601073A. Ay, H., Aykanat, S., Anay, A., Akkaya, M. R., & Zeybek, A. (2018). Agronomic and Quality Evaluation of Rainfed Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) in Eastern Mediterranean Condition. Beşer, N., Kaya, Y., Civi, G., & GumusS, T. (2019). The evaluation of yield performances of some barley cultivars in Trakya region. Paper presented at the International Bioogical, Agricultural and Life Science Congress. Biel, W., Kazimierska, K., & Bashutska, U. (2020). Nutritional value of wheat, triticale, barley and oat grains. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica, 19 (2), 19-28. doi:10.21005/asp.2020.19.2.03 Cockram, J., Horsnell, R., Soh, E. H., Norris, C., & O’Sullivan, D. M. (2015). Molecular and phenotypic characterization of the alternative seasonal growth habit and flowering time in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.). Molecular Breeding, 35(8), 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-015-0359-5.
Cuesta-Marcos, A., Kling, J.G., Belcher, A.R., Filichkin, T., Fisk, P., Graebner, R., Helgerson, L., Herb, D., Meints, B., Ross, A.S., Hayes, P.M., & Ulrich, S.E. (2016). Barley: Genetics and Breeding. In C. Wrigley, H. Corke, K. Seetharaman & J. Faubion (Eds), Encyclopedia of Food Grains (pp. 287-295).
Academic Press.
Dorostkar, S., Pakniyat, H., Kordshooli, M. A., Aliakbari, M., Sobhanian, N., Ghorbani, R., & Eskandari, M. (2015). Study of relationship between grain yield and yield components using multivariate analysis in barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Agriculture Research, 6, 240-250.
Erol, Oral, Kendal, E., & Dogan, Y. (2017). Investigation of yield and some quality criteria of summer barley genotypes in Adıyaman and Şanlıurfa-Hilvan conditions. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture, 31 (2), 23-36.
Ertuş, M. M. (2021). A Research on the Determination of Grain Yield of Some Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties in Late Autumn Sowing in The High Altitude Agricultural Area of Anatolia. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss1pp210-215 FAO, (2022). Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Access date: 03.11.2020.
Güngör, H., Cakir, M. F., & Dumlupinar, Z. (2022). Evaluation of wheat genotypes: genotype×