Journals / GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The effects of physical environment in Ottoman healthcare facilities: 2nd Beyazid Complex in Edirne

Osmanlı sağlık yapılarında fiziksel çevre koşullarının etkileri: Edirne 2. Beyazit Külliyesi

Pages
254–284
Publication Date
2023-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that five hundred years ago, the building was compatible with its physical environmental data in terms of its function, planning, and building envelope, and, as being a museum today, it provides all the necessary comfort conditions for its users, and that the energy consumption is at an acceptable level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Healthcare facilities have an important place in Ottoman Architecture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most of them are used by serving as exhibition and museum buildings like Edirne Sultan 2nd Beyazid Health Complex.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that five hundred years ago, the building was compatible with its physical environmental data in terms of its function, planning, and building envelope, and, as being a museum today, it provides all the necessary comfort conditions for its users, and that the energy consumption is at an acceptable level.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:II. Beyazıt Külliyesi Şifahanesi · Sağlık yapıları · Tarihi binalar

Abstract

Healthcare facilities have an important place in Ottoman Architecture. Started to be built during the Anatolian Seljuk period and continued into the Ottoman in many cities, they manage to survive. However, it is not possible to use them with their original functions today. Most of them are used by serving as exhibition and museum buildings like Edirne Sultan 2nd Beyazid Health Complex. In the use of such historical buildings, the examination of their response to changing living conditions and needs is important. This study investigates how the physical environment affected the design of the complex, and the impacts of its planning and building envelope on today’s IEQ. The physical environmental data were discussed about thermal, daylight, ventilation, and acoustics performances by calculating and evaluating the existing energy consumption of the building. Methods like literature review, direct observation, on-site examination, simulation, and documenting with photographs were used. It was determined that five hundred years ago, the building was compatible with its physical environmental data in terms of its function, planning, and building envelope, and, as being a museum today, it provides all the necessary comfort conditions for its users, and that the energy consumption is at an acceptable level.

Özet

Anadolu Türk Mimarisinde Darüşşifa/Şifahane gibi isimlerle karşımıza çıkan sağlık yapıları; hem halk sağlığına hizmet eden hem de tıp eğitiminin sürdürüldüğü medreselerle birlikte tasarlanan alanlardır. Anadolu Selçuklular döneminden başlayıp Osmanlı’da da Bursa, İstanbul, Edirne, Manisa gibi birçok şehirde inşa edilmiş bu yapıların çoğu günümüze kadar gelebilmiştir. Edirne Sultan II. Beyazıt Külliyesi Şifahanesi bu yapılardan biridir. Bu çalışmada II. Beyazıt Külliyesi Şifahanesi’nin yerleşim alanı özellikleri ile plan ve yapı kabuğu özellikleri birlikte ele alınarak fiziksel çevre verilerinin Şifahane tasarımına etkisi ve kullanıcılarına sağladığı iç ortam kalitesi analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada fiziksel çevre verileri; ısıl performans, doğal aydınlatma, havalandırma ve akustik açıdan değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca mevcut durumun yapının enerji tüketimine etkisi de hesaplanmıştır. Bunun için çalışmada literatür araştırması, doğrudan gözlem, yerinde inceleme, simülasyon, ölçme ve fotoğraflarla belgeleme gibi yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak Şifahane’nin 530 yıl öncesinde fonksiyon, planlama ve yapı kabuğu özellikleri açısından çevre koşullarıyla uyumlu olduğu, kullanıcılar açısından gerekli konfor şartını sağlarken enerji tüketiminin de kabul edilebilir olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, D., YARDIMLI, S., MIHLAYANLAR, E. (2023). The effects of physical environment in Ottoman healthcare facilities: 2nd Beyazid Complex in Edirne. GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 254–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/879190

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akande, O.K., Odeleye, D., Coday, A., & Jimenezbescos, C. (2016). Performance evaluation of operational energy use in refurbishment, reuse, and conservation of heritage buildings for optimum sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(3), 371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2016.06.002 Andretta, M., Coppola, F., & Seccia, L. (2016). Investigation on the interaction between the outdoor environment and the indoor microclimate of a historical library. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 17, 75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2015.07.002 Benchekroun, M., Chergui, S., Ruggiero, F., & Di Turi, S. (2019). Indoor microclimate conditions and the impact of transformations on hygrothermal comfort in the old Ottoman houses in Algiers. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 14(9), 1296-1319. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1606362 Bullen, P.A., & Love, P.E.D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411-421. doi: 10.1108/02630801111182439 Çakir, H.K., Aydın, D., & Arabulan, S. (2020). Adaptive reuse of open spaces in historical buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(5), 703-719. doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-04-2019-0034
  2. Cantay, G. (2014). Anadolu Selçuklu ve Osmanlı Darüşşifaları. Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları:
  3. Ankara.
  4. Chandel, S.S., Sharma, V., & Marwah, B.M. (2016). Review of energy efficient features in vernacular architecture for improving indoor thermal comfort conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 459-477. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.038 Codinhoto, R., Tzortzopoulos, P., Kagioglou, M., Aouad, G., & Cooper, R. (2009). The impacts of the built environment on health outcomes. Facilities, 27(3-4), 138-151. doi: 10.1108/02632770910933152 Colla, C., Garcia-Fuentes, M.A., Hernandez, J.L., & Meiss, A. (2016). Thermal behaviour and comfort of a building pre- and post-intervention: The case of the engineering school of Bejàr. The Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on EECHB, Brussels, 241-247.
  5. Corgnati, S.P., Fabi, V., & Filippi, M. (2009). A Methodology for microclimatic quality evaluation in museums: Application to a temporary exhibit. Building and Environment, 44(6), 1253-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.09.012 Doğanay, A. (2007).
  6. Taş İşçiliği ve Profiller, Bir Şaheser Süleymaniye Külliyesi. In S. Mülayim (Ed.), Bir Şaheser Süleymaniye Külliyesi (p. 176). Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  7. Duymaz, R., & Topaloğlu, Y. (2015).
  8. Tosyavizade Osman Rıfat, Milli Mecmuadaki Edirne A