Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 170 - Sayı: 170

Evaluation of current earthquake activity on the Ganos Fault: MONGAN network test analysis

Pages
99–116
Publication Date
2023-04-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moment tensor analyzes depict that reliable source mechanism solutions can be obtained using a small number of station records.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Monitoring of the Ganos Fault data presents significant opportunities and challenges for earthquake detection, location and magnitude calculations, source mechanism solutions, and discovery of fault zone waves.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While narrow distance aperture installation has an opportunity to detect microearthquakes, it also causes significant difficulties in determining the source parameters of micro-earthquakes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moment tensor analyzes depict that reliable source mechanism solutions can be obtained using a small number of station records.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ganos Fault · Microearthquake · Fault Zone Waves

Abstract

The Monitoring of the Ganos Fault data presents significant opportunities and challenges for earthquake detection, location and magnitude calculations, source mechanism solutions, and discovery of fault zone waves. This study indicates mostly of preliminary data analysis and seismological evaluations. While narrow distance aperture installation has an opportunity to detect microearthquakes, it also causes significant difficulties in determining the source parameters of micro-earthquakes. Extracting microearthquakes from continuous data shows that special strategies need to be used. MONGAN data revealed the presence of many earthquakes with magnitude M<1.0 in the study region. These earthquakes are mostly out of network earthquakes and it is very difficult to obtain reliable solutions due to the insufficient azimuthal distribution of the stations. It is obvious that different network techniques and wave particle motion analyzes are contributed to the location and source parameters. Although the fault zone structure consists of two different lithologies that make significant differences in seismic wave phase arrival times and wave amplitudes, we observe fault zone head waves on both sides along the Ganos fault. Moment tensor analyzes depict that reliable source mechanism solutions can be obtained using a small number of station records.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINKAYA, E., BOHNHOFF, M., ALP, H., BENTZ, S., PINAR, A., ALVER, F., KILIÇARSLAN, Ö., TAMTAŞ, B. D., GÖRGÜN, B. (2023). Evaluation of current earthquake activity on the Ganos Fault: MONGAN network test analysis. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 170 - Sayı: 170, 99–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/887007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aksoy, M. E., Meghraoui, M., Vallée, M., Çakır, Z. 2010. Rupture characteristics of the AD 1912 Mürefte (Ganos) earthquake segment of the North Anatolian Fault (western Turkey). Geology 38(11), 991-994.
  2. Aksoy, M. E. 2021. The 9 August 1912 Mürefte-Şarköy earthquake of the North Anatolian fault. Mediterranean Geoscience Reviews 3, 95–114.
  3. Allam., A. A., Ben-Zion, Y., Peng, Z. 2014. Seismic imaging of a bimaterial interface along the Hayward Fault, CA, with Fault Zone Head waves and direkt P arrivals. Pure and Applied Geophysics 171, 2993-3011.
  4. Allen, R. 1978. Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68, 1521-1532.
  5. Andrews, D. J., Ben-Zion, Y. 1997. Wrinkle-like slip pulse on a fault between different materials. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 553–571.
  6. Armijo, R., Pondard, N., Meyer, B., Uçarkus, G., Mercier de Lépinay, B., Malavieille, J., Dominguez, S., Gutscher, M-A., Schmidt, S., Beck, C., Cagatay, N., Cakir, Z., Imren, C., Eris, K., Natalin, B., Özalaybey, S., Tolun, L., Lefèvre, I., Seeber, L., Gasperini, L., Rangin, C., Emre, O., Sarikavak, K. 2005. Submarine fault scarps in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart (North Anatolian Fault): implications for seismic hazard in Istanbul. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, AGU and the Geochemical Society 6, Q06009. Ben-Zion, Y. 1989. The response of two joined quarter spaces to SH line sources located at the material discontinuity interface. Geophysical Journal International 98, 213–222.
  7. Ben-Zion, Y. 1990. The response of two half spaces to point dislocations at the material interface. Geophysical Journal International 101, 507–528.
  8. Ben-Zion, Y., Aki, K. 1990. Seismic radiation from an SH line source in a laterally heterogeneous planar fault zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 80(4), 971-994.
  9. Ben-Zion, Y., Malin, P. 1991. San Andreas fault zone head waves near Parkfield, California. Science 251, 1592–1594.
  10. Bennington, N. L., Thurber, C., Peng, Z., Zhang H., Zhao P. 2013. Incorporating fault zone head wave and direct wave secondary arrival times into seismic tomography: Application at Parkfield, California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118, 1008-1014.
  11. Bentz, S., Martínez‐Garzón, P., Kwiatek, G., Dresen, G., Bohnhoff, M. 2019. Analysis of microseismicity framing ML > 2.5 earthquakes at The Geysers geothermal field, California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 124, 8823–8843.
  12. Bohnhoff, M., Bulut