SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

The Role of Inflammatory Markers in the Diagnosis of Extraperitoneal Endometriosis

Selim GÜLÜCÜ
Neşet GÜMÜŞBURUN
Pages
1004–1007
Publication Date
2022-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS: The study included 28 patients and it was found that the mean age of the patients was 32.67±5.56 years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT OBJECTİVE: This study was concerned with the examination of patients who underwent surgery for subcutaneous endometriosis in our clinic and the relationship between subcutaneous endometriosis and inflammatory markers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Laboratory analysis recorded TSH, blood count (Hb), WBC, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/platelet ratio (MPR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and CA -125 values of patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS: The study included 28 patients and it was found that the mean age of the patients was 32.67±5.56 years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Endometriosis · scar line · episiotomy line

Abstract

ABSTRACT OBJECTİVE: This study was concerned with the examination of patients who underwent surgery for subcutaneous endometriosis in our clinic and the relationship between subcutaneous endometriosis and inflammatory markers. MATERİALS AND METHODS: Patient demographics and information on history and duration of previous surgery, lesion size, number of lesions, location, recurrence, symptoms, type and number of deliveries, recurrence status, and imaging method were recorded. Laboratory analysis recorded TSH, blood count (Hb), WBC, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/platelet ratio (MPR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and CA -125 values of patients. RESULTS: The study included 28 patients and it was found that the mean age of the patients was 32.67±5.56 years. Five (17.9%) and 18 (64.3%) of the patients complained of a palpable mass and cyclic pain, respectively. Five patients (17.9%) were asymptomatic. Endometriosis associated with the scar line was localized in 18 (64.3%) of the patients. In three (10.7%) of the patients, the endometriosis was localized in the perineal line and in 7 (25%) of the patients in the rectus abdominis. No significant difference was found in the patients' routine laboratory results and inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: In the present study, there was no significant association between the levels of inflammatory markers in patients who underwent surgery for subcutaneous endometriosis at different sites and with different symptoms.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLÜCÜ, S., GÜMÜŞBURUN, N. (2022). The Role of Inflammatory Markers in the Diagnosis of Extraperitoneal Endometriosis. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 1004–1007. https://ajindex.com/articles/886756

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. de Almeida GJ, Migliore R, Kistenmacker FJN, Oliveira MM, Garcia RB, Bin FC, et al. Malignant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis to clear cell carcinoma: case report. Sao Paulo Med J 2018; 136: 586-90
  2. Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Wattiez A, Zupi E, Gomel V. Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, and Outcomes for Abdominal Wall Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25: 342-3
  3. Nominato NS, Prates LF, Lauar I, Morais J, Maia L, Geber S. Caesarean section greatly increases risk of scar endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 152: 83-5
  4. Mistrangelo M, Gilbo N, Cassoni P, Micalef S, Faletti R, Miglietta C, et al. Surgical scar endometriosis. Surg Today 2014; 44(4): 767-72
  5. Grigore M, Socolov D, Pavaleanu I, Scripcariu I, Grigore AM, Micu R. Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in clinical, imagistic features, and management options. Med Ultrason 2017; 19: 430-7
  6. Maillard C, Cherif Alami Z, Squifflet JL, Luyckx M, Jadoul P, Thomas V, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Vulvo-Perineal Endometriosis: A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2021;8:637180
  7. Tatli F, Gozeneli O, Uyanikoglu H, et al. The clinical characteristics and surgical approach of scar endometriosis: A case series of 14 women. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2018; 18: 275-8
  8. Sumathy S, Mangalakanthi J, Purushothaman K, et al. Symptomatology and Surgical Perspective of Scar Endometriosis: A Case Series of 16 Women. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2017; 67: 218-23
  9. Youssef AT. The ultrasound of subcutaneous extrapelvic endometriosis. J Ultrason. 2020; 20(82): 176-80 10- Medeiros F, Cavalcante DI, Medeiros MA, Eleuterio J, Jr. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of scar endometriosis: study of seven cases and literatüre review. Diagn Cytopathol 2011; 39(1): 18-21 11- Corrêa G, Pina L, Korkes H, Guazzelli T, Kenj G, Toledo A. Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical icisions: retrospective study on 33 cases and review of literature. Sao Paulo Med J 2009; 127(5): 270–7
  10. Andres MP, Arcoverde FVL, Souza CCC, Fernandes LFC, Abrão MS, Kho RM. Extrapelvic Endometriosis: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27(2): 373-89
  11. Yela DA, Trigo L, Benetti-Pinto CL. Evaluation of cases of abdominal wall endometriosis at Universidade Estadual de Campinas in a period of 10 years. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39: 403-7
  12. Fest J, Ruiter R, Ikram MA, Voortman T, van Eijck CHJ, Stricker BH. Reference values for white blood-cell-based inflammatory markers in the Rotte