SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Face Mask: A Case Report

İskeletsel Sınıf III Maloklüzyonun Yüz Maskesi ve Asimetrik Diş Çekimi ile Tedavisi: Vaka Raporu

İrem YOLCU
Büşra DEMİR ÇİÇEK
Orhan ÇİÇEK
Pages
59–65
Publication Date
2022-11-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A satisfactory facial profile was obtained with Class I canine relationship, ideal overjet and overbite relationship, with fixed orthodontic treatment including the extraction of the right upper permanent first molar and left upper first premolars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most important anomalies seen in the maxillofacial region is Class III malocclusions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A male patient with a chronological age of 11 years and 5 months was admitted to the orthodontic clinic with the complaint of prominent lower jaw and crowded upper teeth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A satisfactory facial profile was obtained with Class I canine relationship, ideal overjet and overbite relationship, with fixed orthodontic treatment including the extraction of the right upper permanent first molar and left upper first premolars.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sınıf III maloklüzyon · Ortopedik tedavi · Yüz maskesi

Abstract

One of the most important anomalies seen in the maxillofacial region is Class III malocclusions. The use of a face mask with rapid maxillary expansion in growing children is widely used in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions of retrogantic maxilla origin. In this case report; treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with a face mask is presented. A male patient with a chronological age of 11 years and 5 months was admitted to the orthodontic clinic with the complaint of prominent lower jaw and crowded upper teeth. As a result of radiographic examination, it was determined that the patient had a skeletal Class III malocclusion originating from the retrogantic maxilla and was in the prepeak period. A face mask with hyrax was used in the patient. After obtaining a positive overjet with an acceptable profile,the fixed orthodontic treatment was started. A satisfactory facial profile was obtained with Class I canine relationship, ideal overjet and overbite relationship, with fixed orthodontic treatment including the extraction of the right upper permanent first molar and left upper first premolars.

Özet

Maksillofasiyal bölgede görülen en önemli anomalilerden biri Sınıf III maloklüzyonlardır. Büyüme dönemindeki çocuklarda hızlı maksiller genişletme ile yüz maskesinin kullanımı, retrogantik üst çene kaynaklı iskeletsel Sınıf III maloklüzyonların tedavisinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu vaka raporunda; iskeletsel sınıf III maloklüzyonun yüz maskesi ile tedavisi sunulmaktadır. Kronolojik yaşı 11 yıl 5 ay olan erkek hasta, alt çenesinin önde olması ve üst dişlerindeki çapraşıklık şikayetiyle ortodonti kliniğine başvurdu. Radyografik inceleme sonucu, hastanın retrogantik üst çene kaynaklı iskeletsel Sınıf III maloklüzyona sahip olduğu ve prepeak döneminde olduğu tespit edildi. Hastada hyrax ile birlikte yüz maskesi kullanıldı. Kabul edilebilir profil ile birlikte pozitif overjet elde edildikten sonra hastanın sabit ortodontik tedavisine geçildi. Sağ üst daimi birinci büyük azı ile sol üst birinci küçük azı dişlerinin çekimini içeren sabit ortodontik tedavi ile Sınıf I kanin ilişki, ideal overjet ve overbite ilişkisi ile tatmin edici bir yüz profili elde edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

YOLCU, İ., ÇİÇEK, B. D., ÇİÇEK, O. (2022). Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Face Mask: A Case Report. Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 59–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/871975

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Arun T, Erverdi N. An alternative method to correct Class III maloclusion: Early treatment. Turk Ortod Derg. 1997;10(3):279–84.
  2. Benyahia H, Azaroual MF, Garcia C, Hamou E, Abouqal R, Zaoui F. Treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions: Orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage? How to decide. Int Orthod. 2011;9(2):196–209.
  3. Sayın M, Türkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(5):635-39.
  4. Troy BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K, Johnston W. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135(2):146-e1. Le Gall M, Philip C, Salvadori A. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion. L’Orthodontie Fr. 2011;82(3):241–52.
  5. Bui C, King T, Proffit W, Frazier-Bowers S. Phenotypic characterization of Class III patients: a necessary background for genetic analysis. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):564-69.
  6. AlEmran SE, Fatani E, Hassanain JE. Craniofacial variability in parents of children with cleft lip and cleft palate. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999;23(4):337–41.
  7. El-Gheriani AA, Maher BS, El-Gheriani AS, Sciote JJ, Abu-Shahba FA, Al-Azemi R, Marazita ML. Segregation analysis of mandibular prognathism in Libya. J Dent Res. 2003;82(7):523–7.
  8. Chang HP, Tseng YC, Chang HF. Treatment of mandibular prognathism. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105(10):781–90. Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: Relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19(3):289–311. Thilander B. Chin-cap treatment for angle Class III malocclusion. In: Report of the congress. Eur Orthod Soc. 1965;41:311-27. Petit H. Introduction to the biomechanical study of the facial mask and its accessories. L’Orthodontie Fr. 1983;54(2):353-65. McNamara Jr JA. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod. 1987;21(9):598–608. Nanda R. Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear. Am J Orthod. 1980;78(2):125–39. Fränkel R. Maxillary retrusion in Class 3 and treatment with the function corrector 3. In: Report of the congress. Eur Orthod Soc. 1970. p.249-59. Turley PK. Orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and custom protraction headgear. J Clin Orthod. 1988;22(5):314–25.
  9. Ngan P, Wei SH, Hagg U, Yiu CK, Merwin D, Stickel B. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion. Quintes