Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2023 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

SECTORAL GROWTH DYNAMICS OF COUNTRY GROUPS: A COUNTRY GROUPING SUGGESTION

Pages
25–44
Publication Date
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, another critical suggestion it is offered based on the study is the use of FGP methodology in the analysis method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- In the study, the effects of sectors on the growth of OECD member countries were determined by using the Fuzzy Goal Programming method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings- Countries analyzed in terms of the contribution of sectoral growth rates to the growth rate of the country were divided into groups by cluster analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, another critical suggestion it is offered based on the study is the use of FGP methodology in the analysis method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Economic growth · sectoral growth · Fuzzy Goal Programming

Abstract

Purpose- In the study, the effects of sectors on the growth of OECD member countries were determined by using the Fuzzy Goal Programming method. These findings may help policymakers see sector impacts that help countries in their growth targets. The study aims to contribute to the literature in two ways. The first of these analyses are based on long-term economic growth and primary sector analysis. The second contribution is to propose an alternative empirical methodology with clustering analysis which is not used to obtain the basic assumption of homogeneity in the application of panel data analysis. Methodology- The effects of sectors on the growth of OECD member countries were determined by using the Fuzzy Goal Programming method. In the second step, countries were divided into groups using K-means clustering analysis according to these impact values. With the help of these weights, the growth dynamics of similar countries and the contributions of sectors to this dynamic were obtained. Findings- Countries analyzed in terms of the contribution of sectoral growth rates to the growth rate of the country were divided into groups by cluster analysis. It is determined that the countries grouped in terms of the contribution of sectors to growth are divided into 5 groups. The first group has 10 member countries. The second group has 12 countries and the third group it has 7 countries, the fourth group has 4 countries and only 1 country belongs to the fifth group. The countries in group 1 are Estonia, Turkey, Greece, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The countries in group 2 are Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Hungary, Ireland, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and New Zealand. The countries in group 3 are Austria, Spain, Finland, France, the Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, Switzerland, the USA, Israel, Costa Rica, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Conclusion- Countries that have similar sectoral structures can analyze growth with panel data analysis, but it is important to form homogeneous groups while doing this analysis. For this reason, another critical suggestion it is offered based on the study is the use of FGP methodology in the analysis method.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALP, S., ALP, E. A., OZKAN, T. K., ERDOGAN, M. F. (2023). SECTORAL GROWTH DYNAMICS OF COUNTRY GROUPS: A COUNTRY GROUPING SUGGESTION. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 25–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/883495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2002). Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica, 70, 191-221.
  2. Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72, 1127-1177.
  3. Bhattacharya, B. B. and Mitra, A. (1989). Agriculture-industry growth rates: widening disparity: an explanation. Economic and Political Weekly, August 26. Bhattacharya, B. B. and Mitra, A. (1990). Excess growth of the tertiary sector: issues and implications. Economic and Political Weekly, November 3. Breitung, J. and Das, S. (2005). Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 59(4), 414-433.
  4. Canova, F. and Ciccarelli, M., (2013). Panel Vector Autoregressive models: A survey. European Central Bank Working Paper, 1507-1518.
  5. Chakravarty, S., and Mitra, A. (2009). Is industry still the engine of growth? An econometric study of the organized sector employment in India. Journal of Policy Modelling, 31, 22–35. Charnes A., and Cooper, W.W. (1961). Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. New York, John Wiley. Charnes A., Cooper, W.W. and Ijiri, Y. (1963). Breakeven budgeting and programming to goals. Journal of Accounting Research, 1, 16-43.
  6. Charnes A., Cooper, W.W., Learner, D.B. and Snow, E.F. (1968) Application of goal programming model for media plannig. Management Science, 14, 431-436.
  7. Choi, I. (2002) Combination unit root tests for cross sectionally correlated panels. Mimeo, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 1-26.
  8. Clark C. (1940) The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: McMillan & Co.s. Courtney, J.F., Klastorin, T.D. and Ruefly, W. (1972) A Goal Programming Approach to Urban-Suburban Location Preferences. Management Science, 18(6), B258-B268. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–431.
  9. Forsyth, J.D. (1969). Utilization of goal programming in production and capital expenditure planning. CORS Journal, 7(2), 136-140.
  10. Gershuny J.J. and I.D. Miles (1983). The New Service Economy: The Transformation of Employment in Industrial Societies. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  11. Guris, S. (2018).
  12. Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi, Istanbul, Der Yay. Fisher A.G.B. (1939).
  13. Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Production. Economic Record 15: 24–38.
  14. Han, J. and Kamber, M. (2006).
  15. Data Mining Concepts and Techniques, San Francisco: Morgan Kauffmann Publ