Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

General Risk Perception and Financial Risk Tolerance of Participation and Conventional Bank Customers

Katılım Bankası ve Konvansiyonel Banka Müşterilerinin Genel Risk Algısı ve Finansal Risk Toleransı

Pages
82–95
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was seen that the effect of demographic variables on risk is similar for both kinds of bank customers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the nature of conventional and participation bank customers’ financial risk tolerances and risk perceptions in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Microdata of the study was obtained from 1718 participants of Turkey Household Financial Perception and Attitude Survey conducted in 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was seen that the effect of demographic variables on risk is similar for both kinds of bank customers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Risk · Finansal Risk Toleransı · Katılım Bankası

Abstract

This study examines the nature of conventional and participation bank customers’ financial risk tolerances and risk perceptions in Turkey. For this purpose, the effect of demographic variables on general risk perception and financial risk tolerance were analyzed by using gender, age, education level, and marital status for both types of bank customers. Microdata of the study was obtained from 1718 participants of Turkey Household Financial Perception and Attitude Survey conducted in 2019. It was determined that general risk perception and financial risk tolerance of customers who have term deposit accounts at conventional banks or participation accounts at participation banks differs according to all demographic variables except gender. In addition, it was seen that the effect of demographic variables on risk is similar for both kinds of bank customers.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’deki konvansiyonel banka müşterileri ile katılım bankası müşterilerinin finansal risk toleranslarının ve genel risk algılarının yapısını incelemektir. Bu amaçla her iki tür banka müşterilerinin cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim düzeyi ve medeni durum bilgileri kullanılarak demografik değişkenlerin risk algısı ve finansal risk toleransı üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın verileri 2019 yılında gerçekleştirilen Türkiye Hanehalkı Finansal Algı ve Tutum Araştırmasına katılan 1718 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Vadeli mevduat hesabı ya da kâr payı hesabı olan müşterilerin genel risk algısının ve finansal risk toleransının cinsiyet hariç incelenen tüm demografik değişkenlere göre farklılaştığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca demografik değişkenlerin risk üzerindeki var olan etkisinin her iki banka müşterileri için benzer şekilde gerçekleştiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜLEV, S., BURGAZOĞLU, H., SELÇUK, M. (2022). General Risk Perception and Financial Risk Tolerance of Participation and Conventional Bank Customers. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 82–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/877398

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akgüneş, A. O. (2021). Finansal Risk Toleransı ve Demografik Değişkenler Arasındaki İlişki: Finansal Okuryazarlığın Moderatör Etkisi. Maliye Finans Yazıları, (115), 9–26. doi:10.33203/mfy.840442 Al-Ajmi, J. (2008). Risk tolerance of individual investors in an emerging market. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 17(1). Aysan, A. F., Disli, M., Duygun, M. ve Ozturk, H. (2018). Religiosity versus rationality: Depositor behavior in Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(1), 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.001 Bajtelsmit, V. L. ve Bernasek, A. (1997). Why Do Women Invest Differently than Men? SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2238 Baker, H. K. ve Haslem, J. A. (1974). The impact of investor socioeconomic characteristics on risk and return preferences. Journal of Business Research, 2(4), 469–476. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(74)90032-0
  2. Barber, B. M. ve Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1). doi:10.2139/ssrn.139415 Bellante, D. ve Green, C. A. (2004). Relative risk aversion among the elderly. Review of Financial Economics, 13(3), 269–281. doi:10.1016/j.rfe.2003.09.010 Bernasek, A. ve Shwiff, S. (2001).
  3. Gender, Risk, and Retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(2), 345–356. doi:10.1080/00213624.2001.11506368 Brooks, C., Sangiorgi, I., Hillenbrand, C. ve Money, K. (2018). Why are older investors less willing to take financial risks? International Review of Financial Analysis, 56, 52–72. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.008 Brooks, C., Sangiorgi, I., Hillenbrand, C. ve Money, K. (2019). Experience wears the trousers: Exploring gender and attitude to financial risk. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 163, 483–515. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.026 Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C. ve Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 Cardak, B. A. ve Martin, V. L. (2019). Once in a Lifetime? The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on Household Willingness to Take Financial Risk. Economic Record, 95(311), 442–461. doi:10.1111/1475-4932.12506 Charness, G. ve Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007 Cheung, Y.-B. (1998). Accidents, assaults, and marital status. Social Science & Medicine, 47(9), 1325–1329. doi:10.