SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Air Pollution (PM10 and SO2) by ANOVA Method – The Case of Mardin (Turkey) Province

HAVA KİRLİLİĞİNİN (PM10 VE SO2) ANOVA YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ – MARDİN (TÜRKİYE) İLİ ÖRNEĞİ

Zinnur YILMAZ
Mustafa Bünyamin KARAGÖZOĞLU
Pages
343–356
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

ANOVA and multiple comparison (TUKEY) test were used in statistical analyses and the significance level was accepted as p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Air pollution is among the causes of respiratory and other diseases that can be fatal in living things because it is an important environmental risk factor that threatens global health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the levels of PM10 and SO2 concentration levels of Mardin between 01.01.2010-31.12.2021 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:ANOVA and multiple comparison (TUKEY) test were used in statistical analyses and the significance level was accepted as p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Hava kirliliği · Partikül madde · Kükürt dioksit

Abstract

Air pollution is among the causes of respiratory and other diseases that can be fatal in living things because it is an important environmental risk factor that threatens global health. In this study, the levels of PM10 and SO2 concentration levels of Mardin between 01.01.2010-31.12.2021 were evaluated. In this study, the necessary data were obtained from the T.C. Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change from the air quality measurement station in Mardin province between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2021. The 24-hour means of PM10 and SO2 measurements were calculated for the specified dates and compared with the World Health Organization (WHO) and Turkey national limit values. ANOVA and multiple comparison (TUKEY) test were used in statistical analyses and the significance level was accepted as p

Özet

Hava kirliliği, küresel sağlığı tehdit eden önemli bir çevresel risk faktörü olduğundan canlılarda ölümcül olabilen solunum yolu ve diğer hastalıkların nedenleri arasındadır. Bu çalışmada Mardin ilinin 01.01.2010-31.12.2021 tarihleri arasındaki PM10 ve SO2 konsantrasyon düzeylerinin seviyeleri değerlendirilmiştir. Gerekli veriler Mardin ilinde bulunan T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı’na ait hava kalitesi ölçüm istasyonundan temin edilmiştir. PM10 ve SO2 ölçümlerinin 24 saatlik ortalamaları belirtilen tarihler için hesaplanmış, Dünya Sağlık Örgütü (DSÖ) ve Türkiye ulusal sınır değerleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizlerde ANOVA ve çoklu karşılaştırma (TUKEY) testi kullanılmış ve anlamlılık düzeyi p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, Z., KARAGÖZOĞLU, M. B. (2022). Evaluation of Air Pollution (PM10 and SO2) by ANOVA Method – The Case of Mardin (Turkey) Province. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 343–356. https://ajindex.com/articles/869608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Monks, P.S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M.L., Akimoto, H. Ve diğ., Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 5268-5350, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021.
  2. Seinfeld J.H., Pandis, S.N., Atmospheric chemistry and physics of air polution, Wiley, New York, 2006. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Atmospheric%20Chemistry%20and%20Physics%3A%20From%20Air%20Pollution%20to%20Climate%20Change&publication_year=2006&author=J.H.%20Seinfeld&author=S.N.%20Pandis, Erişim tarihi: 15.02.2022. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2014 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415379.
  3. Satheesh, S.K., Ramanathan, V., Large differences in tropical aerosol forcing at the top of the atmosphere and Earth’s surface, Nature. 405, 60-63, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011039.
  4. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, A., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Please use the following reference to the whole report: IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,
  5. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, 2013. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/, Erişim: 12 Mayıs 2022.
  6. Wang, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, R., Ghan, S.J., Lin, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Levy, M., Jiang, J.H., Molina, M.J., Assessing the effects of anthropogenic aerosols on Pacific storm track using a multiscale global climate model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111, 6894-6899, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403364111.
  7. DSÖ, Ambient (outdoor) air pollution, 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health, Erişim: 13 Mayıs 2022.
  8. Filleul, L., Medina S., Cassadou, S., Urban particulate air pollution: from epidemiology to health impact in public health, Revue D’epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique. 51, 527-542, 2003.
  9. Bell, M.L., Davis, D.L., Reassessment of the lethal London fog of 1952: novel indicators of acute and chronic consequences of acute exposure to air pollution, Environmental Health Perspectives. 109, 389-394, 2001.
  10. Sümer, G.Ç., Hava Kirliği Kontrolü: Türkiye’de Hava Kirliliğini Önlemeye Yönelik Yasal Düzen