SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

THE ROLE OF PRESSURE GROUPS IN CONTEXTUALIZING FLEXIBLE EMPLOYMENT: AN ANALYSIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE SCHUMPETERIAN WORKFARE STATE

ESNEK İSTİHDAMIN BAĞLAMSALLAŞTIRILMASINDA BASKI GRUPLARININ ROLÜ: SCHUMPETERYEN ÇALIŞMA DEVLETİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE BİR ÇÖZÜMLEME

Salih ARSLAN
Ragıp YILMAZ
Pages
535–558
Publication Date
2023-03-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, social consent was tried to be achieved by ignoring the potential adverse effects of the flexible employment model on factors such as unemployment, wages, job security, and employee identity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study analyzes the contextualizing role of the Turkish Industrialists' and Businessmen's Association (TUSIAD) as a pressure group in establishing flexible labor markets supported by the Schumpeterian Workfare State (SWS) in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The discourses of TUSIAD on flexible employment in its reports were chosen as the analysis material, and the data were analyzed with the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, social consent was tried to be achieved by ignoring the potential adverse effects of the flexible employment model on factors such as unemployment, wages, job security, and employee identity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Schumpeteryen Çalışma Devleti · Esnek İstihdam · Baskı Grupları

Abstract

The study analyzes the contextualizing role of the Turkish Industrialists' and Businessmen's Association (TUSIAD) as a pressure group in establishing flexible labor markets supported by the Schumpeterian Workfare State (SWS) in Turkey. The discourses of TUSIAD on flexible employment in its reports were chosen as the analysis material, and the data were analyzed with the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method. As a result of the analysis, it has been determined that flexible employment is tried to be accepted as an inevitable model by asserting universal reasons such as technological development, global competition, privatization of production, and local reasons such as unemployment and informal work. In the discourses, new working styles and employee identities are presented as a natural result, and it is emphasized that the education system should be organized according to this new structure. However, social consent was tried to be achieved by ignoring the potential adverse effects of the flexible employment model on factors such as unemployment, wages, job security, and employee identity.

Özet

Çalışma Schumpeteryen Çalışma Devleti (SÇD) sisteminin öngördüğü esnek emek piyasalarının Türkiye’de yerleştirilmesi sürecinde baskı grubu olarak Türkiye Sanayici ve İş Adamları Derneği’nin (TÜSİAD) bağlamsallaştırıcı rolünü incelemektedir. Analiz materyali olarak TÜSİAD raporlarındaki esnek istihdam üzerine söylemler seçilmiş ve veriler Eleştirel Söylem Analizi (ESA) yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Çözümleme sonucunda teknolojik gelişme, küresel rekabet, üretimin özelleşmesi gibi evrensel gerekçeler ile işsizlik ve kayıt dışı çalışma gibi yerel gerekçeler öne sürülerek esnek istihdamın kaçınılmaz bir model olarak gösterilmeye çalışıldığı bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Söylemlerde yeni çalışma biçimleri ve çalışan kimlikleri doğal bir sonuç olarak sunulmakta, eğitim sisteminin bu yeni işleyişe göre düzenlemesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Ancak esnek istihdam modelinin işsizlik, ücret, iş güvencesi, çalışan kimliği gibi unsurlar üzerindeki potansiyel olumsuz etkileri göz ardı edilerek toplumsal rıza sağlanmaya çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, S., YILMAZ, R. (2023). THE ROLE OF PRESSURE GROUPS IN CONTEXTUALIZING FLEXIBLE EMPLOYMENT: AN ANALYSIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE SCHUMPETERIAN WORKFARE STATE. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 535–558. https://ajindex.com/articles/884821

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Andrews, D. M. (1994). Capital mobility and state autonomy: Toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 193-218.
  2. Arrighi, G. (1990). The three hegemonies of capitalism. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 13(3), 365-408.
  3. Bal, P.M., & Izhak, M. (2021). Paradigms of flexibility: A systematic review of research on workplace flexibility. European Management Review, 18, 37-50
  4. Bayramoğlu, S. (2010). Yönetişim Zihniyeti Türkiye'de Üst Kurullar ve Siyasal İktidarın Dönüşümü. İstanbul:
  5. İletişim. Bertsou, E., & Caramani, D. (2020). People haven't had enough of experts: Technocratic attitudes among citizens in nine European democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 1-19.
  6. Bhagwati, J. N. (2009). Küreselleşme ve Uygun Yönetişim. (Çev: F. İsmihan). F. Şenses (Ed), Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma Seçme Yazılar içinde, (s. 573-615), İstanbul:
  7. İletişim. Bickerton, C., & Accetti, C. I. (2017). Populism and technocracy: Opposites or complements? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(2), 186-206.
  8. Boyer, R. (2013). The present crisis: A trump for a renewed political economy. Review of Political Eonomy, 25(1), 1-38.
  9. Centeno, M. A. (1993). The new leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22(3), 307-335.
  10. Castells, M. (2010). The information age: Economy, society and culture. V.1 (The rise of the network society). Wiley-Blackwell. Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2010). Global capitalism: A sociological perspective. Polity Press.
  11. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251-274.
  12. Chang, H.J. (2009). Merdiveni Tekmelemek: Tarihi Bir Perspektif İçinde "İyi Politikalar" ve "İyi Kurumlar". (Çev: N. D. Güngör). F. Şenses (Ed). Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma Seçme Yazılar içinde (s. 89-122), İstanbul:
  13. İletişim. Christensen, J., & Mandelkern, R. (2021). The technocratic tendencies of economists in government bureaucracy. Governance, 1-25.
  14. Chwieroth, J. (2007). Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International Organization, 61(2), 443-463.
  15. Emini, F. T. (2013). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarının politika belirleme sürecindeki rolü: TÜSİAD örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 36, 43-56.
  16. Erbuğ, E. (2021). Özel alanda erkekliğin yeniden inşasını anlamak: Home office çalışan erkekler. Moment Dergi, 8(1), 25-46. Ercan,