Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation / 2023 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Risk Analysis of Natech Accidents Trigged by Lightnings and Floods

Pages
30–52
Publication Date
2023-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is important that emergency plans be prepared by considering the Natech risks, based on the characteristics of the industrial facility and the type of natural disaster in the region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Natural Hazard Triggered Technical Accidents (Natech) cause serious loss of life, environment and property and affect life negatively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of these evaluations, two exemplary gas storage organizations (Organization 1: includes 5 cylindrical tanks of the same volume, Organization 2: includes 4 cylindrical tanks of the same volume and 1 large volume spherical tank) were selected within the scope of the legislation in Erzurum, which stands out in terms of flood and lightning risk.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is important that emergency plans be prepared by considering the Natech risks, based on the characteristics of the industrial facility and the type of natural disaster in the region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Natech Acidents · Risk Analysis · Lightning

Abstract

Natural Hazard Triggered Technical Accidents (Natech) cause serious loss of life, environment and property and affect life negatively. Risk analysis studies of these accidents are important. In this study, it was aimed to analyze the risk of Natech accidents for Türkiye. Statistical evaluation of Natech accidents was made through various databases for selecting the province and organization where the application will be made. Because of these evaluations, two exemplary gas storage organizations (Organization 1: includes 5 cylindrical tanks of the same volume, Organization 2: includes 4 cylindrical tanks of the same volume and 1 large volume spherical tank) were selected within the scope of the legislation in Erzurum, which stands out in terms of flood and lightning risk. Flood-triggered Natech accidents were analyzed using the preliminary hazard list and Fine-Kinney methods, and lightning-triggered Natech accidents were analyzed through the YILKOMER and RADSAN programs. For Organization 1 and Organization 2, the protection level was determined as 3 and 4, respectively, according to the effectiveness value. While 34 hazard effects were graded with the preliminary hazard list for Organization 1 and 22 hazard effects by Fine-Kinney; for Organization 2, hazard effects were graded 37 with the preliminary hazard list and 28 with Fine-Kinney. Because of the analyses carried out, Organization 2 was found to be more risky in terms of Natech accidents triggered by both lightning and flooding. It can be said that this situation is because the relevant organization is located in a more congested area and within the organized industry, and that it contains more voluminous tanks. It is important that emergency plans be prepared by considering the Natech risks, based on the characteristics of the industrial facility and the type of natural disaster in the region.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURT, M. M., ÇETİNYOKUŞ, S. (2023). Risk Analysis of Natech Accidents Trigged by Lightnings and Floods. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 30–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/886020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Acikgoz, V. (2012). Modeling of fire and explosion situations in LPG storage tanks. MSc Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul, Türkiye. Caratozzolo, V., Misuri, A., & Cozzani, V. (2022). A generalized equipment vulnerability model for the quantitative risk assessment of horizontal vessels involved in Natech scenarios triggered by floods. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 223, 108504. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108504 Çetinyokuş, S. (2018). Consequences Modeling of the Akcagaz Accident through Land Use Planning (LUP) Approach. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering-International English Edition, 37(4), 253-264. doi:10.30492/ijcce.2018.35109 Demirdöğen, M. M., & Çetinyokuş, S. (2021). Risk Assessment in a Ready-Mixed Concrete Plant Located in an Earthquake Zone. OHS Academic, 3(1), 79-98. eNatech Database. (2022). (Accessed: 14/12/2022) https://enatech.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
  2. Girgin, S., & Krausmann, E. (2016). Historical analysis of U.S. onshore hazardous liquid pipeline accidents triggered by natural hazards. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 40, 578-590. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.008 Girgin, S., Necci, A & Krausmann, E. (2019). Dealing with cascading multi-hazard risks in national risk assessment: The case of Natech accidents. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 35, 101072. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101072 Güneş, Y., & Çetinyokuş, S. (2020). The Problem of Land Use Planning (LUP) for Industrial Accidents in Turkey. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, 10(2), 226-248. doi:10.14230/johut768 HGM, General Directorate of Mapping. (2022). Physical Map of Erzurum City. (Accessed: 22/03/2022) https://www.harita.gov.tr/urun/erzurum-fiziki-il-haritasi/410
  3. Krausmann, E., & Musthaq, F. (2008). A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities. Natural Hazards, 46, 179-197. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9203-5
  4. Kurt, M. M., & Çetinyokuş, S. (2021, December 17-18). Risk Analysis of Technological Accidents Triggered by Natural Disasters. In: B. Topuz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific Research Congress - Science and Engineering (UBAK 2021), (pp. 48-59).
  5. Ankara,
  6. Turkiye. Landucci, G., Necci, A., Antonioni, G., Tugnoli, A., & Cozzani, V. (2014). Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 132, 125-145. doi:10.1016/j.ress.20