SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

How Does Deglobalization Affect Economic Growth?

Küreselleşmeden Uzaklaşma Ekonomik Büyümeyi Nasıl Etkiler?

Deniz SEVİNÇ
Alp POLAT
Tuba SEVİL
Güven SEVİL
Pages
1–19
Publication Date
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using panel data analysis, the results indicate that trade and social deglobalization have a negative impact on economic growth, while financial deglobalization and the subdimensions of social deglobalization have a positive influence on growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current global landscape has been marked by a series of factors, such as the US-China trade war, disintegration in the European Union (EU), the refugee crisis, and the pandemic, which have impeded the process of globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the present study aims to investigate the effects of deglobalization on economic growth in 34 OECD countries during the period 2000-2019, in various dimensions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using panel data analysis, the results indicate that trade and social deglobalization have a negative impact on economic growth, while financial deglobalization and the subdimensions of social deglobalization have a positive influence on growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Küreselleşmeden Uzaklaşma · KOF Endeksi · Ekonomik Büyüme

Abstract

The current global landscape has been marked by a series of factors, such as the US-China trade war, disintegration in the European Union (EU), the refugee crisis, and the pandemic, which have impeded the process of globalization. However, similar situations have been experienced in the past, such as colonization, the Great Depression, and the Cold War. The world has experienced periods of globalization (Globalization I, II, and III) as well as periods of deglobalization (Deglobalization I and II). There have been discussions about whether the current decade is experiencing deglobalization and its effects. In this context, the present study aims to investigate the effects of deglobalization on economic growth in 34 OECD countries during the period 2000-2019, in various dimensions. Using panel data analysis, the results indicate that trade and social deglobalization have a negative impact on economic growth, while financial deglobalization and the subdimensions of social deglobalization have a positive influence on growth. Additionally, the study reveals that political globalization is not significantly associated with economic growth. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the current state of globalization and its effects on economic development.

Özet

Mevcut küresel düzen, ABD-Çin ticaret savaşı, Avrupa Birliği’ndeki dağılma, mülteci krizi ve son olarak pandemi gibi bir dizi faktör ile küreselleşme sürecinin yavaşladığını göstermektedir. Ancak bu durum geçmişte de yaşanmıştır (örneğin sömürgeleştirme, Büyük Buhran, Soğuk Savaş). Dünya bazı dönemlerde küreselleşirken (Küreselleşme I, II ve III), bazı dönemlerde küreselleşmeden uzaklaşmıştır (Küreselleşmeden Uzaklaşma I ve II). İçinde bulunduğumuz on yılın küreselleşmeden çıkıp çıkmadığı ve bunun etkileri üzerine tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Bu argümanlar ışığında bu çalışma, 2000-2019 dönemi için 34 OECD ülkesinde küreselleşmeden uzaklaşmanın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini çeşitli boyutlarıyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Panel veri analizi sonuçları, ticari ve sosyal küreselleşmeden uzaklaşmanın ekonomik büyümeyi olumsuz yönde etkilediğini, finansal küreselleşmeden uzaklaşmanın ve sosyal küreselleşmeden uzaklaşmanın alt boyutlarının ise olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Ek olarak, çalışma, politik küreselleşmenin ekonomik büyüme ile anlamlı bir şekilde ilişkili olmadığını ortaya koymakta ve ulaşılan bulgular, küreselleşmenin mevcut durumu ve bunun ekonomik kalkınma üzerindeki etkileri hakkında devam eden tartışmalara katkıda bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVİNÇ, D., POLAT, A., SEVİL, T., SEVİL, G. (2023). How Does Deglobalization Affect Economic Growth?. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/885736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abakumova, J. and Primierova, O. (2018). Globalization, growth and inequality: Testing causality and asymmetries. Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 12(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.26552/ems.2018.2.83-95
  2. Alesina, A., Spolaore, E. and Wacziarg, R. (2000). Economic integration and political disintegration. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1276–1296. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.90.5.1276
  3. Amini, S., Delgado, M.S., Henderson, D.J. and Parmeter, C.F. (2012). Fixed vs random: The Hausman test four decades later. Advances in Econometrics, 29, 479–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-9053(2012)0000029021
  4. Apergis, N. and Poufinas, T. (2020). The role of insurance growth in economic growth: Fresh evidence from a panel of OECD countries. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 53, 101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NAJEF.2020.101217
  5. Barone, B. and Bendini, R. (2015). Protectionism in the G20. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/549028/EXPO_STU(2015)549028_EN.pdf
  6. Bataka, H. (2019).
  7. De jure, De facto globalization and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economic Integration, 34(1), 133–158. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/
  8. Bell, A. and Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/PSRM.2014.7
  9. Bello, W. (2004). Deglobalization: Ideas for a new world economy. London: Zed Books. Chang, C.P. and Lee, C.C. (2010). Globalization and economic growth: A political economy analysis for OECD countries. Perspectives on East Asian Economies and Industries, 39(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2010.483835
  10. Choi, W.J. and Pyun, J.H. (2019). Catching up by deglobalization: Capital account policy and economic growth (SSRN Working Paper No. 3516385). https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3516385
  11. Clemens, M.A. and Williamson, J.G. (2004). Why did the tariff-growth correlation change after 1950? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(1), 5–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000023015.44856.a9
  12. Dollar, D. (2005). Globalization, poverty, and inequality since 1980. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(2), 145-175. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lki008
  13. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
  14. Fischer, S. (1998). Capital account liberalization and the role of the