SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Intelligence Differences across Years: A Trend Analysis

Bilge BAL SEZEREL
N. Nazlı ATEŞGÖZ
Nilgün KİRİŞÇİ
Pages
107–126
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, our findings reveal that there is a sharp decrease between 2020 and 2021.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Flynn effect which advocated that there was a rise in the IQ score was widely accepted by the relevant scientific community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to determine the trend of students' general, verbal, and visual intelligence scores in the last 6 years (2016-2021).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, our findings reveal that there is a sharp decrease between 2020 and 2021.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:intelligence · Flynn effect · anti-Flynn effect

Abstract

Flynn effect which advocated that there was a rise in the IQ score was widely accepted by the relevant scientific community. However, this effect has been reversed in recent years. In this study both Flynn and anti-Flynn effects were investigated. The purpose of this study is to determine the trend of students' general, verbal, and visual intelligence scores in the last 6 years (2016-2021). The participant of study included 2192 students who were first grade. To measure general, verbal, and visual intelligence of the participant, Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale (ASIS) was used. ASIS is the first intelligence test developed and standardized in Turkey. Participants’ mean of general, verbal, and visual intelligence scores in different years were compared by trend analysis. The research findings showed that there was a downward tendency in general, verbal, and visual scores between the years of 2016 to 2021. Moreover, our findings reveal that there is a sharp decrease between 2020 and 2021. Girls' GIQ, VIQ, and NIQ scores of 2021 showed a sharp decline compared to boys. As a result of this study, it can be said that the Flynn effect has gone into reversed.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZEREL, B. B., ATEŞGÖZ, N. N., KİRİŞÇİ, N. (2023). Intelligence Differences across Years: A Trend Analysis. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 107–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/879971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Azevedo, J. P., Hasan, A., Goldemberg, D., Geven, K., & Iqbal, S. A. (2021). Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: A set of global estimates. The World Bank Research Observer, 36(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab003
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
  3. Başaran, M., Doğan, E., Karaoğlu, E., & Şahin, E. (2020). Koronavirüs (covid-19) pandemi sürecinin getirisi olan uzaktan eğitimin etkililiği üzerine bir çalışma [A study on effectiveness of distance education, as a return of coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic process]. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 368-397.
  4. Bayburtlu, Y. S. (2020). Covid-19 pandemi dönemi uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğretmen görüşlerine göre Türkçe eğitimi [Turkish education during covid-19 pandemic distance education process]. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 131-151. https://doi.org/ 10.7827/TurkishStudies.44460 Bennett, D. J., & Warren, W. (2002). Size scaling: Retinal or environmental frame of reference? Perceptions & Psychophysics, 64(3), 462-477.
  5. Bordone, V., Scherbov, S., & Steiber, N. (2015). Smarter every day: The deceleration of population ageing in terms of cognition. Intelligence, 52, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.07.005
  6. Bratsberg, B., & Rogeberg, O. (2018). Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(26), 6674-6678. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718793115
  7. Cao W., Fang Z., Hou G., Han M., Xu X., Dong J., et al.(2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 287, 112934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934
  8. Cırık, M., Sak, U., & Öpengin, E. (2020). Dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğu olan çocukların Anadolu-Sak Zekâ Ölçeği profillerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of cognitive profiles of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder through Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 21(4), 663-685. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.570505
  9. Coller, R. J., & Webber, S. (2020). COVID-19 and the well-being of children and families. Pediatrics, 146(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-022079
  10. Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 20-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90003-1
  11. Daley, T. C., W