Journals / International Journal of Aeronautics and Astronautics / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Rights-security paradox in the context of aviation security and human rights

Havacılık güvenliği ve insan hakları bağlamında hak-güvenlik paradoksu

Pages
110–119
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it was tried to determine the level of violations of rights in the profiling processes and suggestion was presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:States had to pursuit several securitization strategies as a result of terrorism and other illegal acts in the aviation sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These strategies, which were shaped under the aviation security studies, led to the development of a number of mechanisms to ensure the safety of life and property of passengers, particularly the national security of states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it was tried to determine the level of violations of rights in the profiling processes and suggestion was presented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güvenlik · Havacılık Güvenliği · İnsan Hakları

Abstract

States had to pursuit several securitization strategies as a result of terrorism and other illegal acts in the aviation sector. These strategies, which were shaped under the aviation security studies, led to the development of a number of mechanisms to ensure the safety of life and property of passengers, particularly the national security of states. The artificial intelligence-supported systems that emerged within these mechanisms and called profiling have revealed a number of applications that will violate the privacy rights of the passengers or push them to the second plan. Profiling systems are examples of such security applications. These systems violate the privacy rights of the passengers and access their personal information without permission and make some scoring and classification by using them. As a result of these practices, human rights defenders took action and thus a discussion that could be defined as the rights-security paradox started. In the study shaped specifically for this discussion, the issues of international agreements, national security, human rights, security procedures and profiling are analysed in the context of the rights-security paradox. Thus, it was tried to determine the level of violations of rights in the profiling processes and suggestion was presented.

Özet

Devletler, havacılık sektöründe yaşanan terör ve diğer yasadışı eylemler sonucunda birtakım güvenlikleştirme stratejileri izlemek zorunda kalmışlardır. Havacılık güvenliği çalışmaları altında şekillenen bu stratejiler, başta devletlerin ulusal güvenliği olmak üzere yolcuların can ve mal güvenliğini sağlamaya yönelik birtakım mekanizmaların gelişmesine katkı sağlamıştır. Bu mekanizmalar içerisinde ortaya çıkan ve profilleme olarak adlandırılan yapay zekâ destekli sistemler, yolcuların mahremiyet haklarını ihlal edecek ya da ikinci plana itecek birtakım uygulamalar ortaya çıkarmıştır. Profilleme sistemleri bu tür güvenlik uygulamalarına örnek olarak verilebilir. Bu sistemler yolcuların mahremiyet haklarını ihlal ederek izinsiz şekilde onların kişisel bilgilerine erişmekte ve bunları kullanılarak birtakım puanlamalar ve sınıflandırmalar yapmaktadır. İnsan hakları savunucuları bu uygulamalar sonucunda harekete geçmiş ve böylece hak-güvenlik paradoksu olarak tanımlanabilecek bir tartışma başlamıştır. Bu tartışma özelinde şekillenen çalışmada, uluslararası anlaşmalar, ulusal güvenlik, insan hakları, güvenlik prosedürleri ve profilleme konuları hak-güvenlik paradoksu bağlamında analiz edilmiştir. Böylece profilleme süreçlerinde hak ihlallerinin ne düzeyde yaşandığı tespit edilmeye çalışılmış ve öneride bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, A. (2022). Rights-security paradox in the context of aviation security and human rights. International Journal of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 110–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/873479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Price, J. C. ve Forrest, J. S. Practical Aviation Security Predicting and Preventing Future Threats, Elsevier, Oxford, 2016.
  2. Salter, M. B. 2008. Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security, Security Dialogue, 39(2-3), 243-266.
  3. Enerstvedt, O. M. Aviation Security, Privacy, Data Protection and Other Human Rights: Technologies and Legal Principles, Springer, Langhus, 2017.
  4. Cordova, A. 2022. Technologies For Primary Screening İn Aviation Security, Journal of Transportation Security, 1-19.
  5. Szyliowicz, J. S. 2004. Aviation Security: Promise or Reality?, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27, 47-63
  6. Tamasi, G. ve Demichel, M. 2011. Risk Assessment Techniques For Civil Aviation Security, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(8), 892-899.
  7. ICAO, Security Culture, 2022. https://www.icao.int/Security/Security-Culture/Pages/de fault.aspx, 12 Temmuz 2022.
  8. Milbredt, O., Popa, A., Doenitz, F. C. ve Hellmann, M. 2022. Aviation Security Automation: The Current Level Of Security Automation and Its Impact, Journal of Airport Management 16(2), 184–208. ICAO. Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme Continuous Monitoring Manual, 2011,https://www.icao.int/sam/documents/2011/cma/9735_usoap_cma_manual_3rd_edition.pdf, 23Temmuz2022 Annex 17, Annex 17. Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference, 2017, https://www.iacm.gov.mz/app/uploads/2018/12/ an_17_Security _10ed_2017_rev.15_01.04.17.pdf, 24 Temmuz 2022
  9. Abeyratne, R. L. Aviation Security Legal And Regulatory Aspects, Routledge, Lodon 2018 ICAO, 2001. https://www.icao.int/Meetings/AMC/MA/Assembly%2033rd%20Session/ plugin-resolutions_a33.pdf, Erişim: 04 Ağustos 2022 ICAO, 2022. https://www.icao.int/security/usap/pages/default.aspx, 04 Ağustos 2022
  10. Kaunert, C., Callander, B. ve Léonard, S. 2021. The collective securitization of aviation in the European Union through association with terrorism, Global Affairs, 7(5), 669-686. Žabokrtský, M. 2011. EU Air Transport Policy: Implications on Airlines and Airports. Současná Evropa, 1, 161-180.
  11. Barreto, O. 2002. Safety Oversight: Federal Aviation Administration, International Civil Aviation Organization, and Central American Aviation Safety Agency, The Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 67(3), 651-583.
  12. Salter, M. B. 2004.
  13. Passports, Mobility, and Security: How smart can the border be?. International Studies Perspectives, 5(1), 71-91. SHGM, 2022, http://mevzuat.shgm.gov.tr/index.php/imm-kanun/, 05 Ağustos 2022.
  14. Elias, B. Changes in Ai