Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2023 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Digitalization of Public Financial Audit: A Review of Blockchain Technology

Kamu Mali Denetiminin Dijitalleşmesi: Blokzincir Teknolojisinin İncelenmesi

Pages
187–207
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The solution of such problems seen in many countries will contribute to the realization of positive results such as ensuring efficiency in the allocation of public resources, preventing corruption, strengthening accountability that determines the limits of authority and discretion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The way of using the current internet technology has some risks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Applications configured in a centralized structure can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, and personal errors can cause data significant problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The solution of such problems seen in many countries will contribute to the realization of positive results such as ensuring efficiency in the allocation of public resources, preventing corruption, strengthening accountability that determines the limits of authority and discretion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mali Denetim · Blokzincir Teknolojisi · Akıllı Sözleşmeler

Abstract

The way of using the current internet technology has some risks. Applications configured in a centralized structure can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, and personal errors can cause data significant problems. In this context, blockchain technology is considered to be a highly innovative development with its decentralized distributed registration method and its unique functioning process. The potential it holds that attracted the attention of government agencies, and some attempts have been made at limited level. In this context, the aim of the study is to explore how blockchain technology can be handled in public financial audit. Because corruption, abuse of public power, the lack of transparency of public accounts, and the administrative disruptions in the audit bring the solution of the issue to the agenda with innovative technologies. The solution of such problems seen in many countries will contribute to the realization of positive results such as ensuring efficiency in the allocation of public resources, preventing corruption, strengthening accountability that determines the limits of authority and discretion.

Özet

Mevcut internet teknolojisinin kullanım yöntemi bir takım riskler barındırmaktadır. Merkezi bir yapıda yapılandırılan uygulamalar siber saldırılara karşı savunmasız kalabilmektedir. Benzer şekilde bireysel hatalar da önemli veri sorunlarına yol açabilmektedir. Bu bağlamda blokzincir teknolojisi, merkezi olmayan dağıtık kayıt yöntemi ve kendine özgü işleyen süreci ile oldukça yenilikçi bir gelişme olarak kabul edilmektedir. Barındırdığı potansiyel, devlet kurumlarının da dikkatini çekmiş ve sınırlı düzeyde bazı girişimler yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı bu kapsamda blokzincir teknolojisinin kamu mali denetiminde nasıl ele alınabileceğinin araştırılmasıdır. Zira yolsuzluk, kamu gücünün kötüye kullanımı, kamu hesaplarının şeffaf olmaması ve denetimde meydana gelen aksaklıklar konunun yenilikçi teknolojilerle çözümünü gündeme getirmektedir. Birçok ülkede görülen bu tür sorunların çözümü ile kamu kaynakların tahsisatında etkinliğin sağlanması, yolsuzlukların önlenmesi, yetki ve takdir sınırlarını belirleyen hesap verilebilirliğin güçlendirilmesi gibi olumlu sonuçların doğumuna katkı sağlanacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, A. (2023). Digitalization of Public Financial Audit: A Review of Blockchain Technology. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 187–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/879464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ALEXOPOULOS, C., CHARALABIDIS, Y., ANDROUTSOPOULOU, A., LOUTSARIS, M. A., & LACHANA, Z. (2019). “Benefits and Obstacles of Blockchain Applications in E-Government”, Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3377-338,. 8 January 2019-11 January 2019,
  2. Grand Wailea, Hawaii. ALLESSIE, D., SOBOLEWSKI, M., & VACCARI, L. (2019).
  3. Blockchain for Digital Government, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ALTUNDİŞ, M. (2008). “Hukuki Güvenlik İlkesi”, Yasama Dergisi, 10: 60-94.
  4. ANTIPOVA, T. (2018). “Using Blockchain Technology for Government Auditing”, 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1-6. doi: 10.23919/CISTI.2018.8399439, 20.10.2021.
  5. ARUN, J. S., CUOMO, J., & GAUR, N. (2019).
  6. Blockchain for Business, Addison-Wesley, New York. ATZORI, M. (2015). “Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?”, SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2709713, 30.10.2021.
  7. BAMBARA, J., & R. ALLEN, P. R. (2018). Blockchain: A Practical Guide to Developing Business, Law, and Technology Solutions, Mcgraw-Hill Education, Chicago. BECK, R. (2018). “Beyond Bitcoin: The Rise of Blockchain World”, Computer, 51(2): 54-58.
  8. BITFURY. (2016). “The Bitfury Group and Government of Republic of Georgia Expand Historic Blockchain Land-Titling Project”, https://bitfury.com/content/downloads/the_bitfury_group_republic_of_georgia_expand_blockchain_pilot_2_7_16.pdf, 22.11.2021.
  9. BUTERIN, V. (2014). “A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform”, White Paper, 3(37): 1-35.
  10. CAI, Y., & ZHU, D. (2016). “Fraud Detections for Online Businesses: A Perspective from Blockchain Technology”, Financial Innovation, 2(20): 1-10.
  11. CASEY, M. J., & VIGNA, P. (2018). The Truth Machine: The Blockchain and the Future of Everything, St. Martin’s Press,
  12. New York. CİĞERCİ, İ., & EĞMİR, R. T. (2019) “Kamu Mali Denetiminde Olası Blok Zincir Teknolojisinin Denetim Etkinliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi” Maliye Dergisi, 177: 203-217.
  13. CORRALES, M., FENWICK, M., & HAAPIO, H. (2019). “Digital Technologies, Legal Design and the Future of the Legal Profession”, M. Corrales, M. Fenwick & H. Haapio (eds.), Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain (1-17),
  14. Springer, Singapore. ÇAPTUĞ, M. (2021). “Hukuki Güvenlik İlkesinin Kavramsal Gelişimi”, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, 17: 133-160.
  15. EL IONI, N., & PAHL, C. (2018). “A Review of Distributed Ledger Technologies”, OTM Confederated