Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of laparoscopy results for the patients with chronic pelvic pain

Kronik pelvik ağrılı hastalarda laparoskopi sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
317–321
Publication Date
2022-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of the duration of pain (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The study aims to retrospectively evaluate the laparoscopy results of patients who underwent laparoscopy with chronic pelvic pain (CPPS) diagnosis in two groups of fertile and infertile patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: This retrospective study examined the electronic records of 170 patients who underwent laparoscopy due to CPPS were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of the duration of pain (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Laparoskopi · kronik pelvik ağrı · kısırlık

Abstract

Aim: The study aims to retrospectively evaluate the laparoscopy results of patients who underwent laparoscopy with chronic pelvic pain (CPPS) diagnosis in two groups of fertile and infertile patients. Material and Method: This retrospective study examined the electronic records of 170 patients who underwent laparoscopy due to CPPS were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the CPPS and unexplained infertility group (n: 87) as the case group and the CPPS fertile group (n: 83) as the control group. Women aged 25-40 years with unexplained infertility and CPPS were included in the study. Results: Results found a statistically significant association between infertility in women and laparoscopy results (p0.05). There was no statistically significant association between women’s infertility and smoking status (p>0.05). Mann-Whitney test did not find a statistically significant association between case and control regarding age and body mass index (BMI) (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of the duration of pain (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamız, kronik pelvik ağrı (KPAS) tanısı ile laparoskopi yapılan hastaların laparoskopi sonuçlarını fertil ve infertil olmak üzere iki grupta retrospektif olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, KPAS nedeniyle laparoskopi yapılan 170 hastanın elektronik kayıtları incelendi. Hastalar vaka grubu olarak KPAS ve açıklanamayan infertilite grubu (n: 87) ve kontrol grubu olarak KPAS fertil grubu (n: 83) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. 25-40 yaş arası açıklanamayan infertilite ve KPAS olan kadınlar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bulgular: Kadınlarda infertilite ile laparoskopi sonuçları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki buldu (p0,05). Kadınların infertilitesi ile sigara içme durumu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki yoktu (p>0,05). Mann-Whitney testi, yaş ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) açısından olgu ve kontrol arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulmadı (p>0,05). Ağrı süresi açısından gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MADENLİ, A. A., ÖZTÜRK, H. Ç. (2022). Evaluation of laparoscopy results for the patients with chronic pelvic pain. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 317–321. https://ajindex.com/articles/869312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdelsattar AA, Nossir WS, Elsayed YA. Value of laparoscopy in diagnosis of endometriosis in unexplained infertility cases. ZUMJ 2020. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2020.16275.1460 Gawad Hadwa IMA, Raof Farahat MA, Saeed Dawood AE, Al Ahwal LM. Laparoscopic assessment of the tubo ovarian relationship in unexplained infertility. JAMMR 2022: 34: 86-98.
  2. Argentino GLS, Bueloni-Dias FN, Leite NJ, et al. The role of laparoscopy in the propaedeutics of gynecological diagnosis1. Acta Cir Bras 2019; 34: e20190010000010. Gokmen Karasu AF, Ates S, Gurbuz T, Sahin N, Takmaz T, Aydin S. A clinico-pathological study of transvaginal endometrial thickness measurement in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients and patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2019; 25: 85-8. Raees HB. Critical analysis of laparoscopic diagnosis in gynecology: new era in healthcare. CMRO 2021: 4; 961-6.
  3. El-flahgy MMM, El-Bassioune WM, Ayad WA. Incidence of endometriosis among women prepared for laparoscopy in unexplained infertility and chronic pelvic pain. IJMA 2020: 2; 519-27.
  4. Gratton SM, Choudhry AJ, Vilos GA, et al. Diagnosis of endometriosis at laparoscopy: a validation study comparing surgeon visualization with histologic findings. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2022; 44: 135-41.
  5. Harris A, McCaughey T, Tsaltas J, et al. Endometriosis-related pelvic pain following laparoscopic surgical treatment. JEPPD 2020; 12: 151-7.
  6. Horne AW, Daniels J, Hummelshoj L, Cox E, Cooper KG. Surgical removal of superficial peritoneal endometriosis for managing women with chronic pelvic pain: time for a rethink? BJOG 2019; 126: 1414-6.
  7. Mak J, Leonardi M, Condous G. ‘Seeing is believing’: arguing for diagnostic laparoscopy as a diagnostic test for endometriosis. Reprod Fertil 2022; 3: 23-8.
  8. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149-60.
  9. Singh A, Pandey K, Arya S, Ahmad A. Role of interleukin-8 in predicting endometriosis in patients with chronic pelvic pain & infertility. Pain 2020; 39: 11. Laguerre MD, Arkerson BJ, Robinson MA, Moawad NS. Outcomes of laparoscopic management of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 42: 146-52.
  10. Dokuzeylül Güngör N, Gürbüz T, Demir MK, Yapıcıer Ö, Zer L,Sağıroğlu JŞ. Endometriosis in an Episiotomy Scar:Case Report. TJRMS 2018; 2: 30-4.
  11. Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Keckstein J, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Martin DC. Prevalence of Endometriosis and