SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Developing The Fear Of Overeating (Mageirocophobia) Scaleabstract

Aşırı Yemek Yapma Korkusu (Mageirocophobia) Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi

Berre Zeynep UÇAN KAYAALP
Raşit BAKAN
Emre ÖZTÜRK
Erhan METİN
Ayla SOLMAZ AVCIKURT
Pages
60–71
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: On the other hand, as a result of the analyzes made, it was concluded that the Fear of Overeating (Mageirocophobia) Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The study was carried out in order to prove its validity and reliability by developing a scale in which the fear of overeating (mageirocophobia) can be evaluated with all its dimensions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The scale was applied to 423 people with culinary education or culinary experience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: On the other hand, as a result of the analyzes made, it was concluded that the Fear of Overeating (Mageirocophobia) Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:korku · aşırı yemek yapma korkusu · korku ölçeği

Abstract

Purpose: The study was carried out in order to prove its validity and reliability by developing a scale in which the fear of overeating (mageirocophobia) can be evaluated with all its dimensions. Method: For this purpose, the methodology of the research was decided after scanning the relevant literature and taking expert opinions. The scale was applied to 423 people with culinary education or culinary experience. Findings: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used to understand the construct validity. As a result of the analysis of the data obtained, four factors with 19 items were formed by exploratory factor analysis. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, it was determined that the goodness of fit indices determined were at an acceptable level. Discussion: On the other hand, as a result of the analyzes made, it was concluded that the Fear of Overeating (Mageirocophobia) Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool

Özet

Amaç: Çalışma, aşırı yemek yapma korkusunun (mageirocophobia) tüm boyutlarıyla değerlendirilebileceği bir ölçek geliştirerek, geçerlik ve güvenirliğini kanıtlamak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yöntem: Bu amaç doğrultusunda ilgili literatürün taranması ve uzman görüşlerinin alınmasından sonra araştırmanın metodolojisine karar verilmiştir. Ölçek, mutfak eğitimi alan ve mutfak deneyimi bulunan 423 kişiye uygulanmıştır. Yapı geçerliğin anlaşılmasında açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerine başvurulmuştur. Bulgular: Elde edilen verilerin analizi neticesinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi ile 19 maddelik dört faktör oluşturulmuştur. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda ise saptanan uyum iyiliği indekslerinin kabul edilebilir seviyede olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tartışma: Yapılan analizler neticesinde Aşırı Yemek Yapma Korkusu (Mageirocophobia) Ölçeği (AYKÖ)’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYAALP, B. Z. U., BAKAN, R., ÖZTÜRK, E., METİN, E., AVCIKURT, A. S. (2022). Developing The Fear Of Overeating (Mageirocophobia) Scaleabstract. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 60–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/872262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ateş, B. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal fobi ile başa çıkmalarında çözüm odaklı grupla psikolojik danışmanın etkisinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  2. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Baumgartner, H., ve Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
  3. Becker, E. S., Rinck, M., Türke, V., Kause, P., Goodwin, R., Neumer, S., ve Margraf, J. (2007). Epidemiology of specific phobia subtypes: findings from the dresden mental health study. European Psychiatry, 22(2), 69-74, Erişim Adresi: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry/article/abs/epidemiology-of-specific-phobia-subtypes-findings-from-the-dresden-mental-health-study/B6C1FD0DB451EDA2CD216BD4BA91A5F6
  4. Browne, M. W., ve Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi. Cortina, J., M. (1993). What ıs coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.
  6. Das, A., Holland, J., Flynn, V., ve Thapa, P. B. (2022). Deipnophobia: a case of social anxiety masquerading as eating ıssues. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 24(2), DOI: 0.4088/pcc.21cr02987 Franko, D. L., Shapiro, J., ve Gagne, A. (1997). Phagophobia: a form of psychogenic dysphagia a new entity. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 106(4), 286-290, DOI:10.1177/000348949710600404 Gupta, M. K. (2004). How to overcome fear. Pustak Mahal. Kahn, A. P., ve Fawcett, J. (2008). The encyclopedia of mental health. Infobase Publishing. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
  7. Legg, T., J. (2019). How to ıdentify and treat a food phobia. Erişim Adresi: https://www.healthline.com/health/cibophobia#complications.
  8. Marks, I. M. (2013). Fears and phobias. Academic Press. Rabadán, A., ve Bernabéu, R. (2021). A systematic review of studies using the Food Neophobia Scale: conclusions from thirty years of studies. Food Quality and Preference, 93, 1-18, DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021104241 Ridwan, R. (2015). Fobia, ragam dan penanganannya. At-Ta'lim, 6(6), 74-86.
  9. Schermelleh-engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-offit measures. Methods