SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Academics' Anti-vaccination and Rational Drug Use Behaviors

Akademisyenlerin Aşı Karşıtı ve Akılcı İlaç Kullanım Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Mansur Seymen SEĞMENOĞLU
Hilal KUŞCU KARATEPE
Pages
322–327
Publication Date
2022-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Female academics, and professors, and who working in the field of health sciences exhibited more rational drug use behaviors (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to reveal the difference in academics' anti-vaccine and rational drug use behaviors according to their sociodemographic characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 468 academics working in different fields in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Female academics, and professors, and who working in the field of health sciences exhibited more rational drug use behaviors (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akademisyenler · aşı karşıtlığı · davranış

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to reveal the difference in academics' anti-vaccine and rational drug use behaviors according to their sociodemographic characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 468 academics working in different fields in Turkey. A Sociodemographic Information Form, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, and Rational Drug Use Scale were used to collect data online. The data were analyzed via the independent sample t-test, ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The level of vaccine hesitancy was significantly higher in male, and between the ages of 31-40, and who were working in the field of physical sciences. Female academics, and professors, and who working in the field of health sciences exhibited more rational drug use behaviors (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, akademisyenlerin COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde sosyodemografik özelliklerine göre aşı karşıtı ve akılcı ilaç kullanım davranışlarındaki farkı ortaya koymaktır. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tipteki bu araştırma, Türkiye'de farklı alanlarda çalışan 468 akademisyen ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çevrimiçi veri toplamak için Sosyodemografik Bilgi Formu, Aşı Tereddüt Ölçeği ve Akılcı İlaç Kullanım Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veriler bağımsız örneklem t testi, ANOVA ve Tukey testi ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: Erkeklerde, 31-40 yaşları arasında ve fen bilimleri alanında çalışan kişilerde aşı tereddüt düzeyi anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Kadın akademisyenler, profesörler ve sağlık bilimleri alanında görev yapanlar daha akılcı ilaç kullanım davranışı sergilediler (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SEĞMENOĞLU, M. S., KARATEPE, H. K. (2022). Evaluation of Academics' Anti-vaccination and Rational Drug Use Behaviors. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 322–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/870456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Hussain A, Ali S, Ahmed M, Hussein S. (2018). The anti-vaccination movement: a regression in modern medicine. Cureus
  2. 10(7): e2919. DOI 10.7759/cureus.2919 2.Shen S, Dubey V. (2019). Addressing vaccine hesitancy. Canadian Family Physician
  3. 65 (3):175-181. 3.Herrera-Peco I, Jiménez-Gómez B, Romero Magdalena CS, Deudero JJ, García-Puente M, Benítez De Gracia E, Ruiz Núñez C. (2021). Antivaccine Movement and COVID-19 Negationism: A Content Analysis of Spanish-Written Messages on Twitter. Vaccines
  4. 9, 656. https:// doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060656 4.Germani F, Biller-Andorno N. (2021). The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis. PLoS ONE
  5. 16(3): e0247642. 5.Kader Ç. (2019). Anti-vaccination: vaccine hesitancy and refusal. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi
  6. 4(3): 377-88. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.590304 6.Dubé È, Ward JK, Verger P, MacDonald NE. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and anti-vaccination: trends and future prospects for public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health
  7. 175–91. 7.Shi J, Ghasiya P, Sasahara K. (2021). Psycho-linguistic differences among competing vaccination communities on social mediaarXiv:2111.05237v1. 8.Akyüz SS. (2021). The role of communication practices and political affiliations in anti-vaccine attitude and transparency perception, e-Journal of New Media
  8. 5 (2): 172-185. 9.Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. (2007). YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA
  9. Motta M, Callaghan T, Sylvester S, Lunz-Trujillo, K. (2021). Identifying the prevalence, correlates, and policy consequences of anti-vaccine social identity. Politics, Groups, and Identities
  10. DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2021.1932528. 11.Sema FD, Asres ED, Wubeshet BD. (2021). Evaluation of rational use of medicine using WHO/INRUD core drug use indicators at Teda and Azezo Health Centers, Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
  11. 51–63. 12.Yang H, Chen Y. (2021). Analysis on the problems of rational drug use carrying out by hospital pharmacists in China. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine
  12. Özdamar EN, Mutlu HH. (2021). Evaluation of the rational drug use by using the World Health Organization core prescribing indicators at the obesity outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. Ege Journal of Medicine
  13. 60 (1): 13-19. 14.WHO. (2002). Promoting rational use of medicines: core components. WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines. 15.K