Journals / International Journal of Secondary Metabolite / 2023 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of genetic diversity based on agro-morphological traits and ISSR molecular markers in einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum) landrace populations from Turkey

Pages
86–105
Publication Date
2023-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the use of morphological characters alone for genetic diversity in populations is not sufficient to determine the difference between populations and their genetic structure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate genetic diversity in 48 einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum) landraces grown in agricultural areas of Bolu and Kastamonu.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The highest coefficient of variation (%) was observed in fresh root weight (FRW = 52.09%), while the lowest was in leaf weight (LW = 8.9%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the use of morphological characters alone for genetic diversity in populations is not sufficient to determine the difference between populations and their genetic structure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Agro-Morphological traits · Einkorn Wheat · Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate genetic diversity in 48 einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum) landraces grown in agricultural areas of Bolu and Kastamonu. Therefore, variation in seven agro-morphological traits was investigated. Agro-morphological traits such as leaf weight (mg), coleoptile length (cm), root number (n), root length (cm), fresh root weight (mg), and dry root weight (mg) were examined by the coefficient of variation, ANOVA, and principal components analysis. The highest coefficient of variation (%) was observed in fresh root weight (FRW = 52.09%), while the lowest was in leaf weight (LW = 8.9%). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was calculated as 76.93% variation in two main components. For molecular characterization, data obtained with iSSR primers were analyzed with the population genetics analysis program PopGene (ver. 1.32). According to PopGene results, the mean number of alleles, the mean number of effective alleles, and average genetic diversity values were calculated as na = 2, nea = 1.33, and h = 0.13, respectively. Among the agro-morphological traits, germination power, root number, and coleoptile length appeared to be reliable traits. The results show that the use of morphological characters alone for genetic diversity in populations is not sufficient to determine the difference between populations and their genetic structure.

Özet

The aim of this study is to investigate genetic diversity in 48 einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. ssp. monococcum) landraces grown in agricultural areas of Bolu and Kastamonu. Therefore, variation in seven agro-morphological traits was investigated. Agro-morphological traits such as leaf weight (mg), coleoptile length (cm), root number (n), root length (cm), fresh root weight (mg), and dry root weight (mg) were examined by the coefficient of variation, ANOVA, and principal components analysis. The highest coefficient of variation (%) was observed in fresh root weight (FRW = 52.09%), while the lowest was in leaf weight (LW = 8.9%). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was calculated as 76.93% variation in two main components. For molecular characterization, data obtained with iSSR primers were analyzed with the population genetics analysis program PopGene (ver. 1.32). According to PopGene results, the mean number of alleles, the mean number of effective alleles, and average genetic diversity values were calculated as na = 2, nea = 1.33, and h = 0.13, respectively. Among the agro-morphological traits, germination power, root number, and coleoptile length appeared to be reliable traits. The results show that the use of morphological characters alone for genetic diversity in populations is not sufficient to determine the difference between populations and their genetic structure.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZOMMİTA, S., YILDIZ, G. G., ZENCİRCİ, N., ÖZBEK, Ö., ÜNÜVAR, Ö. C., ÜNLÜ, E. S. (2023). Assessment of genetic diversity based on agro-morphological traits and ISSR molecular markers in einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum) landrace populations from Turkey. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 86–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/886501

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abdel-Aal, E.-S.M., Hucl, P., Sosulski, F.W., & Bhirud, P.R. (1997).
  2. Kernel, Milling and Baking Properties of Spring-Type Spelt and Einkorn Wheats. Journal of Cereal Science, 26(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1997.0139
  3. Aslan, D., Ordu, B., Göre, M.E., Akin, B., & Zencirci, N. (2018). Germination Stage Water Scarcity in Bread and Einkorn Wheat. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.436371
  4. Bavec, F., & Bavec, M. (2006). Organic Production and Use of Alternative Crops. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420017427
  5. Butnaru, G., Sarac, I., Blidar, A., Holly, L., & Mar, I. (2003). Morpho-Agronomic variability of Triticum monococcum L. land races in the Timisoara area. In VIIth International Symposium Interdisciplinary Regional Research-ISIRR 2003 Hungary–Serbia & Montenegro–Romania, 359. http://annals.fih.upt.ro/pdf/ISIRR-2003-S04.pdf#page=65
  6. Castagna, R., Borghi, B., Di Fonzo, N., Heun, M., & Salamini, F. (1995). Yield and related traits of einkorn (T. monococcum ssp. monococcum) in different environments. European Journal of Agronomy, 4(3), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1161-0301(14)80038-5
  7. Desheva, G.N., Kyosev, B., & Deshev, M. (2020). Assessment genetic diversity of einkorn genotypes (Triticum monococcum L.) by gliadin electrophoresis. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 116(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.116.2.1430
  8. Empilli, S., Castagna, R., & Brandolini, A. (2000). Morpho-agronomic variability of the diploid wheat Triticum monococcum L. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 36–40. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=en&lr=&id= EugPlBNki4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA36&dq=Empilli,+S.,+Castagna,+R.,+%26+Brandolini,+A.+(2000).+Morpho agronomic+variability+of+the+diploid+wheat+Triticum+monococcum+L.+Plant+Genetic+Resources+Newsletter,+36%E2%80%9340.&ots=hWbD1reYGO&sig=V_kafSG9wZI8iZFZ56vtW636rK0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false Eslami Farouji, A., Khodayari, H., Saeidi, H., & Rahiminejad, M.R. (2015). Genetic diversity of diploid Triticum species in Iran assessed using inter-retroelement amplified polymorphisms (IRAP) markers. Biologia, 70(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0002
  9. Fritsch, R., Hammer, K., & Szabo, A.T. (1996). [Ethnobiodiversity: human diversity and plant genetic diversity in the evolution of crop plants. Part 1].[English); De (German]. Schriftenreihe Des Information SzentrumsfuerGenetischeRessourcen (Germany), 4. Goto, F., Tsutsumi, T., & Ogawa, K. (2011). The Japanese v