Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2011 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

The impact of NIH-IV prostatitis on early post-operative outcomes of The impact of NIH-IV prostatitis on early post-operative outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia

Pages
515–519
Publication Date
2011-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: NIH-IV chronic prostatitis shows negative effects on the subjective post-operative results and re-catheterization frequency of BPH patients that have undergone TURP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transurethral prostate resection (TURP) is still considered the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Between 2004 and 2008, medical records of 247 patients who underwent TURP in Adana Numune Training and Research hospital were examined, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: NIH-IV chronic prostatitis shows negative effects on the subjective post-operative results and re-catheterization frequency of BPH patients that have undergone TURP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Key words: Chronic prostatitis · BPH · TURP

Abstract

Transurethral prostate resection (TURP) is still considered the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Category IV chronic prostatitis (CP) is described by the National Institute of Health (NIH-IV) as the asymptomatic inflammation of the prostate and it may be detected along with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) during histological examinations of the prostate. In this study, we evaluate the impact of the presence of NIH-IV defined prostatitis on early post-operative outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate. Materials and methods: Between 2004 and 2008, medical records of 247 patients who underwent TURP in Adana Numune Training and Research hospital were examined, retrospectively. Patients who had a histological diagnosis of only BPH were considered in Group 1 whereas Group 2 consisted of patients with both NIH-IV CP and BPH simultaneously. Factors such as total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) levels, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), single-question quality of life (QoL) assessments, maximum flow rates (Q max), residual urine volumes, catheterization times, re-catheterization rates, and the duration of re-catheterization were compared between these 2 groups. IPSS, QoL, and uroflowmetry measurements were compared between the 2 groups again at the third post-operative month. Statistical analysis with Student&#8217;s t and chi-square tests was performed with SPSS ® version 16. Results: Preoperatively, no statistically significant difference was present between the 2 groups with respect to IPSS, Q max, QoL, prostate volume, tPSA, and mean catheterization time (P > 0.05); however, re-catheterization rates were significantly different (P < 0.05). While meaningful difference was found between 90th day IPSS and QoL medians (P < 0.05), there was no difference in Q max medians (P > 0.05). Conclusion: NIH-IV chronic prostatitis shows negative effects on the subjective post-operative results and re-catheterization frequency of BPH patients that have undergone TURP.

Özet

Transurethral prostate resection (TURP) is still considered the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Category IV chronic prostatitis (CP) is described by the National Institute of Health (NIH-IV) as the asymptomatic inflammation of the prostate and it may be detected along with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) during histological examinations of the prostate. In this study, we evaluate the impact of the presence of NIH-IV defined prostatitis on early post-operative outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate. Materials and methods: Between 2004 and 2008, medical records of 247 patients who underwent TURP in Adana Numune Training and Research hospital were examined, retrospectively. Patients who had a histological diagnosis of only BPH were considered in Group 1 whereas Group 2 consisted of patients with both NIH-IV CP and BPH simultaneously. Factors such as total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) levels, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), single-question quality of life (QoL) assessments, maximum flow rates (Q max), residual urine volumes, catheterization times, re-catheterization rates, and the duration of re-catheterization were compared between these 2 groups. IPSS, QoL, and uroflowmetry measurements were compared between the 2 groups again at the third post-operative month. Statistical analysis with Student&#8217;s t and chi-square tests was performed with SPSS ® version 16. Results: Preoperatively, no statistically significant difference was present between the 2 groups with respect to IPSS, Q max, QoL, prostate volume, tPSA, and mean catheterization time (P > 0.05); however, re-catheterization rates were significantly different (P < 0.05). While meaningful difference was found between 90th day IPSS and QoL medians (P < 0.05), there was no difference in Q max medians (P > 0.05). Conclusion: NIH-IV chronic prostatitis shows negative effects on the subjective post-operative results and re-catheterization frequency of BPH patients that have undergone TURP.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINKAYA, F. R., GÖKÇE, A., DAVARCI, M., GÜVEN, E. O., İNCİ, M., KARTAL, S. B. (2011). The impact of NIH-IV prostatitis on early post-operative outcomes of The impact of NIH-IV prostatitis on early post-operative outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 515–519. https://ajindex.com/articles/723593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Nickel JC. Th e overlapping lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis. Curr Opin Urol 2006; 16: 5-10.
  2. Emberton M, Cornel EB, Bassi PF, Fourcade RO, Gómez JM, Castro R. Benign prostatic hyperplasia as a progressive disease: a guide to the risk factors and options for medical management. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 1076-86.
  3. Mishra VC, Allen DJ, Nicolaou C, Sharif H, Hudd C, Karim OM et al. Does intraprostatic infl ammation have a role in the pathogenesis and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia? BJU Int 2007; 100: 327-31.
  4. Kramer G, Marberger M. Could infl ammation be a key component in the progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia? Curr Opin Urol 2006; 16: 25-9.
  5. Krieger JN, Nyberg L Jr, Nickel JC. NIH consensus defi nition and classifi cation of prostatitis. JAMA 1999; 282: 236-7.
  6. Di Silverio F, Gentile V, De Matteis A, Mariotti G, Giuseppe V, Luigi PA et al. Distribution of infl ammation, pre-malignant lesions, incidental carcinoma in histological confi rmed benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective analysis. Eur Urol. 2003; 43: 164-75.
  7. Kohnen PW, Drach GW. Patterns of infl ammation in prostatic hyperplasia: a histologic and bacteriologic study. J Urol 1979; 121: 755-60.
  8. Tunuguntla HS, Evans CP. Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. 2002; 20: 197-206.
  9. Zlotta AR, Djavan B. Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the new millennium: long-term data. Curr Opin Urol 2002; 12: 7-14.
  10. Stancik I, Lüft enegger W, Klimpfi nger M, Müller MM, Hoeltl W. Eff ect of NIH-IV prostatitis on free and free-to-total PSA. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 760-4.
  11. Madersbacher S, Marberger M. Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justifi ed? BJU Int 1999; 83: 227-37.
  12. Fibbi B, Penna G, Morelli A, Adorini L, Maggi M. Chronic infl ammation in the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Androl 2010; 1; 33: 475-88. Nickel JC. Infl ammation and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am 2008; 35: 109-15. Kirby RS. Th e natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia: what have we learned in the last decade? Urology 2000; 56: 3-6.
  13. Arrighi HM, Guess HA, Metter EJ, Fozard JL. Symptoms and signs of prostatism as risk factors for prostatectomy. Prostate 1990; 16: 253-61.
  14. Girman CJ, Panser LA, Chute CG, Oesterling JE, Barrett DM, Chen CC et al. Natural history of prostatism: urinary fl ow rates in a community-based study. J Urol 1993; 150: 887-92.
  15. Reich O, Gratzke C, Sti